[Question_Assumptions]

If the NJ Supreme Court can make things up because the public has an interest in something, the US Supreme Court should smack them down on the basis that the public has an interest in the rule of law.

[madison46]

Like the FL SC did the first time, they ruled without ruling on the law and the legislatures role in perscribing election rules (aka laws). Personally I think the USSC should send it back like they did FL and MAKE the NJSC address the LAW as passed by the CONSTITUTIONALLY authorized body.

[OldFriend]

Savage just made the great comment.......the stench from the bench.

[jackbill]

The NJ Supreme Court had two issues before them today:

1. Torricelli wanted off the ballot.

2. The DemocRATs wanted someone else on.

The Supremes decided the case on the basis that the "voters" should have a choice.

If they had ruled against 1. and 2., the voters would have had a choice.

The DemocRAT party and the NJ Supreme Court are criminal enterprises.

If the people can't get redress from SCOTUS, it's over for the people of New Jersey.