Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jewish settlers defy Israeli army to protect tent city
Injdependent UK ^ | 17 October 2002 | Justin Huggler

Posted on 10/16/2002 7:32:02 PM PDT by Asmodeus

Two thousand Jewish settlers brought the Israeli army to a grinding halt yesterday.

The settlers, many carrying guns, converged around a cluster of tents and mobile homes on a hill in the West Bank to protect them from Israeli soldiers who had been ordered to dismantle them.

The Jewish settlement, Havat Gilad, is named after Gilad Zar, who was killed by Palestinian militants in 2001.

Settlements cover the hilltops of the West Bank and usually militants attack them and the Israeli army defends them. But unlike other settlements, Havat Gilad was set up without the permission of the government.

The United States has called for an end to settlement building and President George Bush is putting pressure on Ariel Sharon, the Israeli Prime Minister, to relieve conditions on the Palestinians. Binyamin Ben Eliezer, the Israeli Defence Minister, has also made dismantling the illegal settlements his personal project. So far, the army has taken down several unpopulated outposts.

Havat Gilad was the first settlement scheduled for dismantling. But the army ran into trouble when settlers arrived in their hundreds. An Israeli television channel said its film crew was attacked and there were reports a Red Cross worker was attacked.

Gilad Zar's father, Moshe Zar, reportedly agreed to leave the settlement yesterday. But hardline settlers continued to protest. They agreed to disperse after negotiating a deal with the Defence Ministry that allows them to farm the land but leave at night.

The settlers believe God gave the Jewish people all the land in Israel including the West Bank. The Palestinians believe the settlements are robbing them of the 22 per cent of historic Palestine that is left to them.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: isarel; mideast; settlers; war

1 posted on 10/16/2002 7:32:03 PM PDT by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
The deal is better than nothing. Sooner or later Binyamin Ben Eliezer will be gone and the Jewish town will be a matter of fact. Not even an Israeli Leftist can stand in the way of Jewish history and Ben Eliezer can either accept that he can't win or get along with the program.
2 posted on 10/16/2002 7:34:56 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Bad attitude. Be though when you must, but pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered.
3 posted on 10/16/2002 8:16:16 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Funny thing is the settlement is surrounded by Arab settlements but the IDF spends more time worrying about the Jews following the government’s laws than the Arabs stop killing the Jews. When this finally gets to war, the IDF can spend time being soldiers instead of playing police for the newspapers.

My only question in this whole thing is why negotiate at this point? What is more crazy, a guy that straps a bomb on him self, or a politician that wants to reason with him? A political group that publicly states murder is part of their policy needs to be destroyed, not bargained with.
4 posted on 10/16/2002 10:08:00 PM PDT by American in Israel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson