To: nyc.flip.conservative
I don't thinkthe republicans SHOUlD fight this. That turns this into a national bush/gore reprise and galvanizes the dems to get out & vote. just let the dem there lose.
To: Thornwell Simons
I don't thinkthe republicans SHOUlD fight this. That turns this into a national bush/gore reprise and galvanizes the dems to get out & vote. just let the dem there lose. Yes, lets just roll over and die. Let's just let the Dems pull whatever dirty trick they like. Let's not fight evil and corruption, it might make us look bad...............
To: Thornwell Simons
The problem with NOT fighting this is the re-occurance of the scenario. This is a FEDERAL election and I don't know which laws apply Ballots HAVE already gone out and the state is violating the law by holding back any further mailings of the military ballots.
If some ballots have already been returned (as someone said), that would mean you could vote twice??? Had no ballots gone out and it was within the 50 days,I might look at this differently but the fact remains that a write in WAS ALWAYS POSSIBLE so the voters were not prohibited in any way.
I believe the replacement of Torricelli with Lauterbach will be deemed illegal. As usual, the Dems keep up their "Cheat & Beat" methods.
Wonder how much Lauterbach got paid for this run.
Follow the money and I bet it will lead back to both "Clintons", the cigar promoter AND the "carpetbagger".
Sac
To: Thornwell Simons
The reason for fighting this is that it goes to the heart of free fair elections. The Democrats in New Jersey are using the elections playbook of Robert Mugabe, Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin. If perchance Forester wins I can see them going into court now demanding a new election becuase Frank did not get enough time to campaign.
8 posted on
10/03/2002 5:33:33 AM PDT by
harpseal
To: Thornwell Simons
Isee your point from the standpoint of political tactics, but there is a larger, more important issue involved: the rule of law.
Someone has to stand up and say "enough" when laws are clearly ignored.
When I was in law school, we were taught that "shall" means "shall," as in MANDATORY. Kinda like "is" means "is."
To: Thornwell Simons
I don't thinkthe republicans SHOUlD fight this. That turns this into a national bush/gore reprise and galvanizes the dems to get out & vote. just let the dem there lose. Strap on your chains pal
To: Thornwell Simons
I don't thinkthe republicans SHOUlD fight this. That turns this into a national bush/gore reprise and galvanizes the dems to get out & vote. just let the dem there lose. With "thinkers" like you, Gore would be president.
18 posted on
10/03/2002 8:18:55 AM PDT by
cinFLA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson