Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Right wing's strength in talk radio, new media frustrates Democrats ("Dangerous Tone")
The Plain Dealer ^ | 11/24/02 | Mark O'Keefe

Posted on 11/24/2002 6:50:29 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: VRWC For Truth
Klintons problems are now the 'Rats problems.

Wonderfully succinct, and true, statement.

There is a most satisfying justice in this. The lib 'Rats, with their near universal and intense hatred of Nixon (a phenomena by degree unparalleled in the modern presidency until Scumbag slithered into the Whitehouse and elicted the same from conservatives) should have known better. They watched the Pubbies suffer electorally from Nixon for the better part of a decade. This in spite of the fact that the RNC and the Pubbie constiuencies never got on their knees for Dick they way the DNC, unions, NOW, etc, did for Clinton in his disgrace.

Can you imagine what the fallout would have been for Republicans in the 70's (and beyond) if Nixon had remained a popular and prominent party figure? If he had been allowed to hand pick the RNC chairman, dictate the distribution of party campaign financing, personally dominate the Party in a major state, etc, etc? It is literally unimaginable, however, that Republicans would ever have allowed that to happen, and maybe even that Nixon himself would have (bastard that he was, he at least had a sense of shame).

Democrats, by constrast, believe that they can remain on their collective knees and tolerate all this and more from The Rapist simply because, unlike Nixon, he didn't shift his eyes or break a sweat while lying to (and scolding!) the American people and their courts. The hubris of this, and the continuing belief that they can not only avoid paying a price, but actually benefit from their open and eager embrace of Clintonism, is staggering.

61 posted on 11/24/2002 12:01:42 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
I thought it was Ross Parot. I agree with you that parody is one of the funniest to date!
62 posted on 11/24/2002 12:02:15 PM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
'Sen. Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, told conservative host Sean Hannity that talk radio gave Republicans the winning edge in the election. "I thank my father in heaven every day for people like you, Rush Limbaugh and others," Hatch told Hannity.'
Right now Hatch is skirting the edge like McCain as far as playing footsie with the Democrats. And that eery similarity to Senator Palpatine (later the Emperor in the Star Wars mythos) makes me think Orrin would be the last guy to pick up the check. Hatch is definitely the master of behind-the-scenes engineering in Congress now. Won't go so far as to compare the Mormons to the Sith, though. Our Islamericans are filling that role very well. ; )
63 posted on 11/24/2002 1:03:44 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
BOOKMARKED
64 posted on 11/24/2002 1:09:52 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Outgoing Senate Majority leader Tom Daschle blasts radio host Rush Limbaugh and "Limbaugh wannabees" for what he considers a shrill and dangerous tone.

So When Alec "bloviator " Baldwin was on national TV calling for the stoning of Henry Hyde and his family, how come Daschle wasn't talking about THAT shrill and dangerous tone? What about the "Assasins wanted" sign placed under the picture of GW Bush by the Conan O'Brian show? Does Puff have any comments about that "shrill and dangerous" tone?

65 posted on 11/24/2002 1:18:06 PM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Hurray! A speaker of the truth. I bugs me when the term 'liberal' is used because most of the time, today, it is used incorrectly and the term 'socialist' is the more correct label. Knowing how much the left has become paranoid about the label 'liberal', imagine what they would do if they had to try and seperate themselves from an indelible association with 'socialism.' Heh, heh, heh.
66 posted on 11/24/2002 2:00:38 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Agreed, but don't you think (at this time) that defunding PBS, NPR and LSC would play well in the public mind and underscore the need to attempt restoring serious budget-cutting and responsibility in government spending?
67 posted on 11/24/2002 2:04:23 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
...let's agitate for defunding of the leftist propaganda strongholds...

Seems like a plan to me. I would appreciate input and criticism.

Where you expecting some response other than, "Amen, Brother!"? I would just say leave NPR be (for the time being). It's too polarizing a target. Start with the NGO grants. Out of power 'Rats -- and their aides and advisors too -- must be made to get real jobs, like other Americans, rather than effectively remaining on The Leviathan's teat while esconced at some crypto leftist foundation.

68 posted on 11/24/2002 2:11:20 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Clovis_Skeptic
Mega, Mega Dittoes!!!!
69 posted on 11/24/2002 2:14:01 PM PST by Mainah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
I'd love to defund and defang NPR and the others, but think the public needs more educating about their subversive roles before trying that.
70 posted on 11/24/2002 2:24:44 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"In a sense, it may be that Democrats are still rooted in a kind of populist culture, and they haven't realized everyone is going over to niches," added Parks, a Pulitzer Prize-winning correspondent and former editor with The Los Angeles Times.

WRONG! Mr. Durbin is whistling thru the graveyard. What is really happening here is that before the advent of the various outlets for conservative news, the mainstream networks nearly had a complete monopoly on the mass population. With no other information, we followed like sheep that what we were told was true. How could we doubt Walter Cronkite when he told us 'that's the way it is'? Or Woodward & Bernstein of the Post giving their version of Watergate?

Now that the floodgates have been opened, people who internally had for years felt the country going down the wrong path, but had nowhere to go, left in droves. If there is any populist pockets left, it is widowed little old ladies who only watch TV and read the papers. But when you even got people like Paul Harvey spouting conservatism, does that even hold true?

Bottom line Mr. Durbin is that what you are seeing is called erosion, and it is not a good thing for you or your comrades. The word is out, and people are starting to see you for what you are. Better figure out how to fool them fast, or you are going to get chucked into the dustbin.

71 posted on 11/24/2002 2:28:13 PM PST by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Actually, I wondered what feasibility these targets might have - and why.

For instance, you feel that NPR would polarize too many at this time, and I tend to agree that it would turn up the heat, but I would guess that the average American would not be stirred to anti-GOP action - rather, the opposite might occur.

Additionally, I was/am trolling for other vulnerable leftist softspots that might need to be cut out of government fat. I list the LSC and you spoke of NGO's, but I would like to compile a major list of specifics including programs and organizations.

At this time, I'm just floating these ideas to get more information that others may have and to reiterate the idea, in the minds of conservatives, that long-term damage needs to be inflicted on the left ASAP. Cut their vocal cords, drain their lifeblood and remove their private entry into American living rooms. Force the mainstream press into evermore tenuous positions of having to carry water for socialists and thereby add evidence to the bias and incredible nature of a failing propaganda front.
72 posted on 11/24/2002 2:30:55 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hmmmm? I don't believe the "dangerous tone" label will stick any more than anything else the dems did has stuck.

To me the dems are the worst "SoreLoserman" people I have ever met.

Right in my own home - where my little 90 year old mom has just moved in - she's now watching FOX. She has always been a liberal, and never could say a descent word about Reagan - either as Gov or President. However, she was a fan of Bush (41), so she's sort of happy with Bush (43). However, SHE LOVES LAURA BUSH - can you beat that??
73 posted on 11/24/2002 2:36:56 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Maybe I'm wrong about it, but don't you think folks want to hear a clear message along the lines of:

"In good times, everyone spends money a little bit liberally and America certainly has tried to do that with the idea of a public radio system that brought unbiased news to all Americans. It was a good idea then and it has served us well.

Unfortunately, today, too many Americans are worried about their jobs and financial futures. Everyone, including government needs to reappraise their spending and cut fat where it needs to be cut. Today, NPR/PBS has grown into adulthood and with digital technology beyond the capabilities of many corporate media outlets, they are able to solicit donations and trust money from a wider range of willing donors than was ever possible at their inception.

With such marvelous abilities, the time has come to send a favorite child out of the house and into the world to make it on its own. Every American understands this concept and, indeed, practices this as we prepare our children for responsible adulthood. Today is the day that we mark the graduation of the NPR/PBS experiment of thirty years ago.

As Americans tighten their economic belts and hunker down for the war against terrorism, they also look to their government to lead the way by practicing the leadership of example. Observing this principle, we salute the good work of PBS/NPR and wish them the best in their independant role. Thank you and good night."
74 posted on 11/24/2002 2:46:56 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Liberals feel bad. Liberals have every major newspaper except two, all of Hollywood, film companies and movies, most actors, and all directors. Then liberals have live theater, all network news programs, (with the exception of FOX)all news anchors, and news magazine shows. Conservatives have talk radio. I can see why they want to take that away from us. Having 99% is never enough for the greedy liberals.
75 posted on 11/24/2002 2:47:01 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
. for later
76 posted on 11/24/2002 2:48:49 PM PST by pettifogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

"I thank my father in heaven every day for people like you, Rush Limbaugh and others," Hatch told Hannity, who also has a show on the Fox News Channel.

Do you Mr. Hatch?

Having scrolled through the 100% positive response to this story I'd like to take this moment and a blow a loud and noisey fart into this Cheer.....................

Things can also go the other way, Mr. Hatch.

People are sick of the illegal immigration that comes from our southern neighbor, Mr. Hatch. People are also getting a little tired of the trial balloons and accomidation shown by the Bush administration towards Senor Fox and his Marxist Ministers, that said recently that they will take a more militant line towards lobbying for amnesty. Are you listening Mr. Hatch?

Well we are, Mr. Hatch. Please do not forget the peasents with the pitchforks that could also show up at the castle embattlements asking for redress of their grievances.

Additionally, what do you say to the recent revelations about Saudi money funneled to the 911 terrorists, Mr. Hatch? You will be in charge of the Judiciary Committee in the Senate come January. What will you do, Mr. Hatch? Schedule Hearings, Mr. Hatch? After all, Mr. Hatch, this administration has designated many country's citizens targets of special analysis by those in charge of granting Visas.................Except for those of Saudi Arabia, Mr. Hatch.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Sorry folks, but I just had to get that out.

77 posted on 11/24/2002 2:54:12 PM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
..............some stories don't go away quietly anymore, Mr. Hatch.
78 posted on 11/24/2002 2:55:39 PM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
At the same time, they are required to praise everything a Clinton...

There's a chance I would watch if it wasn't so mind-numbing. My local news is the worst - fake smiles, cute answers to stupid questions, self-absorbed hosts - and then they bust into a story on what's best for YOUR children. It's not really news anymore. About all I can stand is a muted weather forecast...

79 posted on 11/24/2002 3:29:44 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
...loose-knit network of conservative media voices.

Didn't the perky Katie Couric get paid $65 MILLION to get the word out?

80 posted on 11/24/2002 3:37:34 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson