Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Allows Oil Drilling On Pristine Texas Beach
Independent (UK) ^ | 11-23-2002 | David Usborne

Posted on 11/22/2002 4:53:23 PM PST by blam

Bush allows oil drilling on pristine Texas beach

By David Usborne in New York
23 November 2002

Environmentalists in the United States are again waging war with Republicans in Washington. This time the row is over a decision to allow an energy company to drill two gas wells in a coastal national park in Texas that is home to the world's most endangered species of sea turtle.

The federal government is to grant approval to BNP Petroleum to sink two wells in the Padre Island National Seashore, a barrier island on the Gulf of Mexico that features the longest stretch of undeveloped beach in the US.

Permission was granted by the National Park Service, which is administered by the Department of the Interior. The Park Service insists the greatest possible care will be taken to respect the ecology of the island. But environmentalists believe it will put the island and the turtles in peril.

Lobbyists claim the decision to allow more exploration on Padre Island is further evidence of President George Bush's disregard for the environment in favour of allowing private companies to run riot over the American landscape in search of new energy sources.

"Energy development does not belong within our national seashores," Randall Rasmussen, of the National Parks Conservation Association, said yesterday. "People and marine life will be put at great risk in the rush to sink wells because of Bush administration policies designed to speed up drilling without careful consideration of its impact on the environment.

"Drilling at Padre Island is not about decreasing our nation's dependency on foreign sources of energy," he added. "This project is designed only to enrich energy executives at the expense of seashore visitors and endangered marine life."

The island is one of only two breeding grounds for the world's smallest and most endangered sea turtle, the Kemp's Ridley. There is concern that heavy lorries driving to the drilling sites will run over the turtles' nests and destroy eggs. The area is also popular for camping and fishing.

"The beach at Padre Island is starting to look more like a highway than a National Park," said Fred Richardson, communications director of the Texas chapter of the Sierra Club, a green lobby group.

"Most Americans believe that there are places that ought to be protected and kept for the public, but the Bush administration is out of touch with those values."

Under Mr Bush, oil and gas companies are being encouraged to drill on more than 50 sites on federal land across the US, including territory within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.

Geographical surveys suggest there may be as much as 80 billion cubic feet of gas under Padre Island that could take 30 years to extract and could accommodate 15 more wells.

The Sierra Club has sued the government to try to block the drilling. The group argues that by allowing large trucks to run up and down the island, the government is violating the Endangered Species Act.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allows; bush; drilling; oil; pristine; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
The article says these will be gas wells. I wonder why they used oil in the title.<>
1 posted on 11/22/2002 4:53:23 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Good catch! As in "natural gas"? Nothing could be cleaner.
2 posted on 11/22/2002 4:55:22 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Is this the same story about the island that only had two turtles?
3 posted on 11/22/2002 4:57:29 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Padres has about the cleanest beach in Texas. If Texas indeed has any clean beaches.

I recall going down there shortly after getting out of high school. I remember a couple of girls in the surf buck naked who apparently had little prior experience with some kind of drug. Quayludes (sp?) or mushrooms I thought at the time.

Anyway, they ought to check the beach for young nekkid women. If they don't find any they might as drill something. Gas wells will do.......

4 posted on 11/22/2002 5:00:27 PM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"The beach at Padre Island is starting to look more like a highway than a National Park," said Fred Richardson, communications director of the Texas chapter of the Sierra Club, a green lobby group.

Heck, it looked like a highway 20 years ago. Padre Island is way over-rated, like most things in Texas.(Uh-oh)I said "most". G.W., Texas women and Texas Freepers excepted.

5 posted on 11/22/2002 5:01:00 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I checked, it is...

Sierra Club sues Interior Department to stop Padre Island drilling

"....Ken McMullen, chief of science and resources management at the Padre Island National Seashore, said he could not comment on the lawsuit but said the park service determined drilling would have a minimal impact on the sea turtle.

"It was our finding, and that of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife, that based on the number of sea turtles we get and the methods we use to protect the species, we don't see an adverse impact," McMullen said.

'At a legal standstill'

In the last 20 years, 11 nests were the most nests found in any one year, McMullen said. Last year, there were two or three nests.

Park service volunteers drive along the beach 10 hours every day, looking for turtles, McMullen said. Also, big rig drivers must drive at a slow speed - 15mph - with a trained escort in a lead vehicle looking out for nesting turtles, McMullen said...."


6 posted on 11/22/2002 5:02:29 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
the longest stretch of undeveloped beach in the US

Those in Alaska are used to this kind of statement. It doesn't matter that Alaska has coastline, too, a lot of it, and almost all is undeveloped.

There aren't just 48 States anymore, but who would expect the average American to know that thanks to our public ed system.

7 posted on 11/22/2002 5:03:19 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Lets put this in perspective. We can't drill a few oil or gas wells on a beach, but we can have oil tankers all over the oceans that are just full of endangered species.
8 posted on 11/22/2002 5:05:38 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Good, we have plenty of beaches and really need the fuel. Now, on to ANWR!!
9 posted on 11/22/2002 5:10:58 PM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Isn't it just amazing that the Sierra Club and others never hold press conferences about the EXPLOSION of life that has been caused by the off shore oil and gas rigs. They are veritable hot beds of sea life!

I saw a marine biologist on T.V. who was saying how much life they brought to regions of the ocean where these running and decommissioned rigs are. They are some sort of super reefs. Man made, like the sunken wrecks that become reefs, and enabling life where it was not possible before. Humm.....

Everything man made is NOT bad for the environment you enviro-weenies. Go get real jobs where you produce something for a living instead of sucking off the liberal donations trough.
10 posted on 11/22/2002 5:13:09 PM PST by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
OK, so maybe you get to live another day, hedgeboy.

Today media blasts new oil drilling in Alaska, too.

The free market says it's time to drill our own freakin' oil. Who, among us would like alternatives to ME weirdos having us by the petro shorthairs?

11 posted on 11/22/2002 5:15:00 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Energy development does not belong within our national seashores," Randall Rasmussen, of the National Parks Conservation Association, said yesterday. "People and marine life will be put at great risk in the rush to sink wells because of Bush administration policies designed to speed up drilling without careful consideration of its impact on the environment.

This is an old and long-running story. The Park Service determined that there would be no adverse environmental effects. There have been lawsuits. The wackos have lost on every attempt.

The fact remains that drilling causes no permanent impact, and only limited temporary impact. Temporary impacts are certainly far less than what a hurricane would cause.

12 posted on 11/22/2002 5:15:15 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Bush allows oil drilling on pristine Texas beach

I’ve spent time in Padre Island, Corpus Christi, Matagorda, Freeport, Galveston… all the way around the gulf to Mexico Beach and Port St. Joe in Florida and I can’t remember anything “pristine.” Not that they’re terrible, but there is nothing pristine there.

Maybe I’m being overly picky, but I wonder if David Usborne has ever been to Padre Island. Maybe I should write him a note and let him know that the Bush administration is trying to foul Sparkling Downtown Pasadena. Or maybe someone should invite him to the mosquito festival in the Paradise Of Clute in July.

13 posted on 11/22/2002 5:24:09 PM PST by thatsnotnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Drill ANWR, dammit !
14 posted on 11/22/2002 5:24:56 PM PST by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Great response.

This UK writer should consider comming on down to Texas, and check out our pristine beaches.

I lived in Corpus Christi for several years in the early 90's.

We lived right there on Padre Island. Our beaches stunk, most of the stinkey stuff washed up from Mexico.

He could come to the U.S. and look for himself, but he can't, because of course, our borders are secure..

I pass gas several times a day, it does not impact much of the environment. I do not strike a match close to the source, wouldn't strike a match there either.


I may dress funny to anyone other than Texans, but I am not stupid.

Tom
15 posted on 11/22/2002 5:25:09 PM PST by tall_tex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tall_tex
You know, and not only that, when we go barefoot on our beaches and we get tar on our heels, we know it comes from natural oil seepages off-shore, not some Valdez.

'Twas ever thus.

16 posted on 11/22/2002 5:33:50 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
As in "natural gas"? Nothing could be cleaner.

And if the use of fuel cells takes off as it is appearing to do, we'll need the natural gas as fuel or a source of hydrogen.

17 posted on 11/22/2002 5:36:58 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Energy development does not belong within our national seashores," Randall Rasmussen, of the National Parks Conservation Association, said yesterday. "People and marine life will be put at great risk in the rush to sink wells because of Bush administration policies designed to speed up drilling without careful consideration of its impact on the environment.

If memory serves, we have been drilling oil wells offshore of LA and TX.

18 posted on 11/22/2002 5:39:34 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
The Kemp's Ridley makes great soup. Too bad I can't fuel my SUV on it.
19 posted on 11/22/2002 5:46:32 PM PST by orfisher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam
This just means that I'll have to refrain from smoking as I drive past the gas wells while the front transfer case is gear. I would very much appreciate if these "enviro-terrorists" would make the hardheads become extinct.
20 posted on 11/22/2002 5:51:43 PM PST by red-dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson