Replies

It's easy to sit on the sidelines and make your criticisms, and I welcome them, but if you posted your version of "the facts" then we could see how well your positions stood the test of time.

What in the world do you mean by my "version of 'the facts'"?????????? You mean the great Jim Puplava actually did include the 3.1% growth number in his precise little piece of propaganda. I stated a verifiable fact, and you have the nerve to imply that I am making something up as "my version of the facts". What the heck are you talking about? Facts are facts.

"What in the world do you mean by my "version of 'the facts'"?????????? You mean the great Jim Puplava actually did include the 3.1% growth number in his precise little piece of propaganda."

Calm down. You disagree with everything that the WrapUp posits. I merely suggested that you post your own version of reality. Also, as I posted to LS the 3.1% growth number was considered a "disappointment" by CNBC. It may be a big deal to you but not to everyone. Also, HALF of that growth was driven by auto sales which were being pumped up by (unprofitable) 0% financing.

This just in:

CHICAGO (CBS.MW) -- U.S. auto sales in October slumped as double-digit declines from most makers indicated the power of aggressive discounts and loans is waning in the face of economic uncertainty.

That is the most recent news. Post your own report, please, if you are so right about everything...