Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trickyguy
I may be wrong about this, but I have read the Supreme Court has ruled that no one has to have a driver's license.

You are wrong about this. The US Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld a state's authority to require that all motorists be licensed, be insured, etc.

26 posted on 10/15/2002 6:24:52 AM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DonQ
You are wrong about this. The US Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld a state's authority to require that all motorists be licensed, be insured, etc.

Can you cite a couple of cases?

74 posted on 10/15/2002 8:46:38 AM PDT by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: DonQ
You are wrong about this. The US Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld a state's authority to require that all motorists be licensed, be insured, etc.

Well, we're starting to get into that gray area where lawyers make money, and scumbag sexual predators can argue about the definition of the word "is".

Just because a state can require that all motorists be licensed, it doesn't mean that everyone has to have a driver's license. Some people have no need for a driver's license, because they don't drive. That doesn't make them criminals.

Personally, I think this guy was looking for an excuse to try to pull some stunt like this. I think he wants media attention.

87 posted on 10/15/2002 9:48:28 AM PDT by JavaTheHutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson