[Tree of Liberty]

Keep in mind that thermo-nuclear technology just turned 50 years old on October 31st. I think it's a plausible assumption that we've got something even more strategically effective now.

Also remember that the Administration stated it was looking into intercontinental "kinetic weapons", an ICBM that would carry a large mass as the warhead that is not explosive, but that has the ability to be recalled.

[Mr. Mojo]

I think it's a plausible assumption that we've got something even more strategically effective now.

I agree...it's quite plausible. I'll admit that the MX holds a bit of sentimental value to me (strange as that may sound). I connect its deployment with my favorite President (Ronald Reagan), and with the time in my life I was just starting to get into politics. Reagan's push for the MX also played no small part in bankrupting the Soviet Union and ending the Cold War.

[Lockbox]

Keep in mind that thermo-nuclear technology just turned 50 years old on October 31st. I think it's a plausible assumption that we've got something even more strategically effective now.

Yes we do. This is TOP SECRET, but I can give you a little insight.

Our most feared weapon is a Gulfstream V, with Bill and Hillary. We send them to another country and they destroy it from inside out.

We also have a ‘low’ yield version with just Jimmy Carter. We just send him and he sucks up the country’s resources by building homes for their poor. After a few hundred homes for the poor most countries will be broke.