Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FREE TRADE IS A BAD IDEA
Bob Lonsberry ^ | 11/25/2002 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 11/25/2002 8:15:37 AM PST by SAMWolf

I hope they don't kick me out of the Republican Party for this.

But free trade is a bad idea.

For years it hasn't set right with me, and I've tried to figure out why. And now I know. It's because it violates a simple principle of life.

And that is self-reliance.

International free trade, while certainly necessary and useful to an extent, can easily be overemphasized to such a degree that it jeopardizes a country's economic self-interest and national security.

The United States is a good example.

But first, let's look at Mexico.

Under the North American Free Trade Agreement, all Mexican protections against American or Canadian agricultural imports are about to disappear. That means cheaper Canadian and American farm products are going to flood Mexico.

And Mexican farms are going to close down. The impact on Mexican agriculture is going to be immense.

Which means Mexico is going to be less capable of supplying its own needs. And it means a ton of farm workers are going to be out of work and headed north. And that's not good for anybody.

Just like it's no good that the United States has a dramatic trade deficit, that it buys far more from overseas than it sells. And that there are entire sections of the American economy which are dependent on foreign goods. For whole product lines, there simply are no American manufacturers anymore. From electronic goods to clothing to steel, we don't make things anymore.

And American corporations are closing domestic factories to shift manufacturing overseas.

All of which fits perfectly into the world of free trade.

And all of which screws us royally.

Because independence is good and interdependence is bad. Because interdependence is the same as reliance and that is the opposite of self-reliance.

And history teaches that -- without exception -- prosperity and security require national self-reliance. Americans should eat American agricultural products and use American manufactured products and channel their income back into the economy that produced it -- the American economy. When a nation becomes reliant on foreign products -- as the United States clearly is -- its comfort and peace are held hostage by the producers of those foreign products.

If a nation cannot produce what it needs -- as the United States now cannot -- it is in a precarious position that weakens and enslaves it.

We will be weakened as we exchange our prosperity -- hard currency -- for foreign products, and we will be enslaved as our national policy inevitably must be tailored to preserve our access to foreign goods. These are truths which have been understood and implemented around the world for centuries. To abandon them now is to abandon national self-interest and to doom the United States to premature but certain decline.

And it is to bring the same fate to many nations of the world.

In developing countries, lingering poverty and delayed development are tied directly to a failure to be nationally self-reliant. When nations feed themselves, they do not starve. When they manufacture their own goods, they don't go without.

When they understand that their consumer dollars must be recycled into their own economies, they do not long linger in recession or unemployment.

Free trade serves a very few at the top of international corporations, but it does not serve the average American. Rather, it takes away his job and his nation's strength.

Certainly, the flow of goods and produce around the globe is needful and beneficial, but so is protection, and buttering your own bread first. The sense of national economic identity must not be lost, and neither should the commitment to protecting American prosperity -- even at the cost of limiting free trade.

Our first obligation is to feed, house, clothe and prosper American families. Every thing else comes second. That must be our attitude. Just as Mexico and every other nation must have the same attitude about its people and its economy.

Independence is good, interdependence is bad.

Self-reliance is the key to prosperity -- for individuals and nations.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freetrade; globalism; oneworlders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321 next last

1 posted on 11/25/2002 8:15:38 AM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AntiJen; Victoria Delsoul; MistyCA; SpookBrat; SassyMom; bluesagewoman; GatorGirl; MoJo2001; ...
Our first obligation is to feed, house, clothe and prosper American families. Every thing else comes second.

AMEN!

2 posted on 11/25/2002 8:16:34 AM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Don't forget we are heading into a "Sevice Economy". If you've not seen that term defined, it means that most Americans will serve as servants.
3 posted on 11/25/2002 8:21:00 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
And American corporations are closing domestic factories to shift manufacturing overseas.

All of which fits perfectly into the world of free trade.

And all of which screws us royally.

It would be nice if this simpleton would, at least, attempt to learn economics before spouting such nonsense. Why should we pay Americans, who demand higher wages more for a product that we can get far cheaper elsewhere? That opens our resources to actually doing work that IS worth what Americans demand for a salary. You approach communism when you say, "PAY more, so that I can make more than I deserve"

4 posted on 11/25/2002 8:25:07 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Yeah, sitting at a desk offering consultation, or coming up with software to solve a problem is FAR worse than standing on some factory line drilling holes.
5 posted on 11/25/2002 8:27:16 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Free trade serves a very few at the top of international corporations, but it does not serve the average American.

It serves my @$$ just fine when I pay $40 for my shoes instead of $200.

6 posted on 11/25/2002 8:28:47 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
uh-oh...
7 posted on 11/25/2002 8:29:17 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
sitting at a desk offering consultation

Reminds me of that joke where the consultant says "I have the solution to your problem: Do more work in less time. Take less time and do the same amount of work."

8 posted on 11/25/2002 8:31:56 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Who need advanced services and goods when you can go back to a 19th century economy that is so much better?

That said, minmizing trade deficit is a good thing, but it should be done by producing and exporting things that others want, not by turning back the clock.

9 posted on 11/25/2002 8:33:13 AM PST by anguish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: per loin
It's worth noting that every great nation in the history of the world would be considered a "service economy" even by today's standards.

The United States has had a "service economy" even when it was at the height of its agricultural or industrial strength. The major difference back then was that most of the "services" were not included in the nation's GDP because they were "off the books," so to speak. For example, nobody used a laundry service or a dry cleaner because everyone simply washed their clothes at home (by hand).

If there were some way to go back and put a dollar value on the "unpaid" work that family members did in prior generations, you'd find that this nation's status as an industrial power was very overrated.

10 posted on 11/25/2002 8:34:23 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
"PAY more, so that I can make more than I deserve"

I think you just quoted the "Union motto"

11 posted on 11/25/2002 8:35:06 AM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Throw in unfair trade as well as so-called free trade. Pay China tariffs of 40% before sponsoring them for WTO. Then have them sanction farm products after WTO. Let Mexico charge a 10% transaction tax on imports and exports and the list goes on and on.
12 posted on 11/25/2002 8:35:11 AM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anguish
oops.. sarcasm warning for the first paragraph went up in smoke.
13 posted on 11/25/2002 8:35:14 AM PST by anguish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
free trade is a bad idea.

Cultural conservatives seem to think freedom itself is a bad idea.

14 posted on 11/25/2002 8:35:50 AM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
When our mortal enemies, the communist Chines, get tired of their proxy war and attack us directly, do you think they will continue to sell us ammunition, uniforms, boots, communications equipment, and related hardware at discount prices?

Will we just deliver them pizza's until they surrender?
Will we convert our video rental stores to munitions factories?

The idea of moving our manufacturing base to the land of our enemies is beyond stupid, it's insane.
15 posted on 11/25/2002 8:36:24 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
bump

Good read.
16 posted on 11/25/2002 8:36:31 AM PST by Soaring Feather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
It would be nice if this simpleton would, at least, attempt to learn economics before spouting such nonsense. Why should we pay Americans, who demand higher wages more for a product that we can get far cheaper elsewhere?

----------------------------------

Simpleton? Like many others you want stuff cheap and don't want to pay anything, then wonder why the people her you have replaced with slave labor can'r afford you products or services.

17 posted on 11/25/2002 8:36:36 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Actually that on is "Pay more, so that I can make more than I deserve, OR ELSE!"
18 posted on 11/25/2002 8:36:56 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RLK
then wonder why the people her you have replaced with slave labor can'r afford you products or services.

Huh?

19 posted on 11/25/2002 8:38:45 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Yep. That "OR ELSE" is the killer.
20 posted on 11/25/2002 8:39:15 AM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson