Posted on 10/15/2002 4:52:49 AM PDT by twntaipan
Local psychologist believes sniper kills done by terrorists By J.J. Stambaugh, News-Sentinel staff writer October 15, 2002
The recent sniper shootings in the Washington, D.C., area are probably terrorist attacks rather than the work of a traditional "spree killer," according to a local psychologist who specializes in violent behavior.
Dr. Helen Smith, a forensic psychologist and author of the book "The Scarred Heart," earned her doctorate from the University of Tennessee in 1994. She often is called to testify as an expert witness in Juvenile Court proceedings; in "The Scarred Heart," she dedicated a chapter to the 1997 Lillelid murder case in Greene County, and she is currently making a documentary on the slayings.
"This is most likely a terrorist act, that's my take on it," Smith said of the D.C.-area shootings, which began Oct. 2 and have claimed the lives of eight people so far. "It's not typical, it just doesn't really meet any of the profiles we look at."
While law enforcement officials say they aren't releasing detailed information about the shootings because of concerns about tipping off possible suspects, Smith said the very nature of the attacks sets them apart from other instances of mass homicide.
"It looks to me like there's more than one person involved, and spree killers generally act alone," she said. "They will normally be in their thirties or forties, male, unemployed - a loner type. Usually, there's also a divorce or other relationship problem.
"But my guess is that there's more than person operating here, a driver and the person doing the shooting. There might even be different teams."
According to Smith, the apparently random nature of the shootings may provide clues as to the shooter's motivations. Serial killers, for instance, tend to single out people of a specific gender, age and ethnic group and often try to strike up a rapport with their prospective victims, Smith said.
"Serial killers are usually practiced and accomplished at what they do, they have normal and acceptable social behavior," she said. "They are usually sexually motivated. They'll get into a fantasy world where they fantasize about a certain kind of person: co-eds, (Playboy) Bunnies, or even homosexual boys, as in the case of Jeffrey Dahmer.
"But spree killers are obviously not getting to know their victims. It's a distance thing - they're disassociating themselves from their victims."
Smith mentioned the 1966 case of Charles Whitman, who shot and killed 14 people and injured dozens more from the top of the University of Texas Tower in Austin as an example of a traditional spree killer: someone who engages in a short, violent killing spree that generally ends with their own death or capture.
According to Smith, the real target of the sniper or snipers in the Washington area is the larger community rather than individuals.
"The anger's not toward the victims, it's toward the community," she said. "People use guns because you can step back, make it impersonal. They're probably not even seeing these people as actual people, but as things or objects used to further their goal, whatever their goal is."
Smith also said the degree of planning, skill and patience needed to sustain the attacks for an extended period of time also leads her to suspect terrorists.
"This is too calculated," she said. "It's cool, it's calm, and it's from a distance. It doesn't sound like the work of a maniac."
Smith also speculated that the investigating police agencies aren't publicly commenting on the possibility that terrorists are behind the shootings because they don't want to hurt the public's morale.
"They're not giving us much information," she said. "They don't want to tell us that because they don't want people to panic ."
No matter what the facts of the case ultimately turn out to be, Smith said one thing is obvious: The shooter or shooters enjoy the attention they're getting.
"This is a person who wants power over the population at large," she said. "They are watching the news . They do a hit and then go home and watch it on TV."
J.J. Stambaugh may be reached at 865-342-6307 or stambaugh@knews.com
The only question in my mind is "what's his goal?" Is he Al Queda? Some ultra-right nutjob? A radical leftist (it's possible...)? Someone who just didnt like what was on TV?
I think we'll find out soon; looks like the police down there arent telling us everything. (Thank God.)
Why would you wonder that?
Well we seem to develop certain constructs in our mind and cannot seem to assimilate anything that happens outside of that realm.
As an example GWB immediately attributed the bombings in Bali to terrorism although no terrorist group has claimed reasonability for that. Why, because they used a bomb? So the construct is that for something to be terrorism, a bomb must be involved.
I think the world we are living in is much more fluid than that. We need to quickly learn how to be fluid with it.
It was said that school children were safe, so next was a school child.
It was said something like this person is acting like he is God in taking lives. Tarot card with Mister policeman, "I am God."
Now I don't remember if I heard this on the news or read it on FR, but it was said people should be sure to go to stores where there are parking garages because it would be to hard to get a long distance shot. HE/THEY ARE LISTENING AND PROVING THEY CAN DO ANYTHING PEOPLE SUGGEST.
They may just have found a way to convince their other voters that that is a dangerous policy. The Dems may end up having to choose between immigrants and their homegrown voters.
I remember reading that here on FR. I don't remember hearing that on the radio.
And the perp's wife later admitted the guy had been associated with Gamaa al-Islamiyah, one of the Egyptian extremist groups that have now joined al Qaeda.
I think that's now ruled out by the ballistic match with the earlier sniper shootings. In fact, the fact that, even when he went into a neighborhood with a lot of Moslems, he still ended up killing a non-Moslem victim weighs in the other direction, that we're dealing with jihadis.
Especially if a citizen in CCW Virginia ends up popping the guy.
I don't either. If the tarot card had read "I am Allah", I might have a different take on it, but I just can't see al-Qaida taking affirmative steps to blame someone else for this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.