Forrester Statement On New Jersey Supreme Court Decision

Forrester 2002 | 10/2/2002 | Forrester 2002

[Rokke]

"This is not ruling on a President, but a Senate race. It does not have near as big a national impact."

As evidence of that, the ruling today barely made it onto network news. I only saw it mentioned on NBC about halfway through the news. By the way, it nearly killed me to have to watch that much of network news.

[TatieBug]

Debates are a must...the fillin was horrible yesterday in his big victory speech.

[T. P. Pole]

Now he has to scrap ads, commission new ones, and change his strategy.

Couldn't he just use the same ads, but every time Torricelli's name was one the screen, they just crossed it out with a black X and have a handwritten Lautenberg above it? I mean, a Rat is a Rat...

[Peach]

Thank you! How do I add the text rather than link? Sorry to keep pestering you with questions but you give good directions.

[Antoninus]

Excellent statement by Forrester. Let's see that rhetoric on a TV/Radio ad blitz, please!

[Torie]

We make the law based on how we feel and we are not bound by elected legislator's or the people that elected them. After all, we are the creme de la creme and you are simply pissants.

I would interlineate it to read as follows:

After all, we are the creme de la creme and you are simply pissants we do it for your own good even if you are too obtuse to fathom the sublimity of our visionary objectives.

UMMV.

[inspector]

This is starting to smell a lot like election year 2000 in Florida. Once again, a state supreme court thwarts the law and forces the issue up the ladder to the federal court system. I hope Forrester keeps at it but the odds are stacked against him in NJ.

[Torie]

By the way, is "creme de la creme" a phrase you commonly hear on your shop floor?

[tomkat]

good job !

try this next time:

<a href=http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/761779/posts target=blank>N.J. Supreme Court Order Violates Reasoning of Bush v. Gore (MUST READ)</a>

the 'target=blank' modifier makes a new window open for the site/thread you're referring to,
which is helpful for old folks like me who lose our place easily     

the thread title between the <a> tags will show up as a hightlighted link ...

[TatieBug]

According to Newt on Hannity tonight, it's a FEDERAL LAW that the absentee ballots overseas to the our sevice people must be mailed on or before 35 days in advance of an election. I count 34 days from today ~ October 2 to November 5. Hopefully the US Supreme Court will take it on this issue. Hang on gang...here we go again hopefully to victory again. They just can't continue making our laws to suit their failures.

[Torie]

Neither Newt nor Hannity is the best place to learn what will happen and why. Just my opinion.

[rstevens]

The problem with not going to the SCOTUS is that it will set precedence for other states and or continueing flagrant unlawfullness by the NJSC. OTH, if SCOTUS hears the case and rules in favor of NJ, then it really will set a precedent.

Either way its a risk. However, Forrester needs to keep pounding the fact he is concerned about our military as being the main reason he goes to the SC.

He need to continue pounding on the disenfrancising of our military. He needs to confront L'berg to see what he is doing about guaranteeing our military and absentee voters will not be strung out to dry.

[Alissa]

I hope and pray that the American people will see the Democratic party's basis is their control of the Judiciary! It is crystal clear now why they are so paranoid of Bush's Judicial nominations! They must be desparate to SHOW their hand so blatantly.

[Peach]

Oh, Tomkat - thank you (I think?!) I'll try it next time and think I get it. Will definitely preview before I post one of those!

[RightWingMama]

Don't get mad -- Get the Senate!!! Let's all send $25 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee via www.nrsc.org.

done

[tomkat]

you're quite welcome ...

one thing i like about html is that it allows me to delude myself into thinking i know some programming,
while still being no competitive threat whatsoever to those who actually do !

[TomT in NJ]

As much as most of us know that we are right, Forrester should drop the appeal to the USSC. Even if SCOTUS rules in our favor, the RATs can revert to the Carnahan option and just tell voters to pull the Toricelli lever with the promise that Lautenberg will replace him in January 2003.

Instead Forrester should ask Pres. Bush to travel to NJ this week and nationalize this disgraceful action by the Dems and the NJSC. I doubt that very many people outside this region even know what has transpired. Bush can use this sham bait-and-switch to shame the Dems and point out how liberal judges are destroying our freedom and the rule of law.

[jwalsh07]

After all, we are the creme de la creme and you are simply pissants we do it for your own good even if you are too obtuse to fathom the sublimity of our visionary objectives.

That's why you write briefs and I wear'em.

[GraniteStateConservative]

We'll see, I guess.

Interfering in a state race where people will be able to vote (even if by write-in) for Torch will be tough for them.

[OldFriend]

Pray for our country, we are under assault from within.