Replies

"See post #576 for your answer"

Thanks, but since I've done homicide prosecutions in this area, I don't need to read more of your analysis on the criminal law. I'm just happy you posted again. I thought for a moment you had given up your point, which is causing my delight and guffawing here as me and my boyfriend read your points. Please, I do insist: keep trying to persuade me. Don't know WHEN I've had this much fun.

FBI: Maryland shootings fit no category Agency profilers can see no motive other than terrorism

What part of that statement do you not understand? That is the title of an article posted here at FR, but of course you couldn't be bothered to click and read, you're too busy being condescending and facetious.

FRIDAY OCTOBER 4 2002

FBI: Maryland shootings fit no category Agency profilers can see no motive other than terrorism

Posted: October 4, 2002 3:10 p.m. Eastern

WASHINGTON – It's not gang-banging. Or spree-shooting. Or armed robbery. And it's not a serial killer.

So what would motivate two assailants to randomly target five victims in a Maryland suburb, and possibly a sixth in D.C., killing each with a single shot from a high-powered rifle?

Click the link for the whole article. NUFF SAID!

Thanks, but since I've done homicide prosecutions in this area, I don't need to read more of your analysis on the criminal law. I'm just happy you posted again. I thought for a moment you had given up your point, which is causing my delight and guffawing here as me and my boyfriend read your points. Please, I do insist: keep trying to persuade me. Don't know WHEN I've had this much fun.

Be careful, mam, as your maturity(?) is showing.