[MurryMom]

St. Paul is a small town and anybody who hangs around the St. Paul Grill knows about Norm's habits. Everyone knows that his family situation is, shall we say, very interesting, but nobody bothered to ask about it, least of all the religious people in the Republican Party.

If Norm had stayed a Democrat, would the Repukes have accused Norm of being a "little light in the loafers"?

Just asking.

[Phantom Lord]

I suspect the GOP wouldn't have said anything about him being 'light in the loafers' if he infact is. They didnt when he ran for office as a democrat.

And it was the RAT party that accused a GOP candidate of being gay for the sole purpose of defeating him at the polls. Remember their "hair dresser" ad?

[Valin]

If Norm had stayed a Democrat, would the Repukes have accused Norm of being a "little light in the loafers"?

No. For a number of reasons. The main one being he would not have gotten the nomination for mayor of St Paul and so would have disappeared from the political scene.

[Mark de New Brighton]

If Norm had stayed a Democrat, would the Repukes have accused Norm of being a "little light in the loafers"?

No. Actually the last time I heard that particular slur used in connection with a politician running for the Senate, it was said of Lindsey Graham, by Dick Harpootlian, the Chairman of the South Carolina Democratic Party. You really need to keep up with your reading, MM.

[shhrubbery!]

If Norm had stayed a Democrat, would the Repukes have accused Norm of being a "little light in the loafers"? Just asking.

Likely not. They didn't say that about Jim McGreevey when he ran for governor of New Jersey.

But thanks for asking.

[xlib]

Is that the meaning of the phrase, "interesting family situation"? That he's gay? I assumed GK was simply insinuating infidelity. Any Minnesotans know the basis (if any) for Kiellor's veiled libel?