Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election losses for Dems might help (Sen. John) Edwards' future chances
Durham Herald-Sun (Durham, NC) ^ | November 12, 2002 | The Associated Press

Posted on 11/12/2002 5:22:11 AM PST by Constitution Day



Election losses for Dems might help Edwards' future chances

The Associated Press
November 12, 2002   1:49 am

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- U.S. Sen. John Edwards may suffer less damage from last week's Republican victories than other prominent Democrats considering runs for the White House in 2004, analysts say.

Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt -- top party officials who are considered presidential contenders -- face growing criticism within their party for surrendering the Senate and allowing Republicans to widen their control in the House.

Tied to a similar stake is former Vice President Al Gore, who campaigned for many of the Democrats who lost last week and also remains a considerable force within the party.

"There is definitely going to be a yearning at the grass-roots level for a new message and a new messenger," said Christopher Cooper, a Democratic strategist and native of South Carolina.

As the "fresh face" candidate, Edwards also could get a bounce from Democrats seeking anyone other than the more established Democrats who led their party into the political wilderness, several political observers noted.

"Could that fresh face be Edwards? Absolutely," Cooper said. "He certainly doesn't have the same baggage as the Daschles and the Gephardts coming out of this election."

It also doesn't hurt that Edwards hails from the South, which last Tuesday continued its trend of the last few decades of becoming more solidly Republican.

"This (election) really does emphasize that Democrats have to nominate a Southerner, particularly a guy as attractive across the boards as Edwards seems to be," said Burdett Loomis, a politics professor at the University of Kansas.

Edwards is already laying the groundwork to win votes in the South and rural areas west of the Mississippi River that traditionally vote for Republicans. His "rural strategy" -- which includes touring with a bluegrass band and sponsoring a race car -- is aimed at picking up votes that the Democratic Party has long neglected in favor of its more urban base.

Political tea-leaf readers don't see only positive signs for Edwards in the election results, however.

He needs to look no further than his own state for reasons to worry, said Ferrel Guillory, professor of political science at UNC Chapel Hill.

Last Tuesday, Democrat Erskine Bowles lost to Republican Elizabeth Dole by 9 percentage points even though he won 314 votes more than Edwards did in 1998.

"That's got to be really scary" for Edwards, Guillory said. "If he runs for re-election, he's going to have a hard fight."

URL for this article: http://www.heraldsun.com/state/6-287321.html


© Copyright 2002. All rights reserved. All material on heraldsun.com is copyrighted by The Durham Herald Company and may not be reproduced or redistributed in any medium except as provided in the site's Terms of Use.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: edwardswatch; investingstocks; moose; northcarolina; oldnorthstate; unhelpful
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Howlin
LOL
21 posted on 11/12/2002 5:54:51 AM PST by esoteric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
For the truth about the "moderate" Democratic senator from NC: Edwards04.com
22 posted on 11/12/2002 5:57:06 AM PST by gonewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Ugh! Thanks for the explanation. Guess he's up for reelection in 2004 then. Got any good Republicans that can abort his career???
23 posted on 11/12/2002 6:00:14 AM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
I predict 2004 will be the year of the looney left candidate.

Every so often, the Dems nominate someone from the looney left of the party (McGovern-72, Mondale-84). They are overdue.

The party's left wing thinks they lost the mid-term election because they didn't explain their positions clearly enough (translated to non-political jargon: we didn't stand up and proudly declare how liberal we were.) Any moderate presidential candidate is going to be attacked as the same type of candidate that lost in the mid-term elections.

Look for a Barbara Boxer or Nancy Pelosi type to be the Dem candidate in 2004.

24 posted on 11/12/2002 6:00:26 AM PST by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
Gracey, there are a LOT of stupid people in this state, most of them Yankees that come down here for the weather and to wreck our politics evidently!
25 posted on 11/12/2002 6:07:38 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: esoteric
Isn't that the truth, though? :-)
26 posted on 11/12/2002 6:08:13 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
*Blink*Blink*Blink*Blink*Blink*Blink*

ROFL!!!

27 posted on 11/12/2002 6:13:23 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
This "fresh face" is a $3000 empty suit with Gucci loafers.

Edwards and his vile lawyer industry is a collection of truly evil, corrupt, vile, rapacious vermin. Edwards" legal industry spits on the Constitution and ethics. They regard themselves as being above the law. Lawyers like Edwards steal and ruin lives without the slightest compunction.

These observations are shared by most Americans who regularly rate lawyers as having a level of confidence and respect at the absolute bottom of all professions and occupations. Edwards is the last person we would ever want as President: another lawyer/sociopath like Clinton.

28 posted on 11/12/2002 6:14:09 AM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
I always wondered about that and my husband reminded me that folks like Brokaw, Jennings, etc kept calling him the "handsome newcomer"....the future of the Democratic Party. That "soccer moms" would support him. I can't remember anyone in the Republican Party being called "handsome" by the media.
29 posted on 11/12/2002 6:23:06 AM PST by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Last I knew, NC law did allow a candidate to run for more than one office, but the Republicans in the state legislature were drafting legislation that would change that (specifically because of Edwards). I haven't read anything about it recently.
30 posted on 11/12/2002 6:34:23 AM PST by Nonfaction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nonfaction
I'm very worried about Edwards.

He is so popular in his homestate that he leads unknown opponents by 10 points.

43% to 33% with the remainder undecided.

With numbers like those, Bush might as well tell Karl Rove to prepare for campaign events in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. Might as well shoot for 50 if you can do it.
31 posted on 11/12/2002 6:46:58 AM PST by BushRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BushRep
A lot of people seem to feel that way. I have to admit, I don't know that much about him. Dan from Michigan has been sounding the alarm about Edwards for a long time.
32 posted on 11/12/2002 7:05:06 AM PST by Nonfaction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
FYI...
33 posted on 11/12/2002 1:32:25 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
He's not even as high as a 'trial lawyer'. He is just an old-fashioned ambulance chaser. He caught a slow one, with a fat pay-off.
34 posted on 11/12/2002 1:38:43 PM PST by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Bush will win NC by 15 points regardless of who runs. The South is Bush's. Period.
35 posted on 11/12/2002 1:41:43 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson