These words can't quite describe the 'prophet of peace' Islam is NOT a religion, it's a disease and it must be eliminated"
While I agree with you that the Quran is full of contradictions, this is really not what concerns me the most.
What causes me deep concern and what I find most troubling is that Islam calls for the overthrowing of secular governments and the killing of infidels. Islam calls for the destruction of democracy and the establishment of a theocracy.
Why is it that the United States allows a so-called "religion" that openly calls for anarchy, murder, destruction of democracy and capitalism. Islam seeks ultimately to destroy the West from within.
Many people worldwide think that the conflicts by the terrorist organizations are simply caused by religious extremists. It is not really religious extremism which motivates these people. It is entirely "political extremism" and should be viewed as such.
The ultimate goal of ALL of these organizations (Al Qaeda, Taliban, etc.) is for the establishment of an Islamic state and the Western world is the battlefield.
How would the West have ever defeated Communism or Nazism if Karl Marx or Adolph Hilter had actually gift wrapped their idealologies as a "religion" instead of a political idealology? America's "Freedom of Religion" would have prevented us from ever taking any action against another "religion", a political idealology though is an entirely different matter. Islam is not making the same mistake made by Communism in the past.
Communists tried to take over the world in the same way that Islam is. The only difference it seems is communism was no viewed as a religion.
Islam is nothing more than a theocratic form of government disguised as a religion. The Quran is basically the Constitution for Muslims. Each and every aspect of an individuals life is prescribed for by the Quran. There is no need for secular laws or a penal code in Islam, all is prescribed for. Muslims themselves will tell you that Islam is not merely a religion but rather a "way of life" and in effect, an idealology no different in that respect from Communism, Nazism or Fascism.
So called "Muslim and Middle East experts" will tell you that there are two types of Muslims. The moderates and the extremists, ie. "the good and the bad". This is not only wrong but it is misleading as well. People always ask, "Where is the outrage? The condemnation from the "moderate" muslims?" from the terrorist acts that happen so frequently. The reason you see no condemnation is because there is none.
Was there ever such a thing as different types of Communism or different types of Nazism? A good and bad?
My concerns are not really about whether Mohammed was a pedophile or a scumbag, my concerns are for the greater threat that the West seems to have overlooked.