Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti Christ propaganda from National Council of Churches on traditional Jesus painting
http://www.interfaithbroadcasting.com/programs/ibc/ppjesus.shtml ^

Posted on 11/23/2002 6:01:57 PM PST by free biscet

http://www.ncccusa.org/gifs/ppjesus.jpg NBC-TV Documentary 'Picture Perfect Jesus' Examines Hotly Debated Portrait It is one of the most recognized images of the 20th century, painted by an artist nobody knows. Received in a vision, marketed to the masses, Warner Sallman's 1940 portrait of Jesus is both comforting and controversial. So beloved, it hangs in pulpits and homes. So despised, it was once burned on the steps of the Capitol. The image was stamped on clocks, calendars, funeral fans and Sunday school material. The United Methodist production "Picture Perfect Jesus" -- scheduled to air on NBC-TV stations beginning November 28 -- is an hour-long investigation, answering two important questions: Why was this image so universally accepted? Why is it no longer so easily embraced? "Picture Perfect Jesus" is one of a series of National Council of Churches documentary presentations on the major broadcast networks each year. Click here for more program information ... and check your local TV listings for broadcast times in your area.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: antichrist; communism; jesus; ncc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
The painting in question is the traditionally accepted image of Jesus. Why in God's name is the NCC so embarassed by it? I think that if the NCC had their way the Jesus image would be of a black Hispanic female gay handicapped pagan and fat - the PC Christ...for Christ's sake will anyone stop these jokers? I am creating a massive web page to educate all on the NCC and their communist anti Christian activities - will anyone join me. Check out my other commie church websites. Thanks!
1 posted on 11/23/2002 6:01:58 PM PST by free biscet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: free biscet
My parents had a bust of Jesus that used to sit on our speakers(those big wooden kind with big woofers that used to be knick knack holders on the tops;-). Anyway, the bust was a replica of this famous rendition. My grandmother also had the photo in her home.
2 posted on 11/23/2002 6:04:37 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free biscet
While I don't condone taking the Lord's name in vain, I do however, observe the plague of PC, visited on so many in the denominational world. I don't have a problem with the picture in question. I don't find it in bad taste. But most importantly, I realize no one knows exactly what the beautiful and majestic face of the Lord Jesus looks like.
3 posted on 11/23/2002 6:12:27 PM PST by Lilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free biscet
I don't know why the NCC is so upset about that rendition of Jesus. The guy could be one of the Wahabist highjackers, although his skin tone and hair color are a tad lighter than the average in that part of the world. Today that is, two thousand years ago, who knows exactly what the people in Judea looked like.
4 posted on 11/23/2002 6:13:52 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free biscet
The NCC is thick with commies. I had a Marxist teacher once that used to brag about one of the past poo-bahs of the NCC that used to attend international communist functions with him. The big joke was that this guy kept trying to synthesize Marx and a social gospel and his friend, my atheist professor, used to laugh at the stupidity of imagining a materialist philosophy like Marxism could ever be permanently married. The prof used to say that he was glad for any dummy that was willing to help the cause along.
5 posted on 11/23/2002 6:14:18 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
The race hustlers are also upset Jesus is not black enough for them. They're also a part of the NCC.
6 posted on 11/23/2002 6:16:55 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: free biscet
From the website: "Several church leaders interviewed for the documentary are rigorous in their critique of the image and its commercial distribution. These include, Archbishop George Stallings, Joan Chittister, Tony Campolo, David Morgan, Barry Moser, Wil Campbell, and Rev. Larry Morrison."

Look at the first three listed and you will see that this group is more about leftwing revisionism than Christianity. Stallings is a former Catholic priest who one day declared himself an independent bishop (arch-?). Chittister is a new age feminazi "nun". Campolo is spiritual adviser to the philanderer-in-chief Billy Blowjob Clinton (note, Clinton retains this title even though he is no longer president).



7 posted on 11/23/2002 6:28:18 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free biscet
As for me, no images of the LORD, graven or otherwise.


101 things that the Mozilla browser can do that Internet Explorer cannot.

8 posted on 11/23/2002 6:31:45 PM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free biscet
The best rendition of the Lord that I have ever seen was of a man with his head bowed and his hands tied. The person had just been given 40 lashes. The caption said
"BEHOLD YOUR KING"!
9 posted on 11/23/2002 6:38:52 PM PST by 2nd_shift_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free biscet
I firmly believe that a person's perception of the likeness of Jesus is a matter of personal faith.

I would imagine that the NCC would prefer some androgynous multiracial image.

If Mexicans perceive the Virgin of Guadalupe as an Indian or African Christians perceive Jesus as Black I'm sure that their perceptions are closer to the truth than what the apostates at the NCC might offer.

10 posted on 11/23/2002 6:42:26 PM PST by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
If God simply forbids the making of graven images, then there are problems elsewhere in the Bible.

First, in Exodus 25:18-21, God commands Moses to make two statues of angels (cherubim) for the top of the Ark of the Covenant. Later in Numbers 21:8-9, God commands Moses to make a bronze serpent, so that the people who were bitten by snakes could look upon it and be healed. Now it is true that centuries later King Hezekiah destroyed it; however, this action was done because the people worshipped it as a god (2 Kings 18:4). In the Gospel, Jesus compared Himself to the bronze serpent (John 3:14). Continuing in the Old Testament, the inner sanctuary of the Temple contained two large statues of angels according to 1 Kings 6:23-28. In the following verses, Solomon also had the walls of the Temple decorated with carved images of angels, palm trees and flowers (1 Kings 6:29ff). During the Babylonian Captivity, Ezekiel had a vision from God about the design of the new Temple. According to Ezekiel 41:17-25, this new Temple contained graven images of angels and palm trees. These passages in the Bible indicate that God does not forbid the making of statues. If God truly condemned the making of graven images in the "Second Commandment", then He must have changed His mind later in the Old Testament.
11 posted on 11/23/2002 6:46:02 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
According to the RSV Bible and Catholic Tradition, the First Commandment is:

(6)I am the LORD your God,...(7)You shall have no other gods before me. (8)You shall not make for yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; (9)you shall not bow down to them or serve them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, (10)but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments. [Deut. 5:6-10; RSV]

Verse 7 forbids the worship of other gods, while verses 8-9 forbid the making of graven (carved) images *** that would be worshipped as gods ***, i.e. idols. Now worshipping statues with divine honor is one way of worshipping other gods. Verse 7 is a general statement of the First Commandment, while verses 8-9 give a specific case of this Commandment. Verses 9-10 present the punishments and rewards that are associated with these Commandments.

12 posted on 11/23/2002 6:48:41 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I think what is forbidden is an image of Him. As my systematic theology professor said, "How can a God who is the ground of everything look like anything?" Interesting thought...
13 posted on 11/23/2002 6:52:06 PM PST by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: free biscet


14 posted on 11/23/2002 6:52:15 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
"As for me, no images of the LORD, graven or otherwise."

8 posted on 11/23/2002 9:31 PM EST by rdb3

Your Bible references say nothing about graven images of the Lord.

15 posted on 11/23/2002 6:57:07 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: free biscet
These are the same IDIOTS that are behind the WWJD garbage.
What Would Jesus Drive?
16 posted on 11/23/2002 7:05:20 PM PST by red-dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I think the word "graven" is meant to imply a carving which is made to be worshipped. I always took the commandment to mean simply, "Don't carve a statue and worship it."
17 posted on 11/23/2002 7:07:31 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: free biscet
I did a google image search and found this little know PHOTO of jesus:


18 posted on 11/23/2002 7:10:00 PM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I don't know why the NCC is so upset about that rendition of Jesus.

As many on this thread have alluded, the NCC is upset by the rendition because it looks like that most vile of creatures, the white Republican man.

19 posted on 11/23/2002 7:10:16 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: red-dawg
WWJD

I have no doubt Jesus would prefer something along the line of a Cadillac Escalade.

20 posted on 11/23/2002 7:12:50 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson