[KLT]

[KLT]

PING Y'ALL....LET'S ROCK AND ROLL!

[copycat]

I hate the fact that George Will has to use his formidable intellect to go back and mundanely explain this over again to persons who do not wish to see the truth.

Dems won't admit they broke the law in FL, that clinton broke the law and disgraced his office, or that they lost Nov. 5 because the country, in the wake of 9/11, saw them for the anti-American socio-globalists that they are.

Fine with me. America is a conservative religious country, all attempts at massive immigration aside, and the longer the Democrats live in denial and rail against patriotism, the better.

[Jaxter]

[Flint]

Heard Al being interviewed on NPR this morning. In between the interviewer slobbering all over Al, Al made a very interesting statement. He said that if he does run for the 2004 nomination that he would change the way he runs things. He said that he would have meetings will smaller groups of people and not allow any cameras around. What is this about. Does he think that the media will get his word out to the public even if they can't be present when he spouts his lies? How in the world does he think he can get his lies in the public if he isn't lieing on video?

[Teacup]

Oh good Lord! The Demo-Rats are craking me up every day.

First the Gores tell Baba WaWa that the RNC buses in people from the far right to the "SORE LOSERMAN" Rally.

Then DASH-HOLE said yesterday, that because of Rush Limbaugh and the far right nuts (Us) he and his Demo-rat buddies are getting death treats.( UMMM, I think it's called being an informed American and holding their feet to the fire.)

And now this Loser is on Larry King and Imus crying, and re-writing history as if we can't remember what really happened 2 years ago.

I say let them go on. Better for us. These Demp_Rat are looking more and more like Clowns everyday.

[Ditter]

Excellent article! Fabulous pictures, thanks! (What a great thing to wake up to) *smile*

[johnny7]

The guy is a jerk. If Tipper didn't tell him to take it out of her ear they would never have had children.

In a way, he's much like King Lear, walking around in a fog, not knowing the dems want him to go away.

[ReleaseTheHounds]

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."

One of the great all time quotes... especially as it applies to Democrat lies. Will hit the mark with this one.

[jackbill]

Gore bears the burden of demonstrating why superior legitimacy would have attached to the result that Florida's court strained to achieve than to the result the U.S. court sealed.

Not only Gore, but also all of the whiney assed C-SPAN callers and other liberals who call President Bush the "selected President". This statement says it all, as far as I am concerned.

[uncbob]

When the election ended with George Bush 537 votes ahead, Gore initiated litigation that placed the U.S. Supreme Court in this dilemma:
It could either allow Florida's Supreme Court, composed entirely of Democratic appointees, to decide the presidency with a series of decisions which revised Florida election law in ways favorable to Gore, or it could restrain Florida's court, thereby seeming to act politically. The U.S. court was forced into this controversy by the Constitution, which empowers state legislatures to set election laws. Florida's Supreme Court breezily dismissed the Legislature's deadlines for counting votes and certifying results as "hypertechnical reliance upon statutory provisions."

AHEM
And in the aftermath the SCOTUS was so brow beaten by the liberal media and democrat spin meisters that they wimped and wussed out under the same situation in NJ.

George Will ought to mention that small detail

[lepton]

seven of the nine U.S. Supreme Court justices - including Stephen Breyer, a Clinton appointee, and David Souter, another member of the court's liberal faction - agreed that the Florida court's terms for ordering a statewide manual recount of undervotes violated the constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection of the laws.

And Ginsburg agreed that the SCOFLA was wrong, and the remaining Justice, avoided the issue and argued that it was rude to smack down the SCOFLA so publicly.

[Redbob]

Thanks for finding and posting a very informative article.

[jws3sticks]

Here's my fav....

AllBore at his best but without Tupper.

[HapaxLegamenon]

Whats with the guy in the diaper. Doesn't look anything like Gore.

[Amore]

Sort of off-, and sort of on- the subject, let me please vent here about the latest (how can I put this nicely?) ridiculous decision from the Fla. S. Ct. They issued an opinion last week: State v. Klayman, 27 Fla. L. Weekly S951 (Fla. 2002). It was justice Shaw's parting slap at the good citizens of Florida I guess. He stated that a decision by the fla. supreme court, confirming the original intent behind a statute, is a "clarification" of extant law that applies to all cases, pending or final, decided under same version of that statute. The only 2 justices with a lick of sense, Justice Wells and Justice Harding dissented. Basically, the majority ruled that any time they change or clarify the law, any prisoner affected by their decision gets 2 years to make a motion, and say "Me, too!, Me too!" And their convictions and/or sentences have to be "corrected" -- even if, say, were convicted and sentenced 10, 20 years earlier. The citizens of Florida ought to be up in arms, but as we've already seen by the election, they aren't. There's going to be darn little finality in criminal cases and it's going to be a disaster.