Skip to comments.
IBM unveils faster transistor : switch can run three times as fast as current echnology.
CNN Money ^
| November 4, 2002
| Reuters
Posted on 11/12/2002 11:12:52 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:01:37 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Computer company says new electronic switch can run three times as fast as current technology.
EAST FISHKILL, N.Y. (Reuters) - International Business Machines Corp. said Monday that it had built a transistor, or an electronic switch, that can run at speeds of 350 billion cycles per second -- three times as fast as current technology.
(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Technical
KEYWORDS: computing; ibm; techindex; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: *tech_index; Mathlete; Apple Pan Dowdy; grundle; beckett; billorites; One More Time; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dog Gone; Carry_Okie; snopercod; dalereed
Great catch Ernesto!!!
That's just what this nation needs RIGHT NOW!
Some inspiration to go along with the perspiration!!!
To: SierraWasp
That's just what this nation needs RIGHT NOW! What our country needs right now is a business friendly environment that will allow the creation of markets that can use this technology.
4
posted on
11/12/2002 12:10:25 PM PST
by
Moonman62
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"350 billion cycles per second"Lord, have mercy!
5
posted on
11/12/2002 12:13:26 PM PST
by
rudypoot
To: rudypoot
Its going into communication equipment!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
IBM unveils faster transistor : switch can run three times as fast as current echnology.Will it work with spell check?
7
posted on
11/12/2002 12:19:40 PM PST
by
dead
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Vroom! Vroom! Vroom! Go High ech!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Phones?! Pheuy!
I want a 150GHz computer processor! :-)
9
posted on
11/12/2002 1:04:01 PM PST
by
Jake0001
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
All Your NICs Are Belong To Us!
To: Jake0001
I cant site a source (due to non-disclosure agreements) but if this is combined with "multi-clock" technology, within 5 years the "hot" PC will be running at an equilivant speed a TeraHz or so.
[sigh]
I guess I'll be getting by on my 850Mhz for a while yet. :-)
To: taxcontrol
That's where different regions of a microprocessor are served by separate clocks, so as to limit the problems of clock signal propogation, right?
12
posted on
11/12/2002 1:56:49 PM PST
by
mvpel
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It seems like a minority carrier lifetime ago when I knew all this stuff.
To: mvpel
Sorry, no comment. The lawyers are looking over my shoulder.
To: snopercod; SierraWasp
Interesting problem for packaging engineers.
The problem with clock speeds like that isn't the processing, it's getting the information on and off the chip. There will need to be some very fancy multilayered Tape Automated Bonding with either stripline or coplanar waveguide configuration to minimize the inductive loss and lack of repeatability inherent to wire bonding. Unfortunately, such matched impedance launch technology takes room.
To: Carry_Okie
There will need to be some very fancy multilayered Tape Automated Bonding with either stripline or coplanar waveguide configuration to minimize the inductive loss and lack of repeatability inherent to wire bonding. Unfortunately, such matched impedance launch technology takes room.Exactly what I was thinking <8-)
To: snopercod
LOL! I spent two years in the microwave hybrid business.
To: Carry_Okie
Can you imagine tuning 350GHz waveguide?
18
posted on
11/12/2002 6:31:00 PM PST
by
BobS
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"switch can run three times as fast as current echnology. "
Does this mean it will become obsolete 3x as quick?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Wasn't there an item on CNN last week about two scientists being able to physically 'touch' each other across the Internet ? They said they had super high speed connections.
Think of it. Cybersex in five years. Talk about a killer app. Get ready for the next tech boom. Lucent is a strong buy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson