Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucson Couple Arrested As "Freemen"
KOLD-TV Tucson ^ | November 6, 2002

Posted on 11/06/2002 10:46:17 AM PST by Shermy

A Tucson couple, who operate under their own courts and laws, is in trouble for taking things too far.

Whitney Starr and her husband, David Vigil, are part of a local group calling themselves "Freemen." They've been arrested for filing several false leins against officials in Oro Valley. It's not clear whether they're related to a group in Montana. This latest incident started when a relative got a ticket last year for driving without a license and registration. The group fought back by going after the officials' property.

John Evans, of the Arizona Attorney General's Office, says, "That ended up with these people assisting and filing enormous leins against police officers, most of the Oro Valley City Council (and) the Mayor, alleging that they owed the Starr's millions of dollars."

The liens were eventually dismissed. Authorities searched a home on the west side Monday and seized some evidence. The couple has been released on their own recognizance. However, police are looking for several other members of the group.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: freemen

1 posted on 11/06/2002 10:46:17 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Oh, shades of the Republic of Texas folks who were doing this a few years ago. Losers.
2 posted on 11/06/2002 10:52:41 AM PST by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
How is this any different than a bunch of sociopath laywers and greedy government bureaucrats filing false claims of damage against the tobacco and gun industries? (other than the shoe is on the other foot)
3 posted on 11/06/2002 10:52:58 AM PST by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
It isn't any different. Barratry is repulsive no matter who engages in it.
4 posted on 11/06/2002 10:56:12 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
How is this any different than a bunch of sociopath laywers and greedy government bureaucrats filing false claims of damage against the tobacco and gun industries?

Yeah, the hypocrisy is pretty sickening isn't it ?

They may have their corner of nutdom all staked out, but these people are at least fighting back at a broken system.

5 posted on 11/06/2002 10:58:24 AM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey
"shades of the Republic of Texas folks"

A lot of these guys were shot. Civil action on their part was countered with firearms.

6 posted on 11/06/2002 11:02:25 AM PST by Deguello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
As a duly empowered officer of the Spelling Police, I hereby declare this article to be under arrest for a Section 12 violation - willfully (and inconsistently) spelling "lien" as "lein"....
7 posted on 11/06/2002 11:09:26 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
John Evans, of the Arizona Attorney General's Office, ...

I especially like this since the state attorneys general were the primary conspirators against the tobacco industry.

8 posted on 11/06/2002 11:12:35 AM PST by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
The question now becomes will King George II (Bush that is) and his new Republican majority pass tort reform? Or will this long overdue bit of legislation (loser pays) die a quiet and unheralded death? This would cut way back on frivolous lawsuits.
9 posted on 11/06/2002 11:15:45 AM PST by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Thanks for the post. He liened me and my law firm.
10 posted on 11/06/2002 11:22:05 AM PST by Greek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
The difference is the lawyers donate mucho bucks to the Rat party.
11 posted on 11/06/2002 11:40:35 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I don't think anyone should be so hard on the "Freemen". I thought they have a lot of guts. From what I read of them some years ago they are taking a stand against some of the unconstitutional laws that have been imposed on U.S. citizens. We are supposed to have a right to travel freely. Traveling is not a privilege it is a necessity. We should not have to pay for liscenses and registrations. This was not the intention of the founding fathers. It's another way for the state to tax us.
12 posted on 11/06/2002 12:58:32 PM PST by arepublicifyoucankeepit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Well, considering we now have about 60 million codes, rules, regulations ,etc. on the books (99.9% of which are unconstitutional) being administered by many of the most corrupt individuals we've seen in this country I think it's way past time for citizens to defend their property and personal liberty.
13 posted on 11/06/2002 1:17:23 PM PST by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
The difference is the lawyers donate mucho bucks to the Rat party.

Yes, well we'll see if the Republicans "walk the walk" now or just come up with another series of excuses as to why they can't reduce government spending cut programs etc. won't we. I personally think that there are more similarities than differences between the two parties, but the Republicans have a chance to prove all of us cynics realists wrong now. I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for it though.

14 posted on 11/07/2002 4:51:35 AM PST by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Popular programs will be easily passed; partial birth abortion is a good example. But remember it only takes 41 senators to filibuster any "radical" legislation.
15 posted on 11/07/2002 5:48:34 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
But remember it only takes 41 senators to filibuster any "radical" legislation

True, but I'll be surprised if any legislation to check runaway government growth and intrusiveness is even introduced. I do expect that the miniscule tax cuts that Bush got through will become permanent, but I wouldn't be surprised if even this falls by the wayside. Let's see if the Republicans have the intelligence to let the semiauto ban expire. Don't hold your breath here either. Getting rid of the National endowment for the arts would show that their hearts are in the right place (wouldn't you love to hear the liberal screams if this were to happen?) but I don't expect this to even hit the radar screen.

16 posted on 11/07/2002 5:54:30 AM PST by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson