[gore3000]

My point was ...

No, that was not your point. Your point was that because the discoverer of this is still an evolutionist the evidence does not disprove another evolutionist assumption. Every day we see more and more evolutionst assumptions disproven. If evolution were science then the findings of science would be proving evolutionist assumptions. They are not, they are disproving them.

[Dimensio]

Your point was that because the discoverer of this is still an evolutionist the evidence does not disprove another evolutionist assumption.

The evidence is evidence a common assumption regarding evolutionary descent. I admit it here, and I never stated otherwise. Of course, you're known for lying about the statements of others, so your misrepresentation of my words is no surprise.