MUSICAL CANDIDATES

The Logical View ^ | 10/20/02 | Mark A Sity

[logic101.net]

MUSICAL CANDIDATES? 10/20/02

Ok, let's look at this. Forster was running against "The Torch". Forester was winning due to the corruption of "The Torch". Much of Forester's campaign revolved around "The Torch's" corruption. So, "The Torch" hands off to "The Louse", who if he wins will probably resign to be replaced by NJ's Democratic Governor. Recently Forester had a debate, against "The Louse"? Nope, against "The Mouth"; Carville! This is the weirdest election I have ever seen.

Back to "The Mouth" though, how can anyone "debate" against him? He will not allow anyone else to speak (I feel sorry for his wife). His words are largely unintelligible, and those few phrases that can be interpreted from his "speech" make little or no sense. If I were to debate him, I'd insist on a few rules. 1) He is gagged when it's my turn to speak. 2) I have a transcript of his latest comments 3) I am restrained so that I can't walk up to him and slap the snot out of him.

Who is the "real" candidate the Dems are keeping in hiding? Is it Bill Clinton? Nah, they'd be happy to trot him out. It is obvious they are hiding someone in the background though, someone who has no chance of getting elected; who will damage the nation by obstructing everything the President proposes. Maybe it's Janet Reno? Hmmm, she has a track record of damaging the nation (Waco, Ruby Ridge, the Cuban boy).

I feel sorry for Mr. Forester; gezz, he must get confused!

MARK A SITY

[nickcarraway]

Lautenberg gets to use Torricelli's commercials against Forrester, but Forrester has to make new commercials.