Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TechJunkYard
Most of those systems seem to be going APCO25 or their users switching to Nextel 'phones' ...

My original experience with digital was in the way of a Motorola digital flip - and it was a good experience - to the point I did not *want* to go back to analog ... (I was with a cellular carrier as we rolled out the initial digital service in this area).

The later Nokias weren't as pleasant - a good form-fitting phonce like a full size flip-phone makes a *big* difference. I don't like these candy-bar sized phones at all ...

As to 2-way going to 12.5 kHz channels - most VHF and UHF 2-way use by Mom and Pop user or business users around here us IDEN/Mextel. Makes a LOT more sense and provides greater coverage through a metropolitan area than a 100' tower and 100 watts on a VHF business band frequency in the 152 MHz area ...

(You're talking to a licensed ham and an FCC first-class license holder since '75 ...)

29 posted on 10/07/2002 8:21:16 PM PDT by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: _Jim
Glad to meet ya. Licensed ham since '91. FCC first class 'phone and radar endorsement since '77.

Still a lot of the older analog 800 MHz. trunks around here. And the state highway patrol still loves their low-band VHF towers. And as the munis move to 800, their old 400 repeaters are being adopted for other purposes. NBFM will be with us for a while.

But if you can't afford the equipment and license fees, Nextel is probably the way to go -- especially if you want to get away from the scanner listeners.

31 posted on 10/07/2002 8:35:09 PM PDT by TechJunkYard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson