Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Napolitano soft on national security, Salmon says
The Arizona Republic ^ | Oct. 22, 2002 | Robbie Sherwood

Posted on 10/22/2002 6:01:30 AM PDT by madfly

Now trailing in public opinion polls, Republican Matt Salmon on Monday launched one of his strongest attacks yet against front-runner Janet Napolitano during a live debate by suggesting she cares more about endangered species than national security.

Salmon confronted Napolitano, a Democrat and the state's attorney general, about her refusal to back federal legislation that would exempt military bases from certain environmental laws. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had asked all state attorneys general for their backing this summer. But Salmon said Napolitano was one of only seven attorneys general who said the laws are needed to force the military to clean up its pollution.

"These are reasonable and minor exclusions to protect our military readiness," Salmon told Napolitano before the packed auditorium at Mesa's Dobson High School in the League of Women Voters debate. "We are about to go to war. What's more important, endangered species or our safety?"

Napolitano called Salmon's conclusion "unfair" and said that more than 30 of her colleagues from around the nation now oppose rolling back environmental laws that would exempt the military from costs totaling $39 billion for cleanups on their property, including the removal of unexploded bombs.

"I understand and appreciate the role of the military, but as a Western state, there are a number of installations that have left tons of ammunition to clean up," Napolitano said. "We are in litigation to clean that up."

The rest of the debate focused on the primary issues of the campaign: the budget deficit, education and plans for stimulating the economy. But Napolitano, Salmon and Libertarian Barry Hess all took time to chastise Independent Richard Mahoney for his television ads. Mahoney's ads feature a former resident of Colorado City who suggests Salmon would do nothing to stop child abuse and polygamy in a fundamentalist offshoot of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints because he is a mainstream Mormon. The ads also accused Napolitano of doing little or nothing as a prosecutor to stop the abuse.

"It's sad that someone would use religious bigotry to get ahead," Salmon said.

Hess called the ads "embarrassing," but added, "I'm curious why the Attorney General's Office hasn't stopped (polygamy)."

Napolitano defended her ongoing investigation.

"The injection of Matt's personal beliefs into the campaign was outrageous," Napolitano said. "Colorado City should be dealt with as a law enforcement issue, and it is."

Mahoney said the crimes he discovered in Colorado City were too serious to ignore and he has no regrets about the strategy.

"Women had gone to the Attorney General's Office and complained and nothing happened," Mahoney said. "They had gone to the Salmon campaign as well. We gave them a voice, and I'm proud we did."



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizonagovrace; esa; janetnapolitano; mattsalmon

1 posted on 10/22/2002 6:01:31 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; Spiff; cardinal4; ValerieUSA; Republicus2001; joltinjoe; KSCITYBOY; GlesenerL; ...
ping
2 posted on 10/22/2002 6:03:42 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert; Carry_Okie
FYI
3 posted on 10/22/2002 6:08:13 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
A poll last weekend from ASU put Salmon and NapoliReno at a dead heat; supposely the latest Rocky Mountain Poll just came out showing Salmon 16% behind NapoliReno.

If Salmon is behind, I'm not surprised--the Arizona Republic with its FemiNazi anti-Salmon editorial board has acted as Janet's propaganda machine. It's disgusting.

4 posted on 10/22/2002 6:23:16 AM PDT by RooRoobird14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Janet Napolitano's career has been to obtain power; much like Mrs. Clinton, anyway she can get it. She is a tax and spend Democrat, one who heavily favors the EPA, more rules and regulations but has little to offer Arizona. Her stand on home schooling is a little frightening. I seriously doubt she would make an even passably good governor for this state. She is the typical Democratic Party yes person; she has done little out of her current office to help Arizonians.

The term “front runner” is pure spin.

5 posted on 10/22/2002 6:35:17 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly; dittomom
I watched the debate. That smooth bit-h actually referred to herself as a conservative. I hope Arizonans see through her.

El Napo would be a disaster for our state.

6 posted on 10/22/2002 7:50:45 AM PDT by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madfly
I CAN'T VOTE.

PLEASE, HELP TAKE BACK THE SENATE.
IT'S FOR THE PUPPIES!

TakeBackCongress.org

A resource for conservatives who want a Republican majority in the Senate

7 posted on 10/22/2002 7:56:14 AM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert; madfly
I heard most of the debate. I'm glad Matt took the gloves off and called her on this thing about the military bases. There is NO WAY she can get away with calling herself a conservative.

There's another debate at 7PM tonight on the PBS station - Channel 8 (KAET) here in the Phoenix area.

GO MATT, GO!!!

8 posted on 10/22/2002 7:59:49 AM PDT by dittomom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dittomom
Arizona has a weak governorship..the power is in the legislature which will stay Rep.....therefore Nappy would probably be a political neuter.
9 posted on 10/22/2002 8:54:11 AM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: madfly
It is very sad that Napolitano is so competitive. I don't know whether it is because of

a) changing demographics with so many immigrants from mexico

b) because some republicans strongly dislike the conservatives and will switch to dem when a conservative like Salmon wins on the republican side

c) people are fed up with the republican leadership that allowed such destructive tax credits under Hull and want to make a statement over it.

Probably all 3 of these are factors as well as that Janet is slick, she projects a good image. I'm with Matt all the way though.
10 posted on 10/22/2002 9:09:31 AM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones
"Clean" elections are a BIG factor. Andrew Thomas won the primary with clean election money; put out all kinds of nasty commercials, and left a bad taste in the mouth of lots of Republicans, including conservatives who were appalled by the hateful way he campaigned.

Having this arrogant Harvard grad on the ticket does NOT help Matt.

11 posted on 10/22/2002 9:16:20 AM PDT by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones
Too many immigrants from Cali and Chicago!!
12 posted on 10/22/2002 11:19:45 AM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yoe
I have never heard her views with regard to homeschooling. Care to share her views so we'll all know? Thanks!!
13 posted on 10/22/2002 4:41:56 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson