New Guidelines Open U.S. Data To Challenge

Washington Post ^ | Tuesday, October 1, 2002 | Washington Post Staff Writer

[anymouse]

Knowledge may be power in most places, but cold, hard data rule in Washington.

In the arduous process of creating a federal regulation, the bricks and mortar are the data underlying the rule -- the scientific studies, the surveys, the risk assessments, morbidity estimates, the economic analysis. Regulators at federal agencies are the final arbiters in what goes into the mix and whether it's reliable. Challenges to their judgment usually end up in court years after the rule is conceived.

[anymouse]

Sounds like a good opportunity to debunk liberal pseudo-science and socialist policies.

[Anti-Bubba182]

TAKE BACK THE SENATE!

VOTE OUT THE DEMS!

DONATE TODAY!!!. SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

[justsomedude]

Sounds like a good opportunity to debunk liberal pseudo-science and socialist policies.

Are you kidding? Who knows how to make statistics lie like a liberal?

[anymouse]

Ping

[anymouse]

The point is that now we can challenge the liberals "statics" before they become defacto law.

[Uncle Miltie]

So if Canada Lynx samples taken from penned and stuffed animals were to form the basis of further takings, what can we say about the Northern Spotted Owl?

BTW - Did you know that the Northern Spotted Owl was made endangered, while its genetic twin the Southern Spotted Owl is doing just fine? The eco-wackos had to make a distinction to shut down logging.