Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voter News Service Tests Poll Info.
Yahoo News ^ | 11/04/02 | David Bauder - AP TV writer

Posted on 11/04/2002 7:40:06 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Politics - AP
Voter News Service Tests Poll Info.
1 hour, 14 minutes ago

By DAVID BAUDER, AP Television Writer

NEW YORK (AP) - Hours before Election Day, Voter News Service said Monday it still hadn't worked all the bugs out of a new system designed to provide media organizations with exit polling information from voters.



Election Special Coverage
News, tools, results and more.

Go now.

As a precaution, NBC and CBS last weekend began conducting their own joint poll of voter attitudes about the midterm election.

VNS, a consortium consisting of ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox and The Associated Press, counts actual votes and also conducts exit polling in certain precincts. That information is used by its members to project winners in individual races on Election Night.

The consortium completely rebuilt its system in response to the 2000 election, when television networks twice used its information to make wrong calls in the decisive Florida vote for the presidential election.

VNS has expressed confidence in its ability to tabulate the votes on Tuesday, though its vote counting process had never been tested in its entirety. VNS members have access to a second, independently conducted vote count by the AP.

VNS also plans to use exit polling of how citizens voted, together with the actual vote count, to help project winners and losers.

Where the system has run into trouble is its attempt to tabulate the results of questions that reflect why voters cast their ballots as they did. VNS has yet to complete a full test of a national voter survey, said Ted Savaglio, VNS executive director.

The consortium will continue to test the system into Election Day, he said.

That information is considered vital to fleshing out the reasons behind the electorate's vote, and is of particular importance to the 19 newspapers that have contracted with the consortium for that information.

The nervousness of some media members about the system was reflected in the new CBS and NBC poll, which gathered voter attitudes about issues Saturday through Monday.

"We remain hopeful that VNS will provide the national poll," said NBC News spokeswoman Barbara Levin. "However, as a precaution, NBC News has been doing our own national polling and we are prepared to use that information."

CBS News spokeswoman Sandra Genelius described the new poll as a backup. CBS has considered all along that the rebuilding of VNS would be a four-year process and that the system won't be as complete this election.

"The parts that we are confident in, we'll use," she said. "The parts that we are not confident in, we will not use."

ABC News also said it was prepared to go on Election Night without VNS exit polling information. "Any information about which we have any doubt will simply be set aside," spokesman Jeffrey Schneider said.



TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: poll; vns; voternewsservice

1 posted on 11/04/2002 7:40:06 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Real American play games with pollsters questions on election day.
2 posted on 11/04/2002 7:46:37 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It was said that VNS played a large part in the misleading reports of the networks in 2000. Presumably they represent their sponsors, all of whom but Fox work for the Democrats.
3 posted on 11/04/2002 7:53:49 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The 2000 situation was indeed something. The VNS picks representative precincts that consistantly reflect the out come. They don't have to exactly total the results, just be proportional. That is if the final democratic vote is highter this precinct is higher. If the Democratic vote is lower it goes lower.

Let us say a precinct goes 60to 40 democrat when the state is exactly 50- 50. If that precinct is going 57 to 43 it could indicate a Repubican victory. Several precincts like this can accurately project a race.

What VNS does is interview voters as they leave the bellweather precincts after voting. That is the exit poll. Then when the votes get counted they compare the actual votes in these precincts with the exit polls. If they agree they call the race.

That is what was supposed to have happened in Florida. But the actual vote counts reported to VNS and the exit polls were wrong. You see if the exit polls don't match the actual votes in the same precincts then they dare not call the race. To call them in 2000, meant both sets of numbers were faked by someone.

VNS comes into a community before the election. They run an add in the help wanted section. They interview and hire applicants to do the exit polls. They would have a few hours training and out they go out on election day to poll.. I use to see them at the polls and at the board of elections on election night. Sometimes I would chat with them before I went on the air. They would tell me how the precincts they polled went. They would be calling in actual board of election counts as I broadcast them on the air.

What had to happen in 2000 was the exit pollers and the the people who called in the results had to be in on a fix. They turned in both fake exit polls and fake precinct results. Or someone at VNS played with the called in numbers. There is no other explanation.

The fake results were what promted bush to call the networks to tell them they were wrong. The VNS results had to be fake because all the networks fell for it. People are quick to blame the networks. But I think VNS was compromised. I think that is why the networks are doing some of their own result gathering this time. They want to know if VNS has been compromised again. I don't think they can know, so they re doing back up. I am sure that both VNS and the networks covered up the invasion of VNS by the Democratic dirty tricks crew. But that did not mean it did not happen.

4 posted on 11/04/2002 8:08:13 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Have they posted the winners yet?
5 posted on 11/04/2002 8:13:07 PM PST by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alaskanfan
It's Al Gore by a nose .. in a photo finish ..OOps sorry. wrong script !!

No .. and they had 4 years to do it, too!
6 posted on 11/04/2002 8:20:02 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Mid-Terms are a bitch to begin with, and now, especially when Mr. Bush, a very popular president, is out campaigning vigorously to make a real statement for change in Washington.

He da man!

Let's hope the demRats flush Clinton and his crew of malcontents after they find themselves relegated to 3rd World status in Congress.
7 posted on 11/04/2002 8:24:33 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Why the heck can't we just wait until Wednesday morning until all the ACTUAL votes are counted? I think we can all survive the short wait, no?
8 posted on 11/04/2002 8:27:55 PM PST by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
What happens when most voters refuse to talk to VNS? I personally despise VNS.
9 posted on 11/04/2002 8:37:45 PM PST by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver
I doubt if very many voters do refuse to talk to VNS.

They have had little trouble in the past. I was retired before the 1996 and 2000 elections but from 1980 until 1992 I on several occasions did election day reports on my radio show about the VNS pollsters.

They were very accurate in 80, 84, 88 and 92. I was not in the media in 96 but I believe they were accurate then too.

I think that Democratic operatives decided to screw with the VNS results. There was no way that either VNS or the networks wanted to be wrong. They will try to bias the news but they would not have anyting to gain by lying about results.

You'll recall that Jimmy Carter conceded to Reagan in 1980 at 6:40Pm EST. That was at 3:40Pm Pacific time and almost 3 hours before the polls closed on the west coast.

The Democrats screamed but there was zero evidence that it cost the Democrats any votes on the west coast. They claimed it did, but the ratios of the east coast to the west coast were perfectly normal. There was zero evidenct that Carter giving up 10 minutes after the polls closed on the east coast had any effect on the results anywhere else.

AS far as a few people reusing to talk. They compare actual results to the exit poll results.

It is not to hard for VNS to figure out how the people that refuse to talk to VNS voted.


10 posted on 11/04/2002 9:05:42 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Thanks for your thoughtful reply. Your insider perspective is a great asset for FR.

One thing that can make it harder for VNS is absentee ballots and vote-by-mail-only like they have in Oregon.

11 posted on 11/04/2002 10:08:14 PM PST by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
As a precaution, NBC and CBS last weekend began conducting their own joint poll of voter attitudes about the midterm election.

Completely useless. Exit polls only matter when taken AT POLL EXITS.

VNS needs to be closed down, and the networks need to go back to running their own individual exit polling operations. And I predict that VNS will again screw up so much tomorrow that at least one network will pull out permanently, go it alone in 2004 ... and be far more accurate than VNS.

12 posted on 11/05/2002 12:18:13 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
VNS needs to be closed down, and the networks need to go back to running their own individual exit polling operations. And I predict that VNS will again screw up so much tomorrow that at least one network will pull out permanently, go it alone in 2004 ... and be far more accurate than VNS.

Dump Davi$ BUMP
13 posted on 11/05/2002 9:29:42 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson