Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida Supreme Court Challenges New Jersey Supreme Court to Round of Golf.
Northeast News | 10/04/2002 | Northeast

Posted on 10/04/2002 5:55:01 AM PDT by Northeast

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Fore!
1 posted on 10/04/2002 5:55:02 AM PDT by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Northeast
We don't need no stinkin' rules....
2 posted on 10/04/2002 5:56:44 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Northeast
25 holes so you can excuse 7 holes pars don't count for anything the team with the most votes wins regardless of score
3 posted on 10/04/2002 5:56:55 AM PDT by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Northeast
Chief Justice Poritz:

"I think we should interpret Par 3 holes liberally. We must weigh the need for administrative niceties such as scorecards against the players' need to get par. The clear intent of the rule is that this hole should be considered slightly more inclusive than the others. So what do you think? Can a 7 be a par on this hole? Is it doable? Help me craft a remedy!"

4 posted on 10/04/2002 5:59:10 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
heh. Yeah, but we need to get the word "choice" in there somewhere.

Regards

5 posted on 10/04/2002 6:02:07 AM PDT by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Northeast
May all 14 of them be given their pink slips at the ninth hole.
6 posted on 10/04/2002 6:03:36 AM PDT by RepubMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
Hmm, maybe 12 holes and then we can extrapolate the intent of the course designer in tallying the final score.

Regards

7 posted on 10/04/2002 6:04:15 AM PDT by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McLynnan
Perhaps your DH would like to view this match?
8 posted on 10/04/2002 6:04:37 AM PDT by RepubMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RepubMommy
I wouldn't be surprised if some of the male justices secretly wear pink slips.

Regards

9 posted on 10/04/2002 6:05:50 AM PDT by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
We need to make sure steenkin rules are clear, se we can ignore them, silly

Regards

10 posted on 10/04/2002 6:07:35 AM PDT by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Northeast
I wouldn't be surprised if some of the male justices secretly wear pink slips.

I'd like to give all the justices pink slips.

11 posted on 10/04/2002 6:10:43 AM PDT by vollmond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Northeast
HOWDY PARTNER!
THERE'S ONLY 32 DAYS UNTIL THE ELECTION.

PLEASE HELP ME TAKE BACK THE SENATE!

TakeBackCongress.org

A resource for conservatives who want a Republican Senate

12 posted on 10/04/2002 6:47:35 AM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Northeast
What is the record for the most mulligans in a round? It will be broken if this bunch plays.
13 posted on 10/04/2002 6:56:32 AM PDT by shortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD



14 posted on 10/04/2002 7:00:20 AM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Northeast
Bump!
15 posted on 10/04/2002 7:41:01 AM PDT by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RepubMommy
Perhaps your DH would like to view this match?

Yes, but undercover with a videocam so he can document all the creative counting.

16 posted on 10/04/2002 9:17:16 AM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Huck
What if someone hits the pin? Should that count as in the hole?
17 posted on 10/04/2002 9:48:17 AM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: byteback
Hey, you'll have to ask the great legal minds of NJ about that one. It's too technical for me. I don't even know what I'm supposed to be counterbalancing in that question.
18 posted on 10/04/2002 10:05:50 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: byteback
Lemme check the rulebook.

Ah, here we go.

"If it hits da pin,
It mus' go in!"

Hmm. Sounds like its open to interpretation to me.

Regards

19 posted on 10/04/2002 12:24:36 PM PDT by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Northeast
Bump! LOL!
20 posted on 10/04/2002 2:11:12 PM PDT by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson