Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daschle’s Corporate Scandal - Where not even Bill Clinton would go.
National Review ^ | 10/4/02 | Peter Ferrara

Posted on 10/04/2002 10:14:54 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

enate Majority Leader Tom Daschle has led the attack in trying to tie Republicans to the corporate scandals at Enron, WorldCom, and elsewhere. He has harshly criticized U.S. companies that set up offshore shells in island tax havens like Bermuda to avoid U.S. taxes.

But Daschle himself is now promoting just what he has criticized in quietly pushing a corporate-welfare scam that was too dirty even for Bill Clinton.

The proposal would permanently exempt from taxation 90 percent of the profits earned by the subsidiaries of U.S. firms in Puerto Rico. The proposal would even allow U.S. companies to "borrow" the profits of Puerto Rican subsidiaries free of interest or taxes for as long as they want. This would leave the profits from Puerto Rican subsidiaries completely free of tax.

If enacted, Daschle's plan would cost the federal treasury $4.6 billion in lost revenue next year, $18.3 billion over the first five years, and $32.1 billion over ten years.

The proposal would effectively bring back one of the most notorious corporate-welfare rip-offs in U.S. history. Now being phased out, it is referred to as Section 956, which is the Internal Revenue Code Section embodying it. The provision was originally adopted in 1976 and exempted U.S. Puerto Rican subsidiaries from taxation, expanding earlier preferential tax subsidies going back decades.

The problem is that these tax preferences have cost U.S. taxpayers a fortune, but have done little to benefit the people of Puerto Rico. Studies showed the preferences cost taxpayers about ten-percent more in lost revenue than the wages paid to employees of the Puerto Rican subsidiaries. In other words, American taxpayers were effectively paying the wages of the workers of the Puerto Rican subsidiaries, and losing an additional ten percent to boot.

Moreover, a 1992 GAO study examined the high-profile pharmaceutical companies who received two thirds of the benefits of these tax preferences over the years. The study concluded that the revenue lost to these subsidiaries was almost three times as much as the wages paid to the workers.

The end was near when Puerto Rican subsidiaries were found costing U.S. taxpayers $330,000 for each worker hired, over ten times the average wage paid to those workers.

The drug companies insist that tax benefits like Section 956 are essential to their continued presence in Puerto Rico, and the island's economy would collapse without them. But those companies employ only two percent of the Puerto Rican workforce. Moreover, most of these will not leave even without the tax preferences, because they are too well-established there now and moving and losing all of their current workforce would be too costly.

Indeed, despite the tax preferences, the Puerto Rican economy stagnated in the late 1970s, with growth rates below two percent year after year. In the early 1980s, unemployment reached 22 percent, before stabilizing at around 15 percent, about double the U.S. rate, through the early 1990s.

The tax preferences were so ineffective because U.S. corporations ended up moving capital to Puerto Rico to take advantage of the loophole. But Puerto Rico is not a low-wage location. Since it is a U.S. territory, the federal minimum wage applies there.

So the Puerto Rican subsidiaries minimized their hiring of local workers. They often contracted out any labor intensive work to the low wage workers of the nearby Dominican Republic. This practice ultimately supported a Dominican workforce of 250,000 laborers, about 2.5 times the number of Puerto Rican workers hired due to the tax preferences.

All of this was too much even for Bill Clinton. He proposed eliminating the tax preferences in 1993, and won congressional approval to scale them back substantially. In 1996, he led Congress to adopt a complete phase-out over ten years.

But Daschle would bring this scandalous corporate-welfare boondoggle back to life, even though he supported and voted for Clinton's proposals in the 1990s. Newspapers in Puerto Rico are reporting that Daschle has promised the pro-tax scam lobbyists that he will attach his outrageous proposal very quietly to some bill going through the Senate.

Why would Daschle want to do this? Well, the big corporate fat cats benefiting from these tax breaks are notorious for spreading big campaign contributions around to those who will support their cause. And Daschle needs big bucks to preserve his razor-thin Senate majority.

Indeed, the public records show that the pharmaceuticals alone have given almost a million dollars to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in this election cycle.

Enron and WorldCom were small potatoes compared to this.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corporatescandals; daschle; daschlesrecord; republicans

1 posted on 10/04/2002 10:14:54 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
WIPE THE SMILE OFF OF THIS MAN’S FACE.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate here by secure server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

2 posted on 10/04/2002 10:15:16 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This must be publicized. Bush should mention this whenever the lib media presses him about Enron/Corp. corruption.
3 posted on 10/04/2002 10:38:45 AM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
No, Bush should avoid getting down in the gutter with scum like Daschle. Let someone else push this.
4 posted on 10/04/2002 10:53:38 AM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Like the media?
5 posted on 10/04/2002 6:48:20 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
BUMP...
6 posted on 10/04/2002 7:07:35 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
DascHOLE, the cancerous cankor sore of America.

Soon, the good citizens of SD will excise him from the body politic.

7 posted on 10/04/2002 7:48:18 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson