[Dimensio]

Yet another set back for the improbable theory of creative causation... that's evolution for lay persons.

Well, I think that the creationist scientist who made the discovery put it better when he said...

Wait, the scientist who made the discovery isn't a creationist. He just think that the evolution of birds did not result from them splintering from dinosarus but from a much older common ancestor.

Guess this isn't a point for creationists after all. Whoops.

[gore3000]

Wait, the scientist who made the discovery isn't a creationist. He just think that the evolution of birds did not result from them splintering from dinosarus but from a much older common ancestor.

Guess this isn't a point for creationists after all. Whoops.

Funny way evos have of dismissing evidence. So long as someone does not accept it, it does not count. The point is that evolutionist assumptions keep being discredited. The missing links keep getting pushed back further and further because they keep getting disproved. In short, the links are never found, the evidence is not there, but anyone who does not believe in evolution is a fool! Seems evolutionists are just ideologues who refuse to face the facts.

[That Subliminal Kid]

Since I'm not a "creationist" I really don't care what is or isn't a "point" for them.