Posted on 10/22/2002 2:11:30 AM PDT by sarcasm
PORTLAND, Ore. - The voters here have the chance to create the first universal health-care system in the nation - one where everybody would receive medical coverage for everything, from massage therapy and marriage counseling to brain surgery and long-term care.
The sponsors of the November ballot initiative acknowledge their plan is audacious, but they contend that the health-care system is headed toward a meltdown brought about by rising numbers of uninsured individuals and spiraling costs.
< SNIP >
The measure could pass: The most recent polling, by the Portland Tribune, found that 36 percent approved of the plan, 39 percent opposed it, and 25 percent were undecided, with a margin of error of 4 percentage points. The initiative was winning among Democrats and women, and trailing with men, Independents, and Republicans. An earlier poll by The Oregonian newspaper found 49 percent against the measure and 40 percent for it, with the remainder undecided.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
Um, let's see here. The current plan, with state sponsored euthanasia, is running out of money. To solve the problem, the program will be vastly expanded in scope, vastly increasing costs. A progressive tax increase will be slapped on the economy to pay for it, sapping the economy of vitality. So, if your head hurts when you bang it against the wall, you bang it harder against a harder wall?
Hint: Oregon voters, look at Tenn Care in Tennesee.
Prediction: Oregon will go into default, and economic depression within five years.
Like shooting fish in a barrel . . .
This is not likely to pass, though. The proponents have no money, and the opponents have lots of money, and they've only recently started running ads against it.
Oregon is a small state, and we don't get much good polling here. Also, you musn't believe everything you read in the Washington Post. :-)
Two measures to watch are Measures 21 & 22, which would change the way we elect judges. 21 would allow voters to have a choice of "None of the above", so that there is at least some alternative to judges running unopposed. 22 would provide for the election of Court of Appeals and Supreme Court justices by district, to lessen the influence of Portland and Salem on the higher courts, which they now dominate with blatantly political liberal judges.
But if it does, it will be very instructive to other states. Expect to see some pretty stringent residency requirements within a short period.
That figures. The tax-takers are for it and the tax-payers are against it.
Personally, I hope that it passes. In a couple of years the state budget will be such a disaster that we may never again hear of "universal single-payer" health care coverage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.