Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Chief: If Iraq Turns Up Clean, Sanction Would Be Lifted
Israel National News ^ | Nov 27, 2002 | Staff

Posted on 11/27/2002 9:25:08 AM PST by jonatron

UN Chief: If Iraq Turns Up Clean, Sanction Would Be Lifted

(IsraelNN.com) United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Anan announced that if his weapons inspectors do not uncover illegal weapons in Iraq, sanctions would be lifted.

Anan told French radio that if the weapons inspectors are permitted to operate unimpeded, and no illegal weapons are uncovered, economic sanction would be lifted.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coverup; iraq; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 11/27/2002 9:25:09 AM PST by jonatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jonatron
Secretary-General Kofi Anan announced

Why is it that it takes a Security council vote to impose the sanctions, but only a single voice to lift them?

2 posted on 11/27/2002 9:28:49 AM PST by Izzy Dunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonatron
That's not his decision to make. Arrogant jerk.
3 posted on 11/27/2002 9:29:30 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonatron
United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Anan announced that if his weapons inspectors do not uncover illegal weapons in Iraq, sanctions would be lifted.

Oh, hell no!

4 posted on 11/27/2002 9:31:39 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
In the communist, dictator protection society world, the title "Secretary General" means -- top boss "I don't need no stinking badge" -- dictator.
5 posted on 11/27/2002 9:37:47 AM PST by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jonatron
I don't think they will find anything. I heard many of these inspectors are of Arab descent. Is this true?
6 posted on 11/27/2002 9:57:59 AM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
A Kofi Anus authored scam is in the making.
7 posted on 11/27/2002 10:01:37 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jonatron
Does Abu Annan kiss up to the lips of terrorists and murderers of children and Americans?


8 posted on 11/27/2002 10:38:59 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
I do fear that the fix is in. That Blix is no more interested in finding WMD than is Dave Bonior.
9 posted on 11/27/2002 10:51:05 AM PST by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
The fix is in.
10 posted on 11/27/2002 10:56:01 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jonatron
Are these weapons inspections really being taken seriously? If the UN continues its attempts to dispell how serious of a thret SH is to the US and its' intrests the UN is essentially condoning terrorism against the US et al. Since the UN has already caved to SH's demand to disallow CIA intel or US satalite immage info into the weapons inspection process, isn't it obvious that if Mr. Bush is serious about protecting the US from Muslum terrorists he will be left no choice but to dispell the UN. We all know that talk can be cheap. I have faith that Mr. Bush is a man of his word but, if for what ever reason SH is left standing, my guess is that Mr. Bush will be political toast.
11 posted on 11/27/2002 11:50:00 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
I have faith that Mr. Bush is a man of his word but, if for what ever reason SH is left standing, my guess is that Mr. Bush will be political toast.

Concerning "Mr. Bush's word", we may be back to "depending on what the meaning of is is", shades of Bill Scumbag Clinton.

Another "tempest in a teapot", eh?

This activity has the odor(stench)of one helluva charade.

12 posted on 11/27/2002 12:28:50 PM PST by VOYAGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
They won't find anything, cause I saw an expert on T.V. today, who is involved in the U.S. in making the equiptment for detecting radiation etc. and said that it is well known & that the iraqis would have knowledge of it & that there are many ways of blocking the equiptment from finding things. He also said it's a constant battle to keep ahead of them. So I would say even our best & newest isn't going to find a thing. Saddam has it all shielded!
13 posted on 11/28/2002 12:34:11 AM PST by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blondee123
Enough of the "Daschle" anthrax to wipe out the urban population of the United States would fit in the trunk of a car (e.g. Mohammed Atta's cross-country rental car). The weapons inspections mean nothing. It's a play for time, that's all.
14 posted on 11/28/2002 12:36:14 AM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
Ol Saddam will have survived both Bush Sr. and Jr. Who would a thunk it. And Israel will be toast also. Whoever is pulling the strings behind the scene sure knows their stuff.
15 posted on 11/28/2002 1:54:19 PM PST by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jonatron
Average UN employee makes $117,000 per year plus $17,000 per child for education. Heard this today, is it true?
16 posted on 11/28/2002 1:56:32 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonatron

17 posted on 11/28/2002 2:01:24 PM PST by binger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Only if WMD are actually FOUND... should sanctions eventually be lifted.

If WMD are found, they can be removed and/or destroyed.

In the case where WMD are NOT found, then war should be assured. In this scenario, where they are NOT found, we deduce they are being hidden. War wages then to remove them.

What a topsy-turvy world we live in... sheesh! Where black is white and white is black.

18 posted on 11/28/2002 6:45:30 PM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jonatron
Now, we all know how the U.N. ignored the reports that Iraq had chem weapons in '91. We all know how the U.N. ignored the fact that Iraq sanitized the sites before the inspectors walked through. (Obviously sanitized the sites.)
We all know how certain nationals among the inspectors ignored items that were questionable due to political reasons.]

So why the he[[ are we even bothering with the U.N.?
19 posted on 11/29/2002 9:26:00 AM PST by Darksheare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Does anyone doubt that Anan will carry through with this stupid statement?? Hans Blix couldn't find his ass with both hands. Come on, President Bush...let's rev up those engines!!!
20 posted on 11/30/2002 4:22:20 AM PST by wunderkind54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson