Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BrowningBAR
Fair enough, but on this thread (maybe because of the author of the original piece) it could sound as though you're anti-free trade, or protectionist, etc.
Don't just hold the corporations responsible, although some are. Government has made it happen this way. They tax the wealthy at 40%+ and then are amazed when heir leave the country.
And with Dick Armey retiring, there'll be no more economists in congress.

FWIW, I can understand some protections.
And I also think MicroSoft should be carefully broken into at least two, maybe 3 different organizations. Boy, THAT went over great. But if you read REAL free-market thinkers you'll see that monopolies are inherently BAD for open and free markets and that is what MicroSoft most definitely has.

Balance in all things, liberty above all. -- Me.
161 posted on 11/25/2002 12:07:55 PM PST by dyed_in_the_wool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: dyed_in_the_wool
Microsoft is not a monopoly. But that for a different thread.
164 posted on 11/25/2002 12:10:11 PM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson