Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Agents 'Miffed' that Gun Owner Contacted Media
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 11/05/02 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 11/05/2002 3:31:42 AM PST by kattracks

Capitol Hill (CNSNews.com) - Prior to the capture of "Beltway Sniper" suspects John Allen Muhammad and John Lee Malvo, an unconfirmed number of Maryland gun owners received surprise visits from the FBI as part of the investigation. One such gun owner had a surprise of his own for the agents when they arrived at his home.

Jeff Brown of Gaithersburg, Md., was "a little nervous" when he heard the voicemail message from an FBI agent on the sniper task force who wanted to "visit" Brown at his home to check a .223 caliber semi-automatic rifle Brown purchased in 1993. Adding to that apprehension was the fact that Brown owns and drives a full-sized white panel van, the type of vehicle investigators believed the sniper was driving.

"I expected, actually, to be pulled over and spread-eagle on the street at some point," Brown told CNSNews.com Monday. "When he called, I knew their database had had a double hit. A white van and a .223 rifle? I knew they were coming."

In a subsequent telephone conversation, Metzger reportedly told Brown that agents merely wanted to verify the serial number of the rifle and confirm that it was, in fact, still physically in Brown's possession. The two scheduled an appointment to accomplish those goals.

But Brown later learned that the agents had tried at least once to make an unannounced visit, and only called because they were unable to catch him at home.

"Once I told some of my friends in the pro-gun community what was happening, they began to relate some stories to me about guys having their guns confiscated, for so-called 'ballistic fingerprinting,' and not getting their guns back," Brown explained. "I became alarmed."

Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, said the attitude of the federal agents comes as a result of "years of accepting gun control as somehow useful for solving crimes."

"The [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms] went to the stores and got the lists of gun owners that had something that could fire a .223. But, it didn't solve the crime," Pratt noted. "The only reason we find that gun registration is 'useful' is for confiscation."

FBI Agents 'Were Not Happy'

Brown's apprehension prompted him to contact an attorney, who instructed him on preparing for the visit. So, when FBI Special Agent Greg Metzger and his partner arrived at Brown's home for their scheduled meeting, they were greeted by Brown and his wife, Mary, along with reporters and photographers from various media outlets.

As Brown described the situation, the agents were "a little bit miffed."

"They were not happy," he observed. "They just were not interested in being around any cameras."

The agents asked Brown to step outside the home, away from the television crew, to talk.

"Can we, uh ... come here," one of the agents said to Brown. Obliging, Brown stepped away from the door to speak with the agents, but still within view of the camera.

Brown began recapping the agreement he had made with Special Agent Metzger. But when one of the agents realized Brown was wearing a wireless microphone, he stopped the conversation short.

"Do you have a microphone on?" the agent asked as he reached toward the microphone clipped to Brown's shirt. Brown backed away and continued talking, but the agent interrupted him again.

"Can you do me a favor?" the agent asked. "Can you take the apparatus off that you have on? I'd like to speak to you privately."

Brown complied, but only after summoning his wife to serve as a witness to the conversation with the agents. Out of the camera's view, and believing they could not be heard, the agents challenged Brown about the presence of the media.

"They were belligerent, at that point, with me. They weren't threatening me or pushing me around or touching me or anything like that, but their mannerisms and attitude quickly became offended and belligerent," Brown recalled. "I was thinking to myself, 'See, this is what I was afraid would happen if you guys came into my house, especially if I was alone.'"

'Don't You Know People Are Dying?'

Parts of the conversation picked up by the camera's long-range microphone confirm Brown's account of what happened next.

"Why didn't you give us a chance to do what we said we were going to do instead of ambushing us with the media? Why didn't you trust us?" one agent asked.

Brown said it was not so much the words the agents used, as their attitude and body language that made him uncomfortable.

"There was some lecturing about it," he said recalling one comment that did unnerve him.

"One thing they said was, 'Don't you know people are dying and we're just trying to do our job?'" Brown recalled, "Of course, the inference was that I didn't care that there were people dying and I was trying to interfere with them doing their job."

During that conversation, the agents reportedly admitted that they had seized other rifles, allegedly with permission, to compare them to the ballistic evidence gathered from the crime scenes.

"They said, from some people, they do 'request' to take the gun with them and do 'ballistic fingerprinting,' as they call it," Brown recalled. "I just did not want to have my gun disappear."

Pratt believes the agents "developed an attitude," because Brown challenged their attempts to violate his constitutional rights.

"The FBI is trying to put this guy on a guilt trip because he's 'not cooperating' with the system but it's a totally useless system," Pratt argued. "They just assume that gun owners [are] all a bunch of suspects just for being gun owners and they should behave accordingly."

'They Were Doing It On Purpose'

At the request of Special Agent Metzger, Brown instructed the media to stay outside his home, where they could see what was happening through a plate glass window. Brown had the unloaded weapon displayed in plain sight for the inspection.

The agents followed Brown and his wife inside and confirmed the serial number on the rifle as they had said they wanted to do. But that was not the end of the encounter.

"After they checked, they started [questioning Brown again], and that's when my wife stepped in and told them to leave," Brown said, noting that his wife formerly worked in law enforcement.

Mary Brown believed the agents were attempting to agitate her husband, hoping he would say or do something to justify their confiscation of his rifle.

"I could tell that they were doing it on purpose and I didn't like what they were doing to you," she told her husband. "So, I decided to just jump right in."

The agents left the couple's property, as they were ordered to do.

Jeff Brown does not believe the agents' reaction to the presence of the media, or their "brow-beating" tactics were justified.

"I'm not here to make them feel happy. I have to make sure my rights are not violated. I wanted to help, but this is not Nazi Germany," he explained. "I looked [Metzger] right in the eye and said ... 'I don't care whether you're upset about being ambushed by the media. I felt I needed some witnesses here with me.'"

Brown, a member of the National Rifle Association and former candidate for public office in Maryland, was also upset by what he perceived as a lack of honesty on the part of the FBI.

"[Metzger] wasn't upfront with me, and I didn't have any guilty feelings about [contacting the media]," Brown said. "They weren't truthful with me. They didn't tell me all the truth. They only told me the part they wanted to hear."

A Message to Gun Owners?

Debbie Weierman, a spokeswoman for the FBI, said the bureau would not respond to any questions about the encounter, because the probe into the multiple murders was still in progress.

"We're not going to be able to get into any kind of a dialogue with you regarding any aspect of our investigation," she said.

Pratt believes the response of the agents to the presence of the media shows that their main focus was not on finding the "Beltway Sniper," but rather on sending a message to gun owners.

"They know it's not about crime control because, if they were really interested in finding the perpetrator they would have kept moving. Obviously this guy wasn't the guy," Pratt concluded. "What it's really all about is showing that the feds are in control in a very totalitarian sense of the word."

E-mail a news tip to Jeff Johnson.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; jackbootedthugs; marylandtrt; nra; rkba; smileforcamera; sniper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221 next last
To: phasma proeliator
PING
21 posted on 11/05/2002 4:55:01 AM PST by jdogbearhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
really don't see how the FBI/ATF/TLA's intend to win the war on Islamakazis if they don't have/earn the trust of people like this guy.

The peasents' feelings are unimportant to the nobility. The FLEAS can not hope to win any war unless or until they have the active support of the American people. Under the previous administration and for quite a while before an us/them attitude developed in these agencies wher they viewed citizens as the enemy's support system. This was a direct result of the PC middle and upper management in place. It will take a lot of time and effort to fix this. So far there is no investment of either.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

22 posted on 11/05/2002 4:57:53 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: harpseal
Just put the darn piece in the safe. Tell 'em "I can't get it open". They have to get a warrant. Which makes it public record. I respect the jobs cops do, hell, I'm even related to a fed. When it comes to "investigations" that might do me harm...Screw 'em!!!
24 posted on 11/05/2002 5:04:07 AM PST by chadwimc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Why didn't you trust us?

All things considered, such as Ruby Ridge, Waco, and the wholesale giving of sensitive raw data files to a pair of political hacks in the Clinton White House, why should he trust them?

the infowarrior

25 posted on 11/05/2002 5:21:57 AM PST by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Have a large portable recorder that they watch you turn off but keep a small recorder turned on in your pocket!
26 posted on 11/05/2002 5:25:38 AM PST by Chapita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Gee!  All of this time I thought that gun registration information was destroyed shortly after approval for purchase.  Isn't that what they told us?

You are an absolute fool if you comply with ANY attempts to register firearms purchased before the confiscation ploy was placed in force.  Furthermore, you are a fool if you purchase any gun anywhere other than a gun show or by private means that are exempt from registration.

Here in Texas you must show your driver's license to purchase ammo.  Of course, your driver's license is directly connected to your social security number and guess what?   The government circumvented the gun registration process because they know:

We have already given up our liberty and freedoms simply because women and timid males would gladly throw away rights granted by the Constitution and subsequent amendments in exchange for pseudo security granted by "Big Brother."
27 posted on 11/05/2002 5:38:13 AM PST by DH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DH
Thats one damn good reason to reload, not to mention that you can shoot more!!
Jack
28 posted on 11/05/2002 5:47:00 AM PST by btcusn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: chadwimc
Can you say do you have a warrant? I knew you could.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

29 posted on 11/05/2002 5:48:12 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I've seen several reports of these visits, and the question I never see answered is: "How did they know he owned this particular rifle?"

NICS wasn't in force in 1993 and in any case the records, by law, must be destroyed afterwards. No one seems to be investigating and publicizing this!

30 posted on 11/05/2002 5:57:19 AM PST by 6ppc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH
I live in Texas. What the hell are you talking about? I buy ammo all the time without ID and pay cash. In the last week I have purchase .357 mags, .308's, .223's, and .300 Ultra Mags without showing any ID (deer season opened).
31 posted on 11/05/2002 6:04:40 AM PST by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
Hey Vigilant1, this is in Maryland!
Brown's apprehension prompted him to contact an attorney, who instructed him on preparing for the visit. ... The agents asked Brown to step outside the home, away from the television crew, to talk. ... Brown began recapping the agreement he had made with Special Agent Metzger. when one of the agents realized Brown was wearing a wireless microphone, he stopped the conversation short. ... "Do you have a microphone on?" the agent asked as he reached toward the microphone clipped to Brown's shirt. Brown backed away and continued talking, but the agent interrupted him again. "Can you do me a favor?" the agent asked. "Can you take the apparatus off that you have on? I'd like to speak to you privately."
Wow, Viggy ... they FBI did not arrest Brown! Eeven though according to you, in Maryland they often prosecute people who tape conversations without getting the consent of all parties. And Mr. Brown had gotten the advice of an attorney! Gee wiz, maybe those FBI guys need YOU as their legal advisor.

Like you TOLD other people some days ago, according to councillor-wanna-be, you can't tape your own conversations in Maryland. Well maybe, just maybe you gave bad advice. Unsafe advice.

And maybe they don't really prosecute people at all for it in Maryland. That's what I think -- absent that political hound-dogging of Linda Tripp which was eventually completely dismissed. I think it is a ridiculous interpretation of any statute in these United States to hold that a person can't make a recording of any conversation he is a known part of -- especially one with as dread potential consequences as converstaions in this type of circumstance. No decent law can put a person at hazard. My layman's opinion.

32 posted on 11/05/2002 6:07:11 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I would be very interested in seeing a list, broken out by all the usual demographic categories, of folks who were visited during the sniper investigation because they owned .223s and those who had guns “Borrowed” for ballistic fingerprinting. I wonder if there might be some pattern discernable in the types of persons chosen for this special attention.
33 posted on 11/05/2002 6:12:43 AM PST by SWO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"One thing they said was, 'Don't you know people are dying and we're just trying to do our job?'"

It would have been nice if the FBI did their supposed job - and concentrated on the evidence coming in about a dark Caprice instead of using the sniper attacks as justification to pull gun-store records and harass law-abiding gun owners. That is the entire problem - the FBI has been so addled by political correctness that it filters valid evidence and wastes considerable man-hours chasing phantoms of its own creation.

34 posted on 11/05/2002 6:14:12 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamWallace1999
Buy those at Walmart did you? Last time I bought ammo at Walmart that is exactly what I had to go through!
35 posted on 11/05/2002 6:16:04 AM PST by DH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Like you TOLD other people some days ago, according to councillor-wanna-be, you can't tape your own conversations in Maryland.

I have found that such laws are typically passed by corrupt lawmakers who do not want to get caught in a sting operation.

36 posted on 11/05/2002 6:16:09 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 6ppc
"How did they know he owned this particular rifle?"

When you purchase a firearm, you will fill out a 4473 form. At the same time, the Dealer is required to make a entry into his Firearms Log.

The Firearms Log is required for any dealer. The dealer must log in firearms that he takes possesion of and log them out when they leave his business. The log book stays with the dealer untill the business closes for good. The book is then required to be sent to the ATF. The book is considered a Federal Document and is treated as such.

The laws covering the Firearms Log is different than for the Form 4473.

37 posted on 11/05/2002 6:18:56 AM PST by Deguello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Unfortunately, this really isn't about gun control so much as it is about government control and the power of unsubstantiated allegations.

One of my favorite examples,a little over a year old now: Gill McGillicuddy-Click Here

Best regards,

38 posted on 11/05/2002 6:28:42 AM PST by Copernicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deguello
How does one legally acquire a gun without getting recorded in some governmental database?
39 posted on 11/05/2002 6:35:38 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DH
Re: Walmart
If Walmart puts you through an identification ritual that is not required by law, go somewhere else and pay a bit more.
40 posted on 11/05/2002 6:36:00 AM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson