[Dimensio]

Funny way evos have of dismissing evidence. So long as someone does not accept it, it does not count.

My point was that the scientist making the claim regarding birds and dinosaurs simply believes that evolution occured differently than the method commonly accepted. My statement had nothing to do with denying the claim regarding birds and dinosaurs. As usual, your response has nothing to do with what I actually said and only to do with what you pretend that I said.

[gore3000]

My point was ...

No, that was not your point. Your point was that because the discoverer of this is still an evolutionist the evidence does not disprove another evolutionist assumption. Every day we see more and more evolutionst assumptions disproven. If evolution were science then the findings of science would be proving evolutionist assumptions. They are not, they are disproving them.