Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lautenberg Retracts Promise for 21 Debates
NewsMax.com ^ | 10/06/02 | Carl Limbacher and Crew

Posted on 10/06/2002 12:20:31 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

Sunday Oct. 6, 2002; 2:09 p.m. EDT

Lautenberg Retracts Promise for 21 Debates

A spokesman for Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Frank Lautenberg has retracted Lautenberg's promise, offered just yesterday, that he would meet his Republican opponent Doug Forrester for 21 debates in different New Jersey counties before Election Day.

Asked whether his boss intended to honor the 21-debate pledge, Lautenberg spokesman Tom Shea told WABC Radio's Steve Malzberg, "Absolutely not."

"We'll do debates," Shea explained. "The voters of the state will have plenty of opportunities to hear the two candidates. Twenty-one debates in 21 counties with only 30 days left in the race is a little impractical."

But on Saturday, during an impromptu encounter between the two candidates in Oldbridge, N.J., Lautenberg seemed to unequivocally agree to the 21 debate schedule.

"If you go on the ballot I'd like to challenge you to 21 debates in 21 counties," Forrester told Lautenberg, as the two stood only inches from each other with reporters looking on.

While Lautenberg refused to respond directly to the Republican's invitation, NBC News reporter Arnold Diaz, who witnessed the exchange, asked the 78-year old ex-Senator seconds later, "Mr. Lautenberg, are you going to do the debates if you're the candidate?"

"Of course," Lautenberg responded without hesitation, in comments captured on videotape and broadcast nationally on "Fox News Sunday."

Reacting to Lautenberg's debate flip-flop, Forrester told Malzberg, "I'm very unhappy to hear that they're back-peddling so fast."

The Republican complained that Lautenberg had already nixed an invitation to appear with him earlier on "Fox News Sunday," saying, "It was going to be our first joint appearance and lo and behold he doesn't show up."

Listen to WABC Radio's Steve Malzberg on "The Buzz" with Richard Bey, 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. ET weekdays, and on solo Sunday, 9 a.m. to 12 noon.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

DNC

Editor's note:
FREE - 4 Months to NewsMax.com`s Magazine. Check It Out - Get four FREE



TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: forrester; hellohelied; lautenberg; newjersey; senile; senility; torch; torricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2002 12:20:31 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

KEEP AMERICA FREE

DONATE TODAY
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 10/06/2002 12:23:45 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
NBC News reporter Arnold Diaz, who witnessed the exchange, asked the 78-year old ex-Senator seconds later, "Mr. Lautenberg, are you going to do the debates if you're the candidate?" "Of course," Lautenberg responded without hesitation,

LOL, isn't Alzheimer's a bitch?

3 posted on 10/06/2002 12:28:48 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"LOL, isn't Alzheimer's a bitch?"

Yes - but also lying comes easy to them. He's on the way right out of the box - LIARBERG!!!

4 posted on 10/06/2002 12:31:23 PM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
NBC News reporter Arnold Diaz, who witnessed the exchange, asked the 78-year old ex-Senator seconds later, "Mr. Lautenberg, are you going to do the debates if you're the candidate?"

"Of course," Lautenberg responded without hesitation, in comments captured on videotape and broadcast nationally on "Fox News Sunday."

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!...another lying scumbag.

FMCDH

5 posted on 10/06/2002 12:31:36 PM PDT by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Lautenberg's not going to be able to handle ONE debate. It's quite amusing that for all the RATS' lying for eight years about Reagan being a senile old coot, it's one of their own guys that's going to turn out to be the real deal.

"Who am I? Why am I here?"

6 posted on 10/06/2002 12:31:41 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Remember that memorable line: I'm out of ammo!!

Think Loutenberg is in the same category.

7 posted on 10/06/2002 12:40:45 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
The rats are going to be so desperate to hide Lautenberg's dementia, I won't be surprised if we see less of him in the next few weeks than we saw of Patsy Mink in the weeks after she died and morphed into a carrot on life support.
8 posted on 10/06/2002 12:44:45 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
At his age and he still can't count to 21
9 posted on 10/06/2002 12:47:57 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
If and when they ever debate, we need a live thread going on FR to critique how both do. It will also be interested to see how long it takes for Laughtenberg to finally debate Forrester, or if they will put in a switch hitter...
10 posted on 10/06/2002 12:53:28 PM PDT by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Lautenburg is 78 years old and he is a REAL old 78. The night he was selected as Torricelli's replacement he made a pathetic speech in which he could barely drool. Now that he's ahead in the polls (courtesy of a compliant media), the Demos have no desire to expose his senility in a debate.
11 posted on 10/06/2002 1:01:58 PM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The rats are going to be so desperate to hide Lautenberg's dementia,

I don't know about dementia, but the dims want to get to Nov 5 with as little personal campaigning by Lautenberg as possible. They lead in the polls, by vitue of having piked up a large majority of dimo voters who were turned off to Toricelli. If Lautenberg goes out and flubs badly during personal appearances, these voters could turn off again. Best for the dims to blanket the airwaves with a barrage of anti-Forrester ads and hope their lead holds through Nov 5. For Forrester, he has no choice but to both sell his agenda and attack Lautenberg, in a 30-70 ratio, with an emphasis on biuilding Lautenberg's negatives. Slamming Lautenberg in whatever debates the opposition permits wouild be VERY helpful.

12 posted on 10/06/2002 1:02:17 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Of course he is senile.
13 posted on 10/06/2002 1:43:42 PM PDT by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Forrester's campaign should warn voters that the Demos are proposing that they elect a vegetable to represent them in the U.S. Senate.
14 posted on 10/06/2002 1:45:27 PM PDT by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The lies begin. Yawn!
15 posted on 10/06/2002 3:38:37 PM PDT by LaGrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Twenty-one debates in 21 counties with only 30 days left in the race is a little impractical

But reprinting every ballot and resending absentee ballots and re-voting by those that have already cast ballots is practical.

---

Flyer

16 posted on 10/06/2002 3:42:36 PM PDT by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I won't be surprised if we see less of him

Forrester should have an empty podium next to him at every appearance to represent Lautenberg's absence.

17 posted on 10/06/2002 3:48:20 PM PDT by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
Forrester should have an empty podium next to him at every appearance to represent Lautenberg's absence.

I don't know, the empty podium might make more sense than loutenberg (sic)

18 posted on 10/06/2002 3:54:01 PM PDT by woofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: woofer
the empty podium might make more sense

Yeah, then they would have to put it on the ballot. Nevermind.

19 posted on 10/06/2002 3:57:56 PM PDT by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Aw, lay off the old guy. Dontcha know Frank missed taking his nap that day?

Poor senile old dear musta been zonked out on No-Doze pills.

It's disgraceful to hold good ol' Frank responsible for having a forgetful senior moment.

20 posted on 10/06/2002 4:38:08 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson