Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Question_Assumptions
Like the FL SC did the first time, they ruled without ruling on the law and the legislatures role in perscribing election rules (aka laws). Personally I think the USSC should send it back like they did FL and MAKE the NJSC address the LAW as passed by the CONSTITUTIONALLY authorized body.
11 posted on 10/02/2002 5:02:54 PM PDT by madison46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: madison46
Personally I think the USSC should send it back like they did FL and MAKE the NJSC address the LAW as passed by the CONSTITUTIONALLY authorized body.

The major difference is 3 USC 5 clearly spells out that the state laws for election of a President can not be changed after the electioon. 2 USC that covers the election of Senators and Representatives has no equivalent claus.

27 posted on 10/02/2002 5:16:16 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson