Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Government "Out of Control"
email to mafree-sender (a friend) didn't ID where they got it. | 11/22/02 | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 11/21/2002 6:14:45 PM PST by mafree

Back in August, columnist Paul Craig Roberts asked the question, "Is a vote for Republicans a vote for a police state?" The answer seems to be a resounding yes! The Bush administration seems determined to turn our country into the most elaborate and sophisticated police state ever devised.

Things are so bad that outgoing house majority leader Dick Armey said that under Bush the federal government is "out of control." In fact, the conservative congressman is reported to be seriously considering taking a position with the ACLU in order to help fight the federal government's usurpation of constitutionally protected liberties. Does that mean one must leave the Republican Party in order to fight for liberty? Maybe so.

According to News Max, "Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO) is being targeted for defeat - not by the Democrats, but by the GOP establishment." Why? Tancredo is the country's most outspoken critic of Bush's accommodations of illegal aliens. In other words, it's not enough to be a conservative Republican; one must be absolutely loyal to the fuehrer, George Bush, and to his brand of big government Republicanism. Tancredo's not, so he's on his way out.

Furthermore, columnist William Safire recently warned against Bush's Homeland Security Act. In a column written for the New York Times Safire said, "Every purchase you make with a credit card, every magazine subscription you buy and medical prescription you fill, every Web site you visit and e-mail you send or receive, every academic grade you receive, every bank deposit you make, every trip you book and every event you attend - all these transactions and communications will go into what the Defense Department describes as 'a virtual, centralized grand database.'"

Safire continued, "To this computerized dossier on your private life from commercial sources, add every piece of information that government has about you - passports, driver's license and bridge toll records, judicial and divorce records, complaints from nosy neighbors to the FBI, your lifetime paper trail plus the latest hidden camera surveillance - and you have the supersnoop's dream: a 'Total Information Awareness' about every U.S. citizen."

In another account, The Seattle Times recently reported, "The USA Patriot Act remains shrouded in complexity and secrecy. Bush administration officials won't say how it has been used."

The Times continued by saying, "The CIA and FBI for the first time ever are allowed to mix foreign intelligence with law enforcement on U.S. soil. Citing the act, Attorney General John Ashcroft also authorized FBI agents to spy on domestic groups without having to show evidence of a crime."

The tyrannical tendencies of old King George III of England cannot hold a candle to the Machiavellian machinations of King George XLIII of the United States. Unfortunately, there are few Paul Reveres around to sound an alarm. Unless contemporary patriots act quickly, Republicans, not Democrats, will be the ones that ultimately dismantle our constitution and trample our liberties.

© Chuck Baldwin


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
The article offers some food for thought but I can't help asking if this was written by Chuck Baldwin or Alex Baldwin?
1 posted on 11/21/2002 6:14:45 PM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mafree
Chuck Baldwin is goofy. He always has been.

I recall that he tries to pass himself off as some kind of minister. He's rather arrogant, what with his little "copyright" mark at the end of this inane column.

2 posted on 11/21/2002 6:17:25 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mafree
That accusation about Tancredo is ONLY being reported by Tancredo.........LOL. Wonder why? :-)
3 posted on 11/21/2002 6:18:48 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mafree
http://www.darpa.mil/iao/index.htm
4 posted on 11/21/2002 6:19:39 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mafree
In fact, [Armey] is reported to be seriously considering taking a position with the ACLU in order to help fight the federal government's usurpation of constitutionally protected liberties.

IOW, Armey thinks Bush is too tough.

Tancredo is the country's most outspoken critic of Bush's accommodations of illegal aliens.

IOW, Tancredo thinks Bush is too soft.

Am I missing something?

5 posted on 11/21/2002 6:22:35 PM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Am I missing something?

--------------

Yes.

6 posted on 11/21/2002 6:28:54 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mafree
Good Post J
7 posted on 11/21/2002 6:30:23 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
It was reported the other day that Karl Rove made Mr,
Tancredo personna no grata in the white house. Also, I suggest you do an overview of the restrictive laws the republicans are giving us. Mr. Bush shockingly signed the CFR bill into law with the comment he thought it violated free speech. He gave us the mis-named obscenity called the p.a.t.r.i.o.t. law. Something is not right. I see a subtle mis-use of the law and a power grab (along with land grabs)
from our Pres. Janet Reno was blatant in her abuse of power while Ashcroft & the Prez are more subtle. Blatant or subtle, abuse of power is still abuse of power.

I suggest we do an overview of seemingly un-related incidents and we just might discover a pattern of restricting freedoms of all of us.

This article may not be as far feteched as it seems.

FReegards
8 posted on 11/21/2002 6:32:03 PM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RLK
What am I missing?
9 posted on 11/21/2002 6:32:16 PM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Bush is a neo-fascist?
10 posted on 11/21/2002 6:35:12 PM PST by PresbyRev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: poet
It was reported the other day that Karl Rove made Mr, Tancredo personna no grata in the white house.

It was reported by nobody except TOM TANCREDO.

11 posted on 11/21/2002 6:35:26 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mafree
Dick Armey was right.
12 posted on 11/21/2002 6:39:50 PM PST by asneditor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"It was reported by nobody except TOM TANCREDO."

I trust Mr. Tancredo more than Rove.

Does that make it a lie? After all, he IS concerned about our open borders while the admin is considering giving lawbrealers legal status with amnesty. Just like in the carter years, if you avoid the law long enough, you get amnesty. It's all about votes, don't you know?

FReegards


13 posted on 11/21/2002 6:40:59 PM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: poet
We know he lied about his terms in D.C.; why should we believe him now?
14 posted on 11/21/2002 6:41:43 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Howlin
With respect, ALL politicians lie. None of them should be trusted regardless of their labels, but, when one of them attempts to protect our National borders, I give him/her my support.
16 posted on 11/21/2002 6:44:04 PM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Am I missing something?

-----------------------

you are lacking in personal honesty, maturity, depth, sincerity, and accuracy in analysis. Additionally to are playing a game of malicious compliance typically played by passive-aggressive personalities. There is a need for toughness-in appropriate areas, not in the wrong areas. To say there is need for toughness in reestablishing control of our borders does not mean to pull sulky little kid crap of saying, you want toughness, i'll give you toughness and then start executing people for parking meter violation while laughing about it.

What is need from this president is incisiveness of mind and differentiating between the priorities and consequences of things to be done. I want domestic protection and reestablishment of our borders, not a rogue government with agents scouring the nation inflicting another series of Wacos and Ruby Ridges.

17 posted on 11/21/2002 6:45:07 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: poet
I'm not supporting him because I believe he has lied about this, and other things, to get votes himself. He's no better or worse than the rest of them.
18 posted on 11/21/2002 6:52:37 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Ok, if he did lie about being 86d from the WH, I would agree with you, but, if he's telling the truth then Rove is a liar. How do we find out?

FReegard.

Gotta leave for a couple of hours, have an excellent evening.
19 posted on 11/21/2002 6:55:53 PM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PresbyRev
Bush is a neo-fascist?

The New Bush Doctrine:

COMPASSIONATE FASCISM!

20 posted on 11/21/2002 6:56:20 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson