Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Opposes Targeted Assassinations
wire.ap.org ^ | 11/05/2002 | Barry Schweid

Posted on 11/05/2002 4:53:11 PM PST by GeneD

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Bush administration renewed its opposition Tuesday to Israel's assassination of terror suspects, even after a U.S. missile killed a top al-Qaida operative and five other people in his car in Yemen.

Sunday's strike in Yemen was the first such overt attack outside Afghanistan and could signal a new U.S. strategy against anti-Western terrorists.

Israel, which pioneered targeting militants for assassination, sometimes also killing and injuring civilians in the attacks, has been admonished publicly and regularly by the State Department for the tactics.

On Tuesday, while declining to discuss the U.S. operation in Yemen, spokesman Richard Boucher said, ``Our policy on targeted killings in the Israeli-Palestinian context has not changed.''

Suggesting the two situations were not comparable, Boucher said, ``The reasons we have given do not necessarily apply in other circumstances.''

While criticizing Israel for targeting suspected Palestinian terrorists, the State Department usually has suggested the preferred approach would be to some form of prosecution.

Also, State Department officials generally have coupled the criticism with calls for restraint while endorsing Israel's right to defend itself.

For the most part, the State Department worries that assassinations contribute to a cycle of violence.

The U.S. assassination of Qaed Salim Sinan al-Harethi and five of his associates Sunday in northwestern Yemen drew criticism from Swedish Foreign Minister Anna Lindh.

``If the U.S.A. is behind this with Yemen's consent, it is nevertheless a summary execution that violates human rights,'' she said. ``If the U.S.A. has conducted the attack without Yemen's permission it is even worse. Then it is a question of unauthorized use of force,'' Lindh told Swedish news agency TT during an official visit to Mexico.

``Even terrorists must be treated according to international law. Otherwise, any country can start executing those whom they consider terrorists,'' she said.

U.S. counterterror officials say al-Harethi was al-Qaida's chief operative in Yemen and a suspect in the October 2000 bombing of the destroyer USS Cole.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: annalindh; palestinians; qaedalharethi; richardboucher; statedepartment; yemen
Sorry that this repeats my earlier post in part.
1 posted on 11/05/2002 4:53:12 PM PST by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
any country can start executing those whom they consider terrorists,'' she said.

Start? When did this person arrive on planet earth?

2 posted on 11/05/2002 4:57:16 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
The U.S. assassination of Qaed Salim Sinan al-Harethi and five of his associates Sunday in northwestern Yemen drew criticism from Swedish Foreign Minister Anna Lindh.

``If the U.S.A. is behind this with Yemen's consent, it is nevertheless a summary execution that violates human rights,'' she said. ...``Even terrorists must be treated according to international law.

Bite me, you hag! "Even terrorists must be treated according to international law..." That's the most asinine statement I've heard in a long time.

3 posted on 11/05/2002 4:59:11 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
... The Bush administration renewed its opposition Tuesday to Israel's assassination of terror suspects, even after a U.S. missile killed a top al-Qaida operative and five other people in his car in Yemen ...
Hey, man. We can't help it if top-ranking al-Qaida commanders keep maneuvering their SUVs in front of our hellfire missiles, man. Or if they keep walking into our bullets. Or keep wandering around where we're dropping precision guided munitions. Or keep falling out of our aircraft after we've captured them. How were we supposed to know they couldn't fly? If they weren't airworthy or bullet proof or impact resistant, they should have said something.
4 posted on 11/05/2002 4:59:27 PM PST by Asclepius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
This is hypocritical. Nothing worse than a hypocrit, and I'm ashamed that part of my government fits that description.

``Even terrorists must be treated according to international law. Otherwise, any country can start executing those whom they consider terrorists,''

I believe terrorists fall under the same category as pirates, subject to attack by the military of any nation, without any such niceties required. If they don't, they should.

5 posted on 11/05/2002 4:59:28 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Say what????

I hope our representatives wink when they say that. You can never be sure at State.

6 posted on 11/05/2002 4:59:50 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Do as I say, not as I do. The State Dept. is so corrupt that it gives the PLO a run for its money.
7 posted on 11/05/2002 5:03:48 PM PST by LarryM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
George can't find Osama, so he'll take any target of opportunity in any country?
8 posted on 11/05/2002 5:06:44 PM PST by Alta Mura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Comrade Richard Boucher has decided what's good for the U.S isn't good for Israel. Listen to him say: "The two situations aren't comparable." Gee whiz, that's about as Orwellian rhetoric as I've ever heard from the bowels of the State Department. I just love targeted assassinations and if its good for the U.S to smoke Al Qaeda terrorists its good for Israel to go after Hamas leaders as well. Screw Comrade Boucher.
9 posted on 11/05/2002 5:06:47 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
It was probably just a matter of trying to prevent a vehicle from polluting the air in that pristine desert. BTW, isn't there some islamic (Radical) religious restriction against using man mande vehicles for transportation?
10 posted on 11/05/2002 5:13:40 PM PST by Brad C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I too oppose targeted assassinations of Jihadists ...hahahaha.
11 posted on 11/05/2002 5:14:23 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alta Mura
Osama has as likely been vaporized.
12 posted on 11/05/2002 5:32:22 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
You may well be correct.

However, George said he would, not he might, not he likely would, etc.

Considering the hazards, if he did consider, I wish he'd talked more like he'd walk. I'm fed up with Washington D.C. suits that make pompous postures and then don't deliver the goods. Including the State Dept. wonk in this article.

The last President earning my trust was G. Washington.
13 posted on 11/05/2002 5:40:42 PM PST by Alta Mura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alta Mura
George can't find Osama, so he'll take any target of opportunity in any country?

Ahem, so are you saying that the snuffing of Osama and Osama only will eliminate the Al-Qaeda threat? Please tell me you aren't this ignorant.

14 posted on 11/05/2002 6:01:09 PM PST by cidrasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cidrasm
No, I'm not assuming any relationship between Osama and Al-Qaeda, those are your words, your assumptions.

What I am suggesting is George made a committment over a year ago and he hasn't delivered on THAT committment, so he'll take credit for any adjacent target. Guess it runs in the family, or runs in his profession.

15 posted on 11/05/2002 6:24:16 PM PST by Alta Mura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Asclepius
LOL
18 posted on 11/05/2002 11:15:34 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson