[job]

If you don't care about the subject, why the hell did you follow the thread, and then post? I cannot believe the people on this forum that rant about a thread being a waste of time, yet take the time to post on it.

Absolute morons.

[sharktrager]

I think some of his statement is justified, as this thread assumes a familiarity level that the comments indicate many people don't have.

[tracer]

Some here fancy themselves as bad-ass Poster Police and/or are just plain angry at the world.....

[Dave S]

If you don't care about the subject, why the hell did you follow the thread, and then post? I cannot believe the people on this forum that rant about a thread being a waste of time, yet take the time to post on it.

Hey Moron, if it was about "Bill" Maher I would be interested. When I read the NO CONTENT post, I immediately reponded and I was number 6 poster. No one but the original poster had posted to the thread when I read it. If you dont like that, stick your rancid head back up where the sun dont shine and be quiet.

You idiots wouldn't get people complaining about these threads if you posted properly instead of teasing people into reading your who cares crap.

[Maceman]

I cannot believe the people on this forum that rant about a thread being a waste of time, yet take the time to post on it. Absolute morons.

Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes.

[Mo1]

Absolute morons.

Not to jump on your case .. but in all fairness not many have heard of this case and second the title was a but confusing since it only gave a last name ..

[auggy]

"If you don't care about the subject, why the hell did you follow the thread, and then post? I cannot believe the people on this forum that rant about a thread being a waste of time, yet take the time to post on it. Absolute morons."

You read my mind.....

[ihatemyalarmclock]

rant about a thread being a waste of time, yet take the time to post on it. Absolute morons.

The onus is on the person who creates the original post. How do you feel when a radio or TV newscaster updates an obscure story with none of the background?

Further, suppose the newscaster came on later and said: "some people didn't understand what I was talking about earlier. They must be morons."

You wouldn't be in the Canadian government, would you?

[TopQuark]

Absolute morons.

If anything, you actually demostrated to be one yourself.

Firstly, Dave S correctly pointed out the deficiency in the thread-opening post. He also expressed what was wrong with an uncommon precision. You have managed to miss the point entirely and perceive it to the lack of interest. That is incorrect.

Secondlt, you should refrain from incivilities such as name-calling you reverted to.

You owe Dave S an apology.