Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raisin Industry Relief
The California State Grange ^ | 10-14-02 | Walter A. Shubin

Posted on 10/15/2002 12:41:46 AM PDT by farmfriend

A REQUEST FOR AN EMERGENCY DECLARATION OF RELIEF FOR THE RAISIN INDUSTSRY

THE REQUEST
A request is made of the Governor to declare a state of emergency in Fresno County to allow relief for the raisin industry nearing a state of collapse. This request would allow Federal loan and loan guarantee programs and other institutions to roll over financing for repayment in future years, and to initiate additional financing on realistic repayment terms.

WHY THIS IS NEEDED NOW
In the past thirty-six months drastic decreases in domestic and world market prices for raisins are causing one-third of California’s 5,500 raisin growers to have gone out of business or who are in the process of closing down. These farm families who on average grow on forty-five acres were often referred to as the mainstays of their rural communities. Another third do not have the assets to survive more than one additional season, and perhaps within two years the industry will close. Four thousand agricultural workers have lost their jobs; another eight thousand are in jeopardy. Rural communities in Fresno County losing their major industry will suffer devastating losses of local businesses and jobs.

The growers have identified the causes of the market decline, developed a workable plan to cope with these, and now need one to two years to bring stability back to their industry, long noted as among the most stable of all California agricultural products. What they need is protection from creditors and lenders for a short-term period to allow them to work through situation. A declaration of an emergency would permit loan deferments to occur without the lenders or loan guarantee programs facing penalties from regulators.

SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM
More than 5,500 growers produce California’s 272,000 acres of raisin grapes, primarily in Fresno County. A historically stable market, income at the farm gate has ranged from $850,000,000 to $875,000,000 a year providing direct employment to 13,075 full time equivalent workers, and in fact providing the primary support for more than 25,000 industry employees.

During the past three years several converging factors have driven the prices raisin growers receive well below the cost of production. The problem is of a magnitude greater than simply individual farm families losing their assets, but is one of a potentially larger scale regional impact. The growers have identified the causes for this and have a practical program to address these. What they need is time to work out these issues, and protection from loses, their land and assets before they can do so.

There are five categories of loss: land value, annual income loss to growers, jobs, loss to others in the community, reduced tax collections.

Land value
Raisin grape land three years ago was selling for $10,000 to $12,000 an acre; current prices are in the $3,000 - $4,000 and acre range. Reduction in land value averages $7,500 an acre x 272,000 acres or $2,040,000,000 industry-wide. To the average farmer with 45 acres of raisin grapes this is a $337,500 loss of equity, leaving only $135,000 of real estate, often times less than the mortgage on the property. This widespread loss of land values if not promptly addressed has the potential of spilling over to land equity throughout the region.

Annual grower income
Prices paid at the farm gate have declined from a historic $3,500 to $3,650 an acre to less than $1,175 an acre. This is less than half the cost of production, and far less than expenses not including interest, depreciation and amortization. Since the decline in prices occurred three years ago, more than one-third of all grape growers have left the business either voluntarily or involuntarily, and the rate is accelerating as asset reserves dwindle. The annual decline in income to the industry is $2,400 x 272,000 acres or $652,000,000. The reduced gross income per grower exceeds $1,000,000 on average.

Jobs
Four thousand jobs a year are being lost to the industry and without intervention this rate will rapidly increase.

Community losses
Income from raisin grapes primarily stays in the community. The two major types of purchases manufactured out of the region, heavy equipment and chemicals, account for less than 20% of gross income. More than 75% of gross grower income is used within the region. A conservative estimate of the times income re-circulates is based on the percentage of primary income means a re-circulation of 3 times. Thus the loss of income to the community is nearly $2 billion a year. This could eventually impact the region by as many as 20,000 jobs.

Reduced tax collections
The state is losing payroll taxes on thousands of jobs, sales taxes on hundreds of millions of purchases, property taxes on future lower land assessments of several billion dollars, and excise taxes collected by Alcohol Beverage Control amounting to $12,500 for each acre of raisin grapes no longer processed to high proof products such as brandy.


Three years ago several factors converged simultaneously on the California raisin market.

  1. Apple juice from China and Argentina were dumped on the domestic market displacing grape juice as a commercial sweetener. Production from 20,000 California raisin grape acres became surplus.
  2. Recent plantings in Turkey matured and provided lower cost competition in the European market. Production from 15,000 California raisin grape acres became surplus.
  3. Major wineries overestimated the rate of growth in the market, offering rural land owners attractive contracts to plant wine grape varietals. Over planting of wine grape varietals along the California Coast and in Oregon brought an oversupply of more than 25,000 acres to the domestic market displacing the Thompson Raisin variety.
  4. The total surplus from these three issues equal 60,000 acres (150,000 tons) and is the basis for the problems.
  5. The oversight organizations for the raisin industry were slow to react to these severe threats after a long string of years in which supply and demand were in balance. A full growing season and one half of another passed before raisin growers took action to reinvigorate these organizations and develop a program to bring a balance to supply and demand.

THE PROGRAM OF CORRECTIVE ACTION
An effective program of corrective action requires immediate steps to bring production and consumption into line, and longer range solutions to increase demand and establish a system to assure that accurate market forecasts are recognized within the industry, and that action early in a production year can be taken to prevent (or at least minimize) oversupply. These steps include:

For implementation in the short term

For development and implementation over time

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to acknowledge the following information sources: The California Department of Food and Agriculture, the California Employment Development Department, the University of California Cooperative Extension Service, the Raisin Bargaining Association, and the Raisin Administrative Committee.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: agriculture; calgov2002; farm; government
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: PARKFAN
Amen to what you said but I've fought and screamed and written editorials. I've never missed a vote and yet I don't seem to be able to make a difference.
21 posted on 10/15/2002 11:21:21 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
I think Al gore and his ilk would like to have us at the mercy of China or Russia. Could you imagine if we couldn't feed ourselves as a nation? That's just too scary for me to think about but most people don't even care. They think that food grew right there on the grocery shelf and that there's an unlimited supply.
22 posted on 10/15/2002 11:23:52 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
I love raisins. Straight and in cookies, oatmeal, etc!
23 posted on 10/15/2002 11:31:40 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I think bringing them back would be a great idea.

"I heard it through the grape vine, not much longer would you be mine."

24 posted on 10/15/2002 12:50:06 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
bump.
25 posted on 10/15/2002 10:45:06 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tiki; farmfriend
You are right about mr. gore. I believe national security starts with the food supply. Is that not so, farmfriend?
26 posted on 10/15/2002 11:11:06 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
I believe national security starts with the food supply.

All the arguments people use against foreign oil are twice as important when it comes to our food. Just try and tell that to those who believe farmers should just go out of business and be done with it. There are so many of them on the farm bill threads. The farm bill wasn't that great and needs to be done away with some how but not by letting domestic farmers go away.

STOP DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN FOOD

27 posted on 10/16/2002 7:21:14 AM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
I just read an article in California Farmer magazine that said that Spanish companies are farming olives in California. Can they make more of a profit farming here than in Spain? Are foreign companies buying a lot of farmland in California?
28 posted on 10/16/2002 7:40:58 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; Carry_Okie
I don't know. Good question. Maybe Carry_Okie can answer it.
29 posted on 10/16/2002 7:52:45 AM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Foreign companies are buying up lots of American resource assets, and they magically have few problems with regulatory authorities, particularly mining interests.
30 posted on 10/16/2002 7:56:47 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 1380 KTKZ Sacramento
If you are looking for a good issue, here is one.
31 posted on 10/20/2002 12:15:03 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones; Truth29; blackdog
PIng for the farmers
32 posted on 10/21/2002 9:35:18 AM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
prosperity for america is important, but obviously the republicans and the democrats have other priorities.
33 posted on 10/21/2002 9:40:51 AM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
You might be interested in this article.
34 posted on 10/27/2002 10:05:18 PM PST by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PARKFAN
There is no way we can compete!

Um...... so what? Grow something we CAN compete in, or else, get out of farming all together. The higher our nation progresses up the job and products chain, the better of we will be. A good economic mind knows that you use the mose EFFICIENT means of producing. If that means to buy your products from a nation that is more efficient, that is good, cause you can now focus on bigger things.

35 posted on 11/01/2002 8:50:32 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tiki
#35 is for you to :-)
36 posted on 11/01/2002 8:51:20 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
And I know you will especially like my post #35
37 posted on 11/01/2002 8:53:08 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
I guess you missed this line:
This could eventually impact the region by as many as 20,000 jobs.

Using your formula, we should just get our oil from Saudi Arabia or Iraq because they can produce it easier than we can.

38 posted on 11/01/2002 8:56:59 PM PST by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
This could eventually impact the region by as many as 20,000 jobs. OH NO!!! Don't tell me people will have to change careers!!!! Oh how did we ever survive the industrial revolution? As for Saudi Oil, if you took out all the safety issues, YES, we should. But since money we give them seems to go into the pocket of terrorists who wish to harm us, it's probably not a good idea. However, we should absolutely exploit the oil of friendly nations, if it is more economically efficient to do so. Do you think that if you put a wall around your county, that it would be just as well off, economically as it is now? If not, why stop at our borders?
39 posted on 11/01/2002 9:01:21 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
I can't stand raisins eventhough I was born in Selma. I guess it's because I've cut grapes and I consider a raisin to be a rotten grape seasoned with bird s**t. Anyway I really worry about the entire farm economy of the whole San Joe Quinn Valley. I was there once, did that once, and feel for those who still do.
40 posted on 11/01/2002 9:13:06 PM PST by csmusaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson