Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wednesday, 10/9, Market WrapUp (Derivative model breakdown?)
Financial Sense Online ^ | 10/9/2002 | James J. Puplava

Posted on 10/09/2002 5:25:50 PM PDT by rohry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
Today Abbey Joseph Cohen lowered her Dow expectations from 11,300 to 10,800. What world do these people live in?
1 posted on 10/09/2002 5:25:50 PM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD


2 posted on 10/09/2002 5:26:50 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; bvw; Tauzero; robnoel; kezekiel; ChadGore; Harley - Mississippi; Dukie; Matchett-PI; ...
Market WrapUp is delivered...

...and IBM hits $55, 5 more points and my $50 prediction happens. Did everyone get out at $100+ when I made my $60 prediction? Hope so...
3 posted on 10/09/2002 5:29:11 PM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Today Abbey Joseph Cohen lowered her Dow expectations from 11,300 to 10,800. What world do these people live in?

So what this guy is saying basically is that we're cooked! Stick a knife in us cause we're done. Nothing can save us so the last one out turn off the lights. We can't recover--- EVER?!! Everyone will lose EVERYTHING! Does that about cover it?

4 posted on 10/09/2002 5:34:45 PM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teletech
Don't Jump!
5 posted on 10/09/2002 5:36:27 PM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rohry
I did find one bright spot for some lucky investors. Maybe Martha Stewart got in on this one.

The Boston Celtics (BOS) were hot and the National Basketball Association season hasn't even started. Shares of the storied basketball franchise shot up 147 percent, closing up $16.65 at $28. Details of a buyout offer for the team were unveiled last week.

6 posted on 10/09/2002 5:38:19 PM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rohry
someone please tell me how it is that precious metals (gold) are still flat.
7 posted on 10/09/2002 5:41:59 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teletech
The short version is that we are still suffering the aftereffects of a bubble market. The repercussions of the bubble will take years, if not decades to sort out. The reason more "experts" aren't talking about this fact is because the business schools and economics courses don't talk much about previous bubble markets, so they don't have much knowlege of what leads to them or what happens afterwards.

To be perfectly honest, I'm figuring that we are in for about a 10-15 year bear market. Sorry if this is a depressing concept, but I believe this is the truth. The Dow will probably end up around 3000 before this is all said and done. In fact, I'll pick some numbers right now.

Dow 3000, NASDAQ 750, S&P500 500. Within the next two years. This is, of course, predicted with my patented SWAG ("Scientific" Wild Assed Guess) method. Personally, I'm in cash and real estate right now. Stocks and bonds make me nervous.
8 posted on 10/09/2002 5:45:01 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
I'd like to know the answer to that as well!
9 posted on 10/09/2002 5:45:44 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rohry
On the bright side, at least we'll all be dead in a few decades or so.
10 posted on 10/09/2002 5:46:53 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
"Don't Jump!"

I'm laughing like a fool. Thanks for the humor...
11 posted on 10/09/2002 5:50:52 PM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Reuters Market News

US CREDIT OUTLOOK - Almost no place to hide

Wednesday October 9, 4:58 pm ET

By Eric Burroughs

NEW YORK, Oct 9 (Reuters) - Each day seems to bear more grim news for high-strung U.S. capital markets and provide U.S. Treasuries yet more reason to hit new historic low yields.

As stocks keep hitting five-year lows and mounting worries about credit quality have pummeled widely held names like Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F - News) and J.P. Morgan Chase (NYSE:JPM - News), investors are seeking shelter in only the safest of capital hide-outs.

Thus benchmark Treasury yields keep plunging to levels not seen since the 1950s and two-year note yields hit record lows, and analysts see nothing to stop the trend on the horizon.

Spreads on corporate bonds, agency debt, mortgage-backed securities and emerging market debt all widened against Treasuries on Wednesday -- and with good reason.

The Dow fell 215 points on an analyst warning about General Electric's (NYSE:GE - News) future performance. Ford's bonds were hit hard. Moody's downgraded J.P. Morgan Chase's credit rating, while the rating of Germany's Allianz Group was also knocked down by both Moody's and Standard & Poor's. Junk bond yields soared to record highs near 11 percentage points over Treasuries.

more: http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/021009/markets_bonds_outlook_1.html

12 posted on 10/09/2002 5:52:26 PM PDT by Davea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Reuters Business Report

J.P. Morgan Cut by Moody's, Affects Debt

Wednesday October 9, 4:56 pm ET

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Moody's Investors Service on Wednesday cut J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.'s (NYSE:JPM - News) long-term debt ratings, reflecting concern about the No. 2 U.S. bank's near-term ability to maintain "acceptable profitability" as investment banking revenue falls and loan losses mount.

The downgrade, affecting about $42 billion of debt, follows a similar downgrade on Sept. 17 by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services. J.P. Morgan shares fell nearly 7 percent on Wednesday, suffering most of that decline after Moody's early afternoon downgrade.

Moody's cut J.P. Morgan's senior unsecured debt one notch to "A1," its fifth highest grade, from "Aa3," and also cut several other ratings. Its rating outlook is now stable.

MORE: http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/021009/financial_jpmorgan_moodys_7.html ==============================================================

13 posted on 10/09/2002 5:53:53 PM PDT by Davea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teletech
*Everyone will lose EVERYTHING!

He does give a way out.

"The metals markets are a lot like a volcano. You never know when they are going to erupt. But when they do, it will be similar to the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. Gold and silver are commodities that are in short supply, with growing investment demand, and limited options for investment. When they take off, their rise will be parabolic -- not gradual."
14 posted on 10/09/2002 5:58:04 PM PDT by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rohry
The formulaic derivatives niche was disproved as flawed over a decade ago, but the analysts and especially the brokerage firms don't want you to know that...
15 posted on 10/09/2002 6:00:43 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: rohry
Reuters Business Report

Ferguson: Fed Can't Fix Stocks Swings

Wednesday October 9, 8:49 pm ET

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve is limited in what it can do to help smooth economic ups and downs, the U.S. central bank's vice chairman said on Wednesday as analysts fretted about the strength of the recovery and stocks tumbled to fresh multiyear lows.

In remarks prepared for delivery to the Bond Market Association, Fed Vice Chairman Roger Ferguson also stressed that the central bank cannot target stock prices, even though some analysts have suggested it should take on more of a role in managing swings in the markets.

"Nobody would deny that central banks can be quite powerful and that monetary policy works, over time," Ferguson said. "But in the scheme of things, a central bank's ability to smooth asset prices (if it wanted to) or to buffer shocks to spending or production is somewhat limited."

He added that "monetary policy action cannot appropriately be targeted to benefit one industry, region or economic group."

Ferguson's discussion of "Central Banks and Markets" came as major U.S. stock indexes tumbled to new multi-year lows in the aftermath of a huge run-up during the late 1990s.

The blue-chip Dow Jones industrial average sank 2.87 percent to 7,286.27 on Wednesday, a low not seen since October 1997. The index is down more than 37 percent from its January 2000 high. The broad Standard & Poor's 500 Index fell 2.73 percent while the Nasdaq Composite slipped or 1.34 percent to hit a new six-year closing low.

Some economists have criticized the Fed for not doing more to try to burst the late 1990s stock market bubble before it got out of hand. Such critics have said higher interest rates might have helped to contain what Greenspan once referred to as "irrational exuberance" in the markets and, thus, possibly have prevented the ensuing hangover.

But Ferguson said the Fed focuses squarely on the macroeconomy and the broad level of prices of goods and services, aiming to avoid either excessive rises or broad declines in prices.

"Some have suggested that under some circumstances central banks should adjust the overnight funds rate to affect intentionally the relative price of another asset class, namely equities," he said, acknowledging the criticism.

"UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES"

But he cited two drawbacks to trying to make stock prices the focus of interest-rate actions: the fact that there is no clear link between rate changes and stock movements and also that there could be "unintended consequences" for the economy from efforts to influence equity markets.

Ferguson did stress that stock market movements factor into Fed decisions, even if they are not the target of policy.

"To be clear, this is not an argument for never considering prices in asset markets when determining how well we are likely to do in achieving our goals," he said.

Just as the Fed's powers are limited concerning stock movements, it cannot always fully counter surprise events or "shocks" that might hit the economy. Ferguson cited the recent sharp pullback in business investment spending as an example.

"The reality is that when the shortfall in desired spending is large or arises quite quickly, as was the case last year when businesses slashed their investment plans in light of a perceived overhang of capital, the initial monetary policy offset can be only partial and not necessarily synchronous," the Fed vice chairman said.

The U.S. central bank last year slashed interest rates 11 times to a 40-year low of 1.75 percent as it sought to fight a recession triggered largely by the business spending pullback.

Although a recovery appears to be under way, it has been choppy and slow to hit its stride.

Ferguson did not discuss the current economic outlook, nor did he delve into the issues of recent Fed policy discussions. At the central bank's last meeting on Sept. 24, the majority of Fed policymakers decided to leave interest rates steady.

But two officials dissented, arguing for cuts in rates.

Without specifically mentioning the two recent dissents, Ferguson said he has been "pleased" with the Fed's decision, announced in March, to disclose to the public any dissents at monetary policy meetings at the time that they occur.

Previously, such dissents were disclosed with a time lag of several weeks. That lag sometimes led to confusion about the context in which dissents were made.

"We decided to eliminate that potential source of misunderstanding, and, for a central bank, we made that decision relatively quickly," he said. "I am pleased with the Committee's quick response."

17 posted on 10/09/2002 6:03:39 PM PDT by Davea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Lazamataz
"On the bright side, at least we'll all be dead in a few decades or so."

Maybe you should reconsider that statement.

We just may not be posting bodily to this board...
19 posted on 10/09/2002 6:04:57 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
The short version is that we are still suffering the aftereffects of a bubble market. The repercussions of the bubble will take years, if not decades to sort out. The reason more "experts" aren't talking about this fact is because the business schools and economics courses don't talk much about previous bubble markets, so they don't have much knowlege of what leads to them or what happens afterwards.

To be perfectly honest, I'm figuring that we are in for about a 10-15 year bear market. Sorry if this is a depressing concept, but I believe this is the truth. The Dow will probably end up around 3000 before this is all said and done. In fact, I'll pick some numbers right now.

Dow 3000, NASDAQ 750, S&P500 500. Within the next two years. This is, of course, predicted with my patented SWAG ("Scientific" Wild Assed Guess) method. Personally, I'm in cash and real estate right now. Stocks and bonds make me nervous.

Well, if we are in a 10-15 year bear market at least my kids will live long enough to see the market recover.

20 posted on 10/09/2002 6:05:39 PM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson