Skip to comments.
Whistleblower Points to Illegal Klamath Water Decision
Environmental News Service ^
| 10/28/2002
Posted on 10/29/2002 12:17:00 PM PST by cogitator
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Yet another example of what happens when the Federal government works against landowners rather than for them.
1
posted on
10/29/2002 12:17:00 PM PST
by
cogitator
To: cogitator
A bureaucratic dictatorship has very little respect for property rights.
2
posted on
10/29/2002 12:24:15 PM PST
by
meenie
To: meenie
You had best reread the article very carefully. That guy wanted more water to be released for the socalled endangerd salmon. That means less water for farmers.
3
posted on
10/29/2002 12:37:15 PM PST
by
cksharks
To: cogitator
He means they need to do another "scientific" study like the Lynx one to prove that the fish need more water - like how dare they say the farmers can get more water...
4
posted on
10/29/2002 12:49:29 PM PST
by
trebb
To: cogitator
ENS: "All the propaganda, all the time"
TM (ENS).
http://www.austin360.com/aas/news/ap/ap_story.html/National/AP.V9789.AP-Klamath-Salmon.html
"...Kelly's supervisor, Jim Lecky, acknowledged Saturday that ``there is interest all the way up to the White House ... but there wasn't pressure to do anything that wasn't supported by all the available science.''
Lecky said he is satisfied the review team followed proper procedures.
Kelly alleges the final plan won't provide sufficient water for threatened coho salmon ``until the ninth year of the 10-year plan,'' which he said jeopardizes the species' ability to survive. Recommended flows were cut by 43 percent; the final plan addresses the shortfall by promising creation of a multi-agency task force to find more water.
The reduced level was based on a study by a division of the National Academy of Sciences. The Interior Department trimmed the river's flow based on that study, reversing its decision to cut off irrigation water to Klamath Basin farmers two summers ago to safeguard threatened and endangered fish.
Kelly objected to basing NMFS' report on that outside study; Lecky said he was satisfied with it. "
5
posted on
10/29/2002 12:56:50 PM PST
by
mrsmith
To: *Klamath_List; *biofraud; farmfriend; madfly; AAABEST
To: cogitator
and the result is over 30,000 dead salmon.Who counts them ? How many are natural ?
To: cogitator
ummmm. Except that the original levels set didn't follow guidelines for determining proper levels either - so legally they were non-existent.
8
posted on
10/29/2002 1:32:34 PM PST
by
lepton
To: VRWC_minion
no one counted them, so there was nothing to base the original regs on.
9
posted on
10/29/2002 1:35:06 PM PST
by
lepton
To: mrsmith
Thanks for that information. The interpretation will probably hinge on whether what the NAS did constitutes a "biological analysis".
To: VRWC_minion
and the result is over 30,000 dead salmon.
Who counts them ? How many are natural ?
Don't they die anyway after swimming up the klamath and spawning? Perhaps 30,000 made the trek, spawned, and died.
11
posted on
10/29/2002 2:12:10 PM PST
by
GoldMan
To: VRWC_minion
and the result is over 30,000 dead salmon.
Who counts them ? How many are natural ?
Don't they die anyway after swimming up the klamath and spawning? Perhaps 30,000 made the trek, spawned, and died.
12
posted on
10/29/2002 2:12:43 PM PST
by
GoldMan
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Stand Watch Listen; freefly; expose; Fish out of Water; .30Carbine; ...
ping
13
posted on
10/29/2002 2:29:12 PM PST
by
madfly
To: madfly
Watch this become a matter of National Security.
14
posted on
10/29/2002 2:49:21 PM PST
by
Eustace
To: cogitator
IT'S 7 DAYS UNTIL THE ELECTION. WILL IT STILL BE HER SENATE?
GOOD INTENTIONS DON'T WIN ELECTIONS.
ACTION DOES. ACT TODAY.
TakeBackCongress.org
A resource for conservatives who want a Republican majority in the Senate
To: cogitator
Did I read this right...the BoR actually tried to avoid cutting the farmers off by lowering the "bar" under which the fish would die?
EBUCK
16
posted on
10/29/2002 3:02:02 PM PST
by
EBUCK
To: cogitator
The saddest part about this story is that the salmon may have been killed by water releases from the dams at the behest of these very bureaucrats. It would seem that they are trying to destory this fishery as well as the farmers, and then discover their "mistake" after the farmers are gone.
To: trebb
Regardless of the motivation, the law is the law. If these jokers can't even respect their own laws and imposed their will illegally on people, guess what? I would say there is a potential lawsuit here.
To: EBUCK
No, it's worse. The BoR thinks that the fish need more summer water and happen to be totally wrong. It may have been excessive water flow released from dams that brought the fish into the river to die.
To: Carry_Okie
Where do I know that name, Michael Kelly from????? This is a bunch of balderdash.
20
posted on
10/29/2002 5:03:15 PM PST
by
AuntB
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson