Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/18/2002 6:21:51 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Free the USA; backhoe; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Libertarianize the GOP
fyi
2 posted on 11/18/2002 6:23:35 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: madfly
Since the subject seems already to have come up..."... rich, green, irrigated land in the Delicias district of Chihuahua."

Maybe it'd help them if we pointed out that we have a whole pot-load of potential lettuce pickers here in California, they already speak mexican and claim to work real cheap!

3 posted on 11/18/2002 6:40:53 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free the USA; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Stand Watch Listen; freefly; expose; .30Carbine; 4Freedom; ...
ping
5 posted on 11/18/2002 7:20:06 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: madfly
"South Texas is still part of the United States and deserves the same protection that any other region in the United States is afforded. Lack in obtaining this legal treaty protection will further lead to the demise of the region," White said.

I wonder if the folks in Washington are concerned about this? Probably not, with the war plans and still partying from the big win this is just one of those things they hope will go away on it's own.

9 posted on 11/18/2002 7:50:54 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: madfly
Allow me to make some corrections to the article: Texas is entitled to 1/3 of the flow of the Rio Conchos, or a minimum of 350,000 acre feet/year. The treaty covers flows of the Rio Conchos mainstem only, not the tributaries. This has been Chihuahua's defense. They are saying that the waters accumulated there are from the tribs.

Mexico wante to renegotiate both the 1906 and 1944 treaties. They also want to renegotiate the minute agreements of the 1944 treaty that Presidente Salinas signed in contemplation of getting NAFTA thru the US Congress. The US should stay away from renegotiating because both treaties heavily favor the US.

12 posted on 11/18/2002 8:04:08 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *TerrOrWar; aristeides; BlueDogDemo; Wallaby; thinden; Plummz; roughrider; archy; LSJohn; ...
ping
15 posted on 11/18/2002 8:09:40 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: madfly
Remember the Alamo!!!

Vincente Fox is no friend of America and his army of invaders and fifth columnists are flooding the west.

America is under siege in the southwest and northeast.
19 posted on 11/18/2002 8:45:00 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: madfly
"Thursday that he was not at liberty to discuss the State Department’s "plans," but did testify on halting the delivery of water to Mexico from the Colorado River."

Good idea. Sounds like a plan. Fox is too full of himself. He seems to think the US needs him more than he needs the US...when the truth is that it's the other way around. In addition to halting water delivery, the US ought to hand out severe financial penalties for American companies that relocate to Mexico.

20 posted on 11/18/2002 9:07:48 AM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson