Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Plan to Allow Confirmation of 2 Judges
The New York Times ^ | 11/12/2002 (for editions of 11/13/2002) | Neil A. Lewis

Posted on 11/12/2002 7:00:17 PM PST by GeneD

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 11/12/2002 7:00:18 PM PST by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
NY Times- what slime.
2 posted on 11/12/2002 7:02:18 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Just like the Hoobastank song

"Too Little Too Late"
3 posted on 11/12/2002 7:03:18 PM PST by Ralph the Hun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Judge Shedd was a former aide to Senator Strom Thurmond, the South Carolina Republican who complained on the Senate floor last month that the delay on that nomination was unconscionable.

And now for the truth: Senator Thurmond protested on the Senate floor that Senator Leahy had promised Thurmond personally (as well as others) that Shedd would get a hearing, and said that Senator Leahy broke his word, and that was unconscionable.

4 posted on 11/12/2002 7:03:21 PM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
The time to offer your opponent a slice of the pie is before he ends up owning the whole thing.
5 posted on 11/12/2002 7:05:15 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Maybe whoever's going to be in charge of assigning Senate offices after 1/1/2003 can find a nice broom closet to stick Senator Leahy in.
6 posted on 11/12/2002 7:06:36 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
It may be difficult for the White House, for example, to count on the support of some moderate Republicans for candidates believed to be strong opponents of abortion rights.

Then again, it may not be :-)

7 posted on 11/12/2002 7:06:51 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
YES, it was Unconciosunable of Leahy....but, highly expected - he's a Democrat isn't he? The Democrat formerly known as "Leaky Leahy" who got thrown off of a Senate committee for LEAKING SECRETS.
8 posted on 11/12/2002 7:07:15 PM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
"Once the election returns were in, this became the obvious way to go," one Democratic aide said.

Payback is a bitch.

9 posted on 11/12/2002 7:07:19 PM PST by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
One Democratic aide said the Thursday vote on the two nominees was a gesture of good will. Senator Patrick J. Leahy, the Vermont Democrat who will relinquish the chairman's seat in several weeks to Mr. Hatch, scheduled the session and Democratic aides said they expected the two candidates to be approved.

I doubt anyone ever accused Leahy of good will regarding anything.

10 posted on 11/12/2002 7:08:22 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ralph the Hun
If the pubs did'nt win this past election, do you think they would have seen the light of day? LOL, The Rats are trying to save a little face just like the compromise for homeland security.


11 posted on 11/12/2002 7:08:49 PM PST by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Republicans said today that they recognized the agreement to vote less as a gesture of good will than as an appeal to Senator Hatch to be kind as he allocates committee and staff resources.

After the way that slimeball Leaky treated Strom and Hatch, you better believe the Dems have a lot to answer for.

I don't think I have ever seen Hatch as pissed as he was the day they screwed Strom.

I hope paybacks are a bitch, especially for the bastard Leaky.

He deserves to be horse whipped

12 posted on 11/12/2002 7:08:53 PM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Bend over, Leahy--here comes your karma.
13 posted on 11/12/2002 7:10:09 PM PST by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Gee fellas... Hey, yer not mad are ya....

Here, let's be friends now... See, we'll give ya a couple of nice judges...

Now, you won't be mean and exclusive next month, will ya guys????

BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!!!
14 posted on 11/12/2002 7:11:57 PM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Democrats surprised themselves over the last year in holding together and defeating Judge Pickering and Justice Owens while delaying other nominations.

Well, that is one of the biggest lies I've seen in the past few days.

It was no surprise. It was raw political power, exercised intentionally.

15 posted on 11/12/2002 7:16:26 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
A spokesman for Senator Trent Lott, the Mississippi Republican who will become majority leader next year, said the administration would also renominate Charles W. Pickering Sr., the other Bush candidate defeated outright during the Democrats' period of control.

This is beautiful to see. I had hoped that the Republicans would bring again Mr. Pickering's nomination, and this time let the entire Senate vote on his appointment.

Playing the game of politics is one thing, but ruining a man's name and career, simply for the sake of politics is childish at best and criminal character assassination at worst. Man, I'm glad the Democrats are out of power.

16 posted on 11/12/2002 7:18:19 PM PST by good1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Advise to Hatch... SPIT IN THEIR EYE!
17 posted on 11/12/2002 7:18:34 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Let's just say it's time for the DemonicRats to be BIpartisan!

Pray for GW andt the Truth

18 posted on 11/12/2002 7:19:11 PM PST by bray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Since a new Congress session will begin in January, do the present nominees, who have been waiting, have to be resubmitted and the process start all over again?

All help appreciated.
19 posted on 11/12/2002 7:19:58 PM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray
Still a shrewd move by the RATS this week... very smart indeed. And we get two of our judges even sooner than expected, and it is bound to anger their base even further.
20 posted on 11/12/2002 7:23:12 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson