Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'REILLY'S INTERVIEW WITH TOM TANCREDO (Transcript)
The Stein Report ^ | nov. 21, 2002 | Fox News Transcript

Posted on 11/24/2002 10:00:53 AM PST by madfly

Personal Story: Interview with Tom Tancredo Bill O'Reilly

11/21/2002

Fox News: The O'Reilly Factor

O'REILLY: Thanks for staying with us. I'm Bill O'Reilly.

In the "Personal Story" Segment tonight, as you may know, Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo has criticized both Republicans and Democrats for doing very little about the chaos on U.S. borders. Now we learn that top Bush adviser Karl Rove told Mr. Tancredo he is unwelcome at the White House.

The congressman joins us now from Denver.

All right. So tell us about this dustup with Rove.

REP. TOM TANCREDO (R), COLORADO: All right. Well, that happened, actually, quite some time ago.

I think it was probably last April when I did a story -- I mean, I did an interview with "The Washington Times," and my comments in that -- in the paper caused Mr. Rove to give me a call the next day. And I was just leaving my house, you know, with my cell phone, took the call. It says, "White House."

I think, "Wow. This is" -- and it's Karl Rove, and he -- he was very upset, of course, and, during the course of the conversation, he said -- well, I -- he said, first of all, that I was being disloyal to say the kind of things I said because I am, of course, concerned about this immigration issue. It's huge. I lay it at the feet of Republicans, Democrats, the Congress, and the administration. He was very mad about that.

I told him, "I am not disloyal to the president. Disagreeing with the president does not mean you're disloyal. I happen to agree with the president 90 percent of the time, probably 99 percent of the time. In this case, we disagree. And the issue is so big that I'm not going to walk away from it because it happens to be the White House that I'm having a fight with. I don't like this. I didn't want to pick the fight, I assure you."

But he then said -- at some point during the conversation, his comment was, "Well, don't ever darken the doorstep of the White House." That was -- that was his direct quote.

O'REILLY: So no Christmas party for you huh?

TANCREDO: Well, that's it. I was wondering what -- my wife was really upset about that. She likes the Christmas party.

O'REILLY: Yes. Was there a specific comment you made to "The Washington Times" that...

TANCREDO: Yes.

O'REILLY: What was that?

TANCREDO: Yes. I said that, if we have another event like 9/11 and if we have not done any more to protect our borders than we have done, "at that time -- and, by the way, still at this time -- "and if this event was perpetrated by someone who has come across those borders illegally or who is here legally but then overstays the visa and all of the rest of that stuff and we don't catch it, then I'm saying that the people who are killed in that attack -- we are -- the blood of those people is really on our hands in the Congress and in the administration because...

O'REILLY: All right. So he didn't like...

TANCREDO: ... frankly, who else are you going to blame?

O'REILLY: ... that because, as you know, Malvo -- subsequently, John Lee Malvo, another INS botch -- and, apparently, by his own admission, he killed 10 Americans and wounded three others. I guess he is the trigger man now for most of these things.

TANCREDO: Yes.

O'REILLY: Not the -- not only the Bush White House -- and, by the way, we called Karl Rove, and he has no comment on you. But he doesn't like you. But he doesn't like me either, I don't think.

TANCREDO: I get that feeling.

O'REILLY: Yes. I mean, you know...

TANCREDO: The president has -- you know, frankly, Bill...

O'REILLY: What are you going to do? You've got to be honest, and, if you believe what you believe -- and I think you're a sincere man -- I mean, it's your duty to speak out, even if they don't like it.

But here's the rub. Most Americans agree with you, Congressman -- and they agree with me -- that the U.S. military should be moved to the borders to stem the flow of illegal immigration, not to shut the borders down but to plug the holes. Now you just got back from the border today, right, or you were there yesterday?

TANCREDO: Last night. Last night.

O'REILLY: What did -- did you see any improvement at all?

TANCREDO: Nothing. Not only that, it is getting worse. The cartels that have been running drugs across that border for years are now running people across the border. They have taken over the illegal immigration part of this thing because it's become very, very lucrative.

They now -- it's only a thousand or $1,500 for a Mexican, but it is $30,000 for a Middle Eastern or an Asian. So they now run the show down there, and, believe me, they have organized it. They -- it is much more dangerous on the border. It is absolute warfare going on down there.

You cannot -- some of the ranchers on that border -- I do not know how they live there. How would you like to have your 13-, 14-year-old son, grandchildren, having -- if they go one mile from their home, from Grandma's house to Mom and Dad's house, they have to be armed. They have -- they cannot go alone. The harassment -- the threat to the land --

It's just amazing what's going on down there. This is a security risk. People are coming across that border who are OTMs -- that's the way they refer to it, Bill -- other than Mexicans. They are Middle Eastern. They are Asian. They are Chinese. They're coming in huge numbers. They...

O'REILLY: And, mostly, you were in Arizona, right? That's where you were...

TANCREDO: Yes, I was right by Douglas. Right by Douglas, Arizona.

O'REILLY: Right. Now the -- look, we believe you because we heard from everybody down there and nobody says it isn't happening. Everybody says it is. Everybody says...

TANCREDO: Yes.

O'REILLY: ... it's a disaster and it continues to get worse, even after 9/11, and we're sitting here going why won't they move the troops to the border? So you're saying now that the drug cartels have taken over the human smuggling because it's so lucrative...

TANCREDO: That's correct.

O'REILLY: ... and, therefore, they're more dangerous because they're more armed. They've bribed everybody they can in Mexico. They've got no problem over there. And they're coming over, and it -- the stakes are even higher. Now when...

TANCREDO: That's because we now have people...

O'REILLY: ... you present this evidence -- when you present the evidence and all the things that you've accumulated, the Border Patrol backs you up, everybody backs you up, and then you say to your Republican peers, "We need to move the troops to the border," you still don't get any support. What do they say to you?

TANCREDO: Well, what they say is, "Tom, that's an action that" -- you know, here's what the exact

I can give you the quote, as a matter of fact, from the head of the Homeland Defense Agency, Mr. Ridge. He said, when we asked him this, "Why will you not put troops on the border? It is our only hope to defend that border, and we can do it with technology and resources," and he said, "Congressman" -- he said, "There are political and culture reasons why we can't do that." Political and cultural reasons.

Now I want -- you know, somebody else is going to have to go and explain to people who are harmed as a result of people coming across this border that there are political and cultural reasons why we can't protect them. I'm not going to do it.

I'm going to do everything I can, no matter how obstreperous I become -- and I know this is going to get ugly. I know this that we may...

O'REILLY: It's already gotten ugly.

(CROSSTALK)

TANCREDO: ... in this.

O'REILLY: It's...

TANCREDO: It's already gotten ugly.

O'REILLY: But at least Ridge is honest.

TANCREDO: The only thing...

O'REILLY: At least Ridge is honest. He's telling you, "We want Hispanic votes."

TANCREDO: Yes. Straight on.

O'REILLY: Right. "We want Hispanic votes in the Republican Party."

TANCREDO: It's political and cultural reasons.

O'REILLY: And, culturally, we don't have a tradition in this country -- although Teddy Roosevelt did move troops to the border. He was the last...

TANCREDO: Sure.

O'REILLY: ... American president -- of course, if you read the Constitution, one of the mandates of the military is to protect and secure the borders of the United States. So there's no problem...

TANCREDO: Isn't that ironic? Isn't that ironic that Mexico uses troops on their border -- all the time on their side of the border?

O'REILLY: Yes. And they're getting paid by the cartel. Their troops. They're getting paid to bring the stuff in here, and we can't...

TANCREDO: On the northern border, yes, you're right.

O'REILLY: All right. Now, look...

TANCREDO: But they -- they will use their troops on the southern border to stop immigration from Guatemala. They will round up...

O'REILLY: Congressman, what I'm going to do is...

TANCREDO: ... Guatemalans.

O'REILLY: What I'm going to do is, on our Web site, billoreilly.com, we're going to have a link to Governor Ridge where people can give their opinion and a link to you. We're going to set that up tomorrow.

TANCREDO: Great.

O'REILLY: And we're going to have Americans who are interested get to give their opinion directly to Governor Ridge and directly to you. So then you can use that in any kind of legislation you may have proposed. And, Congressman, we appreciate it. We think you're right on on this issue, as you know, and we are going to continue on this story.

Thanks very much.

TANCREDO: Thank you.

O'REILLY: And I'm you can't go to the White House Christmas party, but I won't be going either. So maybe I'll come down there...

TANCREDO: Maybe we'll still get invited. Who knows?

O'REILLY: Yes. We'll have our own party.

Upcoming, as THE FACTOR moves along, it's all over. The bachelor has proposed on ABC TV, But some Americans think this is just atrocious. We'll be right back with that opinion in a moment.



TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chaos; karlrove; usbordersecurity; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
"And, Congressman, we appreciate it. We think you're right on on this issue, as you know, and we are going to continue on this story."

Bill O'Reilly continues to keep his promise to report on this story!
1 posted on 11/24/2002 10:00:53 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; JohnHuang2; MissAmericanPie; AnnaZ; Mercuria; georgiabelle; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
ping
2 posted on 11/24/2002 10:01:45 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tancredo Fan; Marine Inspector; Ajnin; Fish out of Water; agitator; Tancred; Spiff; backhoe; ...
ping
3 posted on 11/24/2002 10:02:34 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Wow!

If we have Bill O'Reilly in our corner (as well as Mike Savage), this is good. BOR has a lot of power.

I had no idea how bad it was on our border! It's crazy, and the fact that we're allowing it...(throws up hands...)...

They will HAVE to hear us....the only thing we can do is vote, and I doubt we have enough media backing to vote out Bush.
4 posted on 11/24/2002 10:07:51 AM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
I like both of these guys for standing up on this issue and I'm an Oreilly fan for the last two years, here's an aside........... Notice that OReilly calls these interviews. Look at the number of words spoken by him vs the guest. Bad interviewer.

Same thing I despise about Michael Savagae and some others. The caller gets one sentence out, Savage assumes he knows the caller's life history and then rants on.

Now look at Russert's interview with Rush. Big difference. Rush did most of the talking, which as the guest, was the way it should have been.

5 posted on 11/24/2002 10:08:30 AM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: breakem
While I like to watch The Factor, I do agree with you. O'Reilly and Savage both do not allow their guests much time to talk...they cut them off and interject and don't allow us to hear the "interviewee." We hear more from the interviewer. (Wrong to do, IMO).
6 posted on 11/24/2002 10:12:19 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: madfly

8 posted on 11/24/2002 10:17:05 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
The link to Tom Ridge isn't up yet. I have tried before to reach someone at "Homeland Defense" to no avail...he isn't listed nor is the actual Department, just local numbers, CIA and FBI etc. Anyone got a clue? I e-mailed Mr. O, asking him where the link was that he promised to have up, please do the same.
9 posted on 11/24/2002 10:17:48 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I suspect this thread won't get much activity...This issue not only drops the ball squarely in the "President's" lap, but shows us that he and his appointees support the anti-Constitutional position that protecting our Sovereign borders is detrimental to his personal political gain and control of the country...

As a good Republican, about all I can do is put my hands over my eyes and ears...

"Don't tell me that...I don't want to hear it...I'm not looking at those pictures, you conspiracy monger..."
10 posted on 11/24/2002 10:20:11 AM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: madfly; Marine Inspector; Ajnin
Great.

We get O'Reilly and Tancredo together on the right side of the issue, and then they wander over to the dumbest solution possible: Troops on the Borders.

A beefed up border patrol can handle the borders. Troops are not necessary. They are not going to happen. Dwelling on them is a ranting waste of time.

"Troops on the Borders" is the equivalent of the Orkin man using a neutron bomb on the termites in your house.



12 posted on 11/24/2002 10:29:43 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Bill O'Reilly continues to keep his promise to report on this story!

I like Bill O'Reilly because he doesn't just bring up issues for ratings, he acts on what he believes. He isn't afraid to make those in power look foolish when they're foolish. This issue is finally going mainstream. Maybe people noticed how hugely successful Representative Tancredo was in the last congressional election.

And, I love the Christmas party angle. The administration's reps are just sounding so childish "You can come to our party if you say things we don't like (na, na, na, na)"

13 posted on 11/24/2002 10:35:03 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Fire Ridge and hire Lt. Gen Hal Moore (USA Ret) Put a Brigade of the Cav on the border..

Camp of the Saints

14 posted on 11/24/2002 10:42:12 AM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
People are coming across that border who are OTMs -- that's the way they refer to it, Bill -- other than Mexicans. They are Middle Eastern. They are Asian. They are Chinese. They're coming in huge numbers. They...


That is even scarier than the Mexican illegals.(Terrorists, spies, and sabotuers(sp))
15 posted on 11/24/2002 10:44:37 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
The "political and cultural" issue that Karl Rove is talking about is, of course, the fear that Republicans will lose the Latino vote.

Closing the borders would in no way be intended as an insult to Latino citizens. The problem is that the Democrats and the media would play it that way, and history shows that they would be successful. It worked for the blacks, it worked for the Jews, it worked for Latinos in most areas until Jeb and G.W. Bush managed to turn it around in Texas and Florida. Without the Latino vote in this last election, the Dems would have won in Texas and Florida.

So, controlling the border is urgent, but so is keeping the Latino vote. Without the Latino vote, and with the Dems and the media making hay with the charge that Republicans are racists, the Dems would sweep back into power, and instead of Bush in the White House we would have another clinton. Needless to say, the Dems would not do anything to stem illegal immigration, because they get their winning margin at the polls that way.

In other words, rushing into this the wrong way will hand the country back to the Dems.

Somehow, what we need to do is to get out the message that controlling our borders is not racist and is not aimed at Latinos as such. But as long as the media are willing to go all out to help the Dems to lie about it, it will be very difficult. Frankly, the media and the Dems are skirting very close to treason on this issue, but unless they can somehow be dealt with, the problem isn't going to be solved anytime soon.

Of course Tancredo is absolutely right. But how do you follow his advice without handing the country to Hillary Clinton?
16 posted on 11/24/2002 10:50:20 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
If the Christmas comment is true then this White house is as petty as Clintons
17 posted on 11/24/2002 10:56:49 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
sabertooth is absolutely right. Unlike Tancredo or O'Reilly, I actually live in a border town and know that troops on the border is unrealistic. Why? Because all we need is another incident like this:

http://www.dpft.org/hernandez/dallas_report.html

It was big locally, but the story didn't go national. With so many out to get Bush, if it happened again the story will go national and it will all be Bush's fault.. Or do you think Tancredo pick up the tab on it?

18 posted on 11/24/2002 11:11:58 AM PST by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: madfly
What can we do about i?

http://www.constitutionparty.com
19 posted on 11/24/2002 11:19:41 AM PST by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I think you are just projecting what you yourself would do...
20 posted on 11/24/2002 11:20:37 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson