[gore3000]

Wait, the scientist who made the discovery isn't a creationist. He just think that the evolution of birds did not result from them splintering from dinosarus but from a much older common ancestor.

Guess this isn't a point for creationists after all. Whoops.

Funny way evos have of dismissing evidence. So long as someone does not accept it, it does not count. The point is that evolutionist assumptions keep being discredited. The missing links keep getting pushed back further and further because they keep getting disproved. In short, the links are never found, the evidence is not there, but anyone who does not believe in evolution is a fool! Seems evolutionists are just ideologues who refuse to face the facts.

[jejones]

Dismissing evidence? Who's doing that? All I see here is science working the way it should, with errors being found out and corrected. If science worked like religion, whoever turned up the evidence would be threatened with torture or burned at the stake, and nobody would have to change their point of view just because of some pesky facts.

[Dimensio]

Funny way evos have of dismissing evidence. So long as someone does not accept it, it does not count.

My point was that the scientist making the claim regarding birds and dinosaurs simply believes that evolution occured differently than the method commonly accepted. My statement had nothing to do with denying the claim regarding birds and dinosaurs. As usual, your response has nothing to do with what I actually said and only to do with what you pretend that I said.