Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada: Poor Boy of NATO
Radio Netherlands ^ | October 42002 | Dan Karpenchuk

Posted on 10/04/2002 1:30:30 PM PDT by knighthawk

Canada has welcomed the recent US proposal to create a NATO rapid reaction force, but critics claim the nation's shrinking defence budget will simply not stretch far enough to contribute.

The NATO strike force concept was unveiled by the US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld at last month's meeting of NATO defence ministers in Warsaw. He proposed a body of 20,000 troops on call for quick deployment anywhere in the world.

In Canada's case, many believe that after years of defence spending cuts, the nation has little left to offer such a force.

At September's meeting of NATO ministers in Warsaw, Canadian Defence Minister, John McCallum, praised the idea of a rapid reaction force.

Mr McCallum said it was positive because it provides a multilateral force in the post September 11 world, which can respond to any number of threats or problems. But Mr McCallum was vague about Canada's commitment, saying only that it would take part.

"We will obviously have some commitment to that force. We don't know yet exactly what that will consist of."

Vague for a Reason

There could be good reason behind that vagueness. Critics in the Canadian parliament say Canada no longer has the ability to offer any meaningful commitment. Military spending was slashed during the early 90s at a time when governments were desperate to reduce the deficit, and recruitment in the military fell. Canada's aging war machinery is now in need of upgrading; some of the weapons on its coastal patrol vessels are of World War II vintage.

Retired Colonel Alain Pelerin, the executive director of the Conference of Defence Associations, says Canada is suffering from defence cuts even more than other NATO members:

"The problem with NATO, and that includes Canada, is that they've sat too long, too many years since the Cold War, on the so-called peace dividend and haven't invested in defence. Canada for instance in the last ten years has gone from [spending] two per cent of the GDP [on defence] to about one per cent and that's the same for most NATO nations except maybe for the UK. There is a recent trend where Germany, France, and the UK have indicated that they're ready to put substantial amounts into defence. Hopefully Canada will follow suit, because we've really fallen behind."

Scrapped Planes

Over the past couple of years, the criticisms of Canadian military readiness have become more strident. Late last year the Air Force announced plans to scrap a third of its fighter-bombers, and reduce all military flights to save money. The Navy also tied up one of its destroyers for lack of a crew.

Col Pelerin says Canada would be hard pressed to make the same kind of commitment to the proposed NATO reaction force as it did to the US mission in Afghanistan.

One of the biggest problems is the ability to transport, by plane, large numbers of troops, equipment, and supplies. In addition, Canada already supports several peacekeeping missions throughout the world including Cyprus, and the Balkans.

Leon Benoit, defence critic for the opposition Canadian Alliance party, doesn't believe Canada has the ability to take part in the proposed rapid reaction force at all:

"The reality is that if we commit hundreds of troops who are specifically dedicated to this, that we're going to back off somewhere else, we're going to have to buy them new equipment and we're going to have to buy strategic airlift."

US Criticism

The criticisms of Canada's military might are also coming from south of the border. US ambassador, Paul Celucci, says unless Canada increases spending it will be difficult for it to take part in future international military operations, and it risks losing its voice in military matters. The ambassador makes it clear that the Bush administration wants Ottawa's contribution to increase:

"Despite the huge military capability of the United States, we cannot do it alone. That's the point we're making. We need allies and we need our allies to put the resources in as well."

Senior officers in Canada have been calling for a huge injection of cash into the defence budget recently; but that call that has already gone unheeded for several years.


TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; donaldrumsfeld; johnmccallum; military; nato; strikeforce
The unilateral disarming of Canada
1 posted on 10/04/2002 1:30:31 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 10/04/2002 1:31:08 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

TAKE BACK THE SENATE!

VOTE OUT THE DEMS!

DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD


3 posted on 10/04/2002 1:32:09 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
The bright side to this story is that about ten of us here could get together and conquer Canada in an afternoon.
4 posted on 10/04/2002 1:34:41 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The bright side to this story is that about ten of us here could get together and conquer Canada in an afternoon.

Sad but true. Amazing where socialists put their priorities. Their medical system is a joke as well as their military preparedness. C'est la vie....

5 posted on 10/04/2002 1:44:04 PM PDT by BulletBrasDotNet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BulletBrasDotNet
Good, I'll count you in. Now we need to round up eight more Freepers.
6 posted on 10/04/2002 1:45:31 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
If a majority of the Canadian people wish to shoulder their fair share of their own protection, they will vote in a new government. If they love the socialism and its holier than thou attitude towards the US, then they will maintain their current government.
7 posted on 10/04/2002 1:48:56 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
No, I think that Canada could take Belgium.
8 posted on 10/04/2002 1:51:17 PM PDT by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Anyone could take Belgium. That does not count.
9 posted on 10/04/2002 1:56:06 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I am little more concerned that an alleged Conservative is talking about a transnational army. Looks like Wolfowitz is calling all the shots now.
10 posted on 10/04/2002 1:59:25 PM PDT by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: knighthawk
The Navy also tied up one of its destroyers for lack of a crew.

So they have one left?

Anyone could take Belgium. That does not count.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

13 posted on 10/04/2002 2:52:40 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
You're on your own. We've seen how those Canadian snipers can shoot.
14 posted on 10/04/2002 3:00:03 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid; Dog Gone
Well, yes. But those were the last bullets of the Canadian army left in the inventory.
15 posted on 10/04/2002 3:02:43 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Yes, but it got tied up because Chrétien thinks his yellow rubber duckie he bathes with is defense enough to deter anyone!

(We Dutch always joke about Belgians, it's in our blood)
16 posted on 10/04/2002 3:08:10 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
If a majority of the Canadian people wish to shoulder their fair share of their own protection, they will vote in a new government. If they love the socialism and its holier than thou attitude towards the US, then they will maintain their current government.

No they won't. They will milk Canada to the last drop. Then the bloodsuckers will move south. That's the way Socialists work. Like lawyers, they wail for justice while robbing the earnings of the productive.

17 posted on 10/04/2002 3:27:58 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
LOL!
18 posted on 10/04/2002 3:38:30 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
A dutchman making fun of the Canadian military. Imagine that.

What's next, dutchmen poking fun at the Belgians and French for surrendering to the Germans?

Very amusing.

19 posted on 10/04/2002 5:42:04 PM PDT by Black Powder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson