Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Old Switcheroo
WeeklyStandard.com ^ | 10/1/02 | Fred Barnes

Posted on 10/01/2002 10:30:35 AM PDT by GeneD

THE POSSIBILITIES are endless. In California, it's said any Republican could defeat Democratic governor Gray Davis--except the guy who won the GOP primary, Bill Simon. So if Simon drops out, Republicans could install The Terminator, a popular GOP figure better known as Arnold Schwarzenegger, as their gubernatorial candidate. In Arkansas, where Tim Hutchinson is in deep reelection peril, Republicans could name his brother, Asa, now head of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, as his replacement. His election prospects would be brighter, thus improving GOP chances of taking the Senate on November 5. Or in Illinois, where Republican Jim Ryan is running far behind in the governor's race, why not get the state's most acclaimed elected official, House Speaker Denny Hastert, to step in?

If all of these possible candidate switches seem bizarre and more than faintly unethical, it's because they are. But they're no more absurd than the attempt by Democrats to replace Sen. Bob Torricelli as their candidate in New Jersey. Torricelli, a one-term senator, is running far behind his Republican challenger, Doug Forrester, and for good reason. Torricelli was reprimanded by the Senate for accepting gifts improperly. And last week federal prosecutors said they believed the testimony of David Chang, the New Jersey resident who said he'd plied the senator with gifts and money. Chang is currently in jail for having done so.

Now there's only one motive behind Torricelli's decision to drop out of the race. He's not dying. He's not even sick. He hasn't been convicted or indicted. Prosecutors feared a jury wouldn't find Chang credible. Torricelli doesn't have to leave the campaign trail to take care of a sick spouse or parent. And it's not certain he'd lose the election if he stayed around. There are five weeks left in the campaign and candidates have come from farther back to win. But the odds are against him. So to give Democrats a better chance of saving the seat and keeping control of the Senate, he stepped down. The only reason was partisan politics. In fact, Torricelli proudly declared this his lone motive.

The whole thing is a ploy. Democrats are trying to pull a fast one. To replace Torricelli with a more saleable candidate, they'll have to violate New Jersey law and the rules of democratic governance. The law says a candidate can be replaced--but only 51 days or more before the election. This election is 35 days away. If a candidate on the ballot dies or resigns, that's another story. Then the governor, who happens to be a Democrat in this case, would have the power to appoint a new senator and set a special election. But Torricelli is alive and kicking, and he won't resign his Senate seat because that would be tantamount to conceding the Chang charges. He wants to serve the final 90 days of his term.

There's a broader problem with the Torricelli stunt: it's anti-Democrat. Voters in New Jersey made their choice for the Democratic Senate nomination in a primary. They backed Torricelli. Now, he would be replaced by someone without the legitimacy of a primary victory but chosen instead by a handful of party leaders worried about losing an election. And there's the boring but important matter of the proper process. Candidates announce, stand for election in a primary, and if nominated by voters run in the general election. This is the democratic process, orderly, time-tested, and based on the popular will. It should be upset only in the most unusual of circumstances. There's nothing unusual about the Torricelli case. He's merely a candidate who's badly trailing and might lose.

Democrats have an honorable (and legal) way of dealing with the New Jersey situation. They can seek to hold onto the Senate seat through a write-in candidacy. Torricelli's name would stay on the ballot, as the law requires, but he could campaign vigorously for voters to scribble the name of some other Democrat--say, Rep. Bob Menendez of former Sen. Frank Lautenberg--as a write-in. The prospects of winning would not be great, but write-ins have won before. Instead Democrats, who angrily insisted that a court should not have decided the 2000 presidential election, are going to court, seeking to have Torricelli's name erased from the ballot and another name substituted. In its own way, this is as sleazy as the conduct that got Torricelli in trouble in the first place.

Fred Barnes is executive editor of The Weekly Standard.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: davidchang; roberttorricelli

1 posted on 10/01/2002 10:30:35 AM PDT by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I haven't had so much fun on FreeRepublic since the early days of Monica.
2 posted on 10/01/2002 10:38:40 AM PDT by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Now there's only one motive behind Torricelli's decision to drop out of the race. He's not dying. He's not even sick.

But he is leaving for medical reasons -- the voters are sick of him.

3 posted on 10/01/2002 10:39:51 AM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
Funniest post of the day so far.
4 posted on 10/01/2002 10:43:52 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

VOTE THE RATS OUT!!

DONATE TODAY.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

5 posted on 10/01/2002 10:57:29 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeneD; Registered
Torricelli = PoorLoserelli
6 posted on 10/01/2002 11:12:00 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Democrats have honorable ways of dealing with all sorts of things, but I've yet to see them take one.
7 posted on 10/01/2002 11:44:03 AM PDT by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHFi; GeneD; Registered; billorites
See this:

Day 4, 11:57 AM ET (Results are delayed 15 minutes)
Total Votes: 38,236

percent votes
Yes (8,739) 
 
(23%)
No (29,497) 
 
(77%)
ALL VOTERS

Add your votes here:

Should the Democratic Party Be Able to Replace Robert Torricelli's Name On the Ballot?

Related article here:

NJ: Property of the Democratic Party


8 posted on 10/05/2002 9:05:15 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

BUMP
9 posted on 10/05/2002 4:16:53 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
...the Torricelli stunt: it's anti-Democrat. Voters in New Jersey made their choice for the Democratic Senate nomination in a primary.

Excellent article, thanks

Voters ALSO made their choice in the democratic primary for fallback candidates, when 66,484 of them turned in a democratic ballot with WRITE-INs or no-votes.

The WRITE-INs should have been tabulated and reported by the Department of State, but were not. It seems they are TOP SECRET!

All those democratic voters who picked fallback candidates using their WRITE-IN powers were disenfranchised, and they should sue the party for $1,000,000,000 each.

10 posted on 10/05/2002 10:08:21 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson