[thinden]

"I write to bring these false statements to the attention of the Department of Justice for investigation and, if warranted, prosecution," Burton wrote.

too bad for reser he wasnt' a member of the Xlinton regime.

none of them were ever prosecuted for making false statements to congress, lying to grand juries, making false testimony under oath......

of course the catch 22 to this "prosecution" will be that reser should be able to subpeana the tapes for his own defense.

[mad_as_he$$]

Ok so here we go again. ALL of you people who hang so much credibility on eye witnesses please note this case. In addition don't forget the "eyewitness" in the DC sniper case. I am (once again) sorry that you people insist that eyewitnesses are "the best" evidence. Please take this lesson to heart.

[Cicero]

a) How can they prosecute him without releasing all the surveillance tapes to the defense? Does this mean they have finished shredding and editing the tapes?

b) This comes hard on the heels of a reposting of Reser's statement about the second man in the van here on FreeRepublic. Is there a connection? Are they going after him because the story has been revived?

[lelio]

"no records of any video or still photographic surveillance cameras in or around the Murrah Federal Building
Absolutely no video cameras around a federal building? Huh? Every single underground parking garage I've been to has cameras. Maybe he meant to say "no video tapes were found" especially after they brought in the demolition equipment.

[backhoe]

Locator ^

[F.J. Mitchell]

So. Is Reser yet another sacrificial lamb, in this case? If Clinton was still President on 9/11, would we be looking for white, Americian, ex Gulf War soldiers as the primary suspects ? Who knows?

Has Reser passed a lie detector test?, truth serum, hypnosis? Or has his sworn testimony been ruled a lie, because someone elses words that refute his testimony are believed over his? THe tape could well have existed and been made to disappear. THe public really needs to know!