Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We now pause for a statement from Babs...
A hell hole ^

Posted on 11/09/2002 8:44:52 AM PST by SirFishalot

…A SAD TIME Posted on Nov. 8, 2002

It is a sad time. The Democratic Party was not able to articulate a clear message - was not able to convey the very real and very many differences between the two parties. They did not allow the American people to make a meaningful choice. They never articulated what it was we were voting for, and in doing so they failed to motivate their base to go to the polls. The Republicans, on the other hand, spoke directly to their constituency and gave them a reason to vote.

Instead of standing up to the Republicans and indicating their differences, the Democrats went along with the president on tax cuts and Iraq- and were voted out anyway. The American people want leaders - they want people who convey a strong message and stand for something. The Republicans have done this well...even though what they stand for is against the interests of most Americans. Now it is time for the Democrats to stop operating out of fear.

Because the differences are there. The Republicans are excited to, in Trent Lott's words, "roll" their agenda through the Congress. And it's an agenda all of us will have to live with - for the worse. Tax cuts for the rich, destruction of the environment, a prescription drug plan that covers only a very small percentage of seniors, an inadequate pension reform bill, an overly aggressive foreign policy - that's all on the agenda.

And there is a horde of extremist federal judicial nominees, deemed by the Democratically-controlled Senate as too conservative for confirmation, just waiting to get rushed through the nomination process. These judges are guaranteed to threaten our civil liberties, a woman's right to choose, civil rights and environmental protection. And they will be around long after the president is gone.

So as we move forward, I, for one, will continue to urge the Democrats, even as, or especially as, the minority/opposition party, to be vocal in conveying the differences to the American public. Because this is not the time to give up fighting for what is important. There is too much at stake. The Democrats must once again return to their roots as a strong and directed party fighting for the betterment of the poor, working and middle-class Americans that make up the great majority of our country.

The Democrats who stood up to the president and showed strong opposition leadership were the ones that won on Tuesday. Hopefully, by 2004, the party - and the people - will get the message.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: babs; bs; idiot; whaaaaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1 posted on 11/09/2002 8:44:52 AM PST by SirFishalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
The Democrats who stood up to the president and showed strong opposition leadership were the ones that won on Tuesday

And who would these Democrat stalwarts be, Babs?

Yeah, she gets it.

2 posted on 11/09/2002 8:49:15 AM PST by Clintons a commie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
I, for one, will continue to urge the Democrats ... to be vocal in conveying the differences to the American public.

OMG! I agree with her!!! Yes, by all means show us your true colors!!!!!

Oh. She really meant "continue to misrepresent the Republicans." Oh well..

3 posted on 11/09/2002 9:00:15 AM PST by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
The Democratic Party was not able to articulate a clear message -

I'm tired of hearing this clap-trap. The dems FORCIBLY delivered their message all over the nation: Reject Bush.

That was their message from Election Day 2000 until Election Day 2002. They had no OTHER message because they DON'T HAVE ANY SOLUTIONS. Their "ideas" are to return to the failed ideals of the New Deal and Great Society.

They think those are still viable because, heck, it gave 'em power for decades, didn't it?

On the contrary: I think it is the REPUBLICANS who now have the onus upon them to articulate a clear message. They must do this by ignoring people like Babs Streisand and our Leftist media, who don't and never will care about what is right.

They need to begin to articulate the message that a large minority of the electorate already embraces: Smaller government, lower taxes, more individual freedom, and less government INTRUSION in our lives.

You see, no one has really tried this in about 70 years or so. It's time that the conservatives were able to have a turn. We need to be given about twenty years to see if our ideas will work.

4 posted on 11/09/2002 9:02:52 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
LOL! Barbra has made the transition to comedy.

George Bush will grace Mount Rushmore when this woman's irrelevant voice is long forgotten.

5 posted on 11/09/2002 9:05:22 AM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
We need to be given about twenty years to see if our ideas will work.

We need to be given take about twenty years to see if proove our ideas will work.

6 posted on 11/09/2002 9:05:53 AM PST by Aeronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
Tax cuts for the rich, destruction of the environment, a prescription drug plan that covers only a very small percentage of seniors, an inadequate pension reform bill, an overly aggressive foreign policy

I want a overly-aggressive perscription drug plan that inadequately destroys the environment for the rich.

7 posted on 11/09/2002 9:07:31 AM PST by Perceptive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
I must be bored......else why would I read the ramblings of this idiotic nimcompoop!
8 posted on 11/09/2002 9:07:33 AM PST by Doctor Don
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Don
I must be bored......else why would I read the ramblings of this idiotic nimcompoop!

Yeh. Me too. I notice that this very vocal hollywood dim doesn't offer any clear difference, either - just criticizes. Too funny!

9 posted on 11/09/2002 9:11:07 AM PST by Helen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
Never trust anyone who values a tree more than an unborn child......
10 posted on 11/09/2002 9:11:14 AM PST by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
I'd still like to see the party of FDR, Truman, Scoop Jackson, Sam Nunn, and Hubert Humphrey reappear, then I wouldn't hate them so much.
11 posted on 11/09/2002 9:14:57 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
I'd still like to see the party of FDR, Truman, Scoop Jackson, Sam Nunn, and Hubert Humphrey reappear, then I wouldn't hate them so much.

Unfortunately, the Democrats took a major left turn after the 1968 elections when the Radical Left began to get positions of power in the Party. And now, it will haunt them for years to come.

12 posted on 11/09/2002 9:22:10 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
LOL! Barbra has made the transition to comedy. - yea she's now officially a clown! "Babzo the Clown"
13 posted on 11/09/2002 9:30:02 AM PST by Free_at_last_-2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
Ann Coulter said it all recently when she began her column with the line, "It's hard to say whether election night was worse for Saddam Hussein or Barbra Streisand."

Appreciating Ann Coulter here... http://www.atrentino.com/AppreciatingAnn.html
14 posted on 11/09/2002 9:32:59 AM PST by Davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
This is actually good that they think that the Dim's didn't "have a message." Babs isn't the first one I have heard say that they lost because of this. Please, let them continue to believe this. They will make their voices louder and more shrill in 2004. It will backfire, and they will lose again. You see, the Dims DID have a message, and the people heard it loud and clear. And they REJECTED the message.
15 posted on 11/09/2002 9:35:35 AM PST by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot

The Democratic Party was not able to articulate a clear message

Kind of hard to do when an organinzation is devoid of such to begin with.

- was not able to convey the very real and very many differences between the two parties.

Seemed to be plenty of difference for he American people to make a choice between a party devoid of purpose and message (Democrat), and a party having a clear vision and strong purpose which the American people like(Republican).

They did not allow the American people to make a meaningful choice.

Sure did, and the American people clearly made that choice.

They never articulated what it was we were voting for,

Sure the Democratic party did. Nothing is what the the Democrats were to supposed to vote for according to the Democratic party. They only know how to support a vote against ideas programs and vision, not for such things.

and in doing so they failed to motivate their base to go to the polls.

What base is that pray tell? They were at the polls, whoever were interested in the Democrat's message. The Democrat base are in the minority by there own choice of constituency. Can't of more of something when there aren't any more to be had. DUH!!

16 posted on 11/09/2002 9:40:26 AM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Don; SirFishalot
"I must be bored......else why would I read the ramblings of this idiotic nimcompoop!

Comic relief?

BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Good find, Sir Fishalot!!! ;)

17 posted on 11/09/2002 9:43:18 AM PST by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Perceptive
Tax cuts for the rich, destruction of the environment, a prescription drug plan that covers only a very small percentage of seniors, an inadequate pension reform bill, an overly aggressive foreign policy

Weren't the Dems proposing a tax on the ultra-rich that would have excluded entertainers?

18 posted on 11/09/2002 9:44:50 AM PST by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: SirFishalot
Which part about policy about Iraq don't the democrats like?

We just joined in a 15 nation, unanimous resolution, providing for entirely peaceful settlement, provided Iraq wants such.

Do the democrats want him to KEEP the dangerous weapons?

Do the democrats think their beloved UN shouldn't act in this way?

The truth is, they have been outsmarted, on policy, stratergy and tactics.
20 posted on 11/09/2002 10:28:07 AM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson