Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP to Pro-lifers: 'Thanks for Your Votes, Now Get Lost!'
NewsMax ^ | 11/15/02 | Limbacher

Posted on 11/15/2002 1:38:38 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Republican leaders are jabbing a thumb in the eyes of pro-lifers whose votes were largely responsible for the GOP victory in the November 5, elections, an angry Ken Connor charges.

Connor, president of the Family Research Council, ripped into the Republican congressional leadership for not standing firmly against the bankruptcy bill which contains Sen. Chuck Schumer's hostile pro-abortion amendment.

"The GOP is saying to pro-lifers, 'Thanks for your votes, now get lost!'" Connor said.

"Instead of rewarding pro-life Americans for giving their votes overwhelmingly to Republican candidates in last week's election, the GOP leadership is jabbing a thumb in their eye barely a week after the election at the behest of the well-heeled business wing of the party.

"Pro-lifers are asking themselves why they bothered when the GOP appears intent on sticking them with a gratuitous anti-life law that would expose peaceful anti-abortion protestors to financial ruin," Connor continued.

"Meanwhile, as GOP leaders ram through the Schumer amendment, pro-lifers are being told there is not enough time in the lame duck session to get a Senate vote on the bill banning partial-birth abortion the House passed last July.

According to Connor, The Schumer amendment "effectively says, 'If you are a pro-life protester and you wind up with a money judgment against you for engaging in what we regard as constitutionally protected speech and activity, you are not going to be able to discharge that debt in bankruptcy,'

"The effect of that is to create a disfavored class for purposes of punishing politically incorrect speech, because the only group that is being singled out for this kind of treatment is pro-life protestors.

"It's imperative that the GOP leadership put the same muscle behind the partial-birth abortion ban as they appear to be giving to the bankruptcy bill."

Once again, the GOP leadership is proving that they simply don't know who their real friends are.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gop; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2002 1:38:38 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Except, except...what happened was that the House
Republicans plain flat refused to vote to bring it up until the Schumer language was stripped out of it. Once the language was taken out, they voted to bring the measure to the floor. So what is this guy talking about?
2 posted on 11/15/2002 1:41:29 PM PST by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The ban on "partial" birth abortion will happen in the next Congress. The last thing we want to do is pull a Newt Gingrich and announce that "all the Democrat bases are belong to us."
3 posted on 11/15/2002 1:41:39 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
""Pro-lifers are asking themselves why they bothered when the GOP appears intent on sticking them with a gratuitous anti-life law that would expose peaceful anti-abortion protestors to financial ruin," Connor continued. "

Perhaps the Pro-Life group needs to form their own political party to promote their agenda.

4 posted on 11/15/2002 1:44:12 PM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
The bill was defeated BECAUSE IT CONTAINED THE ABORTION PROVISION -- read this morning's Wall Street Journal; what is this man screaming about?
5 posted on 11/15/2002 1:46:00 PM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
This guy is a lunatic. You can see this in this statement
"Pro-lifers are asking themselves why they bothered when the GOP appears intent on sticking them with a gratuitous anti-life law that would expose peaceful anti-abortion protestors to financial ruin," Connor continued.

Law-abiding protestors can't be sued into financial ruin.

The provision was stupid. It was inserted as a poison pill to kill the bill. The bill was killed. Then it was fixed.

This guy just wants to scream and make a scene. Protesting is probably his whole life.

6 posted on 11/15/2002 1:46:51 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Limbacher's an idiot. Most everything he writes has errors or idiotic claims in it.

It's sensationalistic tabloid trash.
7 posted on 11/15/2002 1:46:58 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
I don't know either! I stopped reading when I got to this at the beginning.

Republican leaders are jabbing a thumb in the eyes of pro-lifers whose votes were largely responsible for the GOP victory in the November 5, elections, an angry Ken .................

A false assumption to begin with IMHO.

8 posted on 11/15/2002 1:46:59 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Can anyone explain to me what kind of 'judgement' would be levied against a pro-life abortion clinic protester who doesn't break any laws or damage any property in the course of the protest? Have their been any civil judgements like this and on what grounds?

Sounds to me like an amendment without a real purpose other than to make the whole bill toxic.

9 posted on 11/15/2002 1:47:23 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The ban on "partial" birth abortion will happen in the next Congress.

What are you smoking?

10 posted on 11/15/2002 1:49:19 PM PST by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I got an email about this that said the pro lifers had been successful. I'm confused.
11 posted on 11/15/2002 1:49:27 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
Perhaps the Pro-Life group needs to form their own political party to promote their agenda.

Perhaps you should be made aware of the number of pro life Republicans.

12 posted on 11/15/2002 1:50:32 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: laconic
"The bill was defeated BECAUSE IT CONTAINED THE ABORTION PROVISION "

Yes but I believe the provision that it contained was that people who end up getting fines for their participation in pro life demonstrations cannot file them off in bankruptcy.

13 posted on 11/15/2002 1:50:38 PM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
Perhaps the Pro-Life group needs to form their own political party to promote their agenda.

They have, it's called the Republicans.

14 posted on 11/15/2002 1:50:58 PM PST by SwordofTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The ban on "partial" birth abortion will happen in the next Congress. The last thing we want to do is pull a Newt Gingrich and announce that "all the Democrat bases are belong to us."

One thing that strikes me as odd in this Partial Birth Abortion debate is this. If you honestly believe that PBA is the taking of an innocent life why would you want to wait? Does politics trump the innocent lives that will be lost while we wait? - Tom

15 posted on 11/15/2002 1:51:14 PM PST by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I got an email about this that said the pro lifers had been successful. I'm confused.

COnservative pro lifers joined with liberals to defeat the bill.

16 posted on 11/15/2002 1:51:21 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom
They won't wait on PBA. Lott has already said it will be brought to the senate floor when he becomes majority leader. The House has already passed the ban.

Daschle could give a flying .... how many die in the interim.

17 posted on 11/15/2002 1:53:02 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
My understanding is that this is bill has 'died' and is not expected to 'resurrect' unless the verbiage singling out pro-life activists is removed. So what did I miss, or is it this guy that's missing something?
18 posted on 11/15/2002 1:53:45 PM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth
"They have, it's called the Republicans. "

But I thought the thrust of this story was that the Republicans don't seem to be treating them real well.

19 posted on 11/15/2002 1:54:00 PM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
The reason conservatives joined liberals to defeat the bill was because the dims put the rider in there making pro lifers a separate and unequal group of Americans. I, for on, am glad it was defeated.

Pro Life conservative republican here.

20 posted on 11/15/2002 1:55:01 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson